CAUSES OF MORTALITY OF THE SHORTZARED OWL IN SPAlN 131 FIG. l.-A: Comunidades Aut6nomas where the study has been carried out. 1: Gaüeia; 2: CastillaLe6n; 3: Pals Vasco; 4: Cataluna; S: Asturias; 6: Madrid; 7: Castilla-La Mancha; 8: Extremadura; 9: Andaluda; 10: Comunidad Valenciana; 11: Murcia. B: Preferential wintering areas accordmg lo the bibliography and the data dislribution recorded lor this study. 1: Northem halfof the Central plateau. Cantabrian eoastal sirip and Galicia; 2: Eastem and southern coast. [A: Comunidades Autdnomas donde el estudio se ha llevado a cabo. 1: Golicia; 2: Castilla-Le&: 3: Pafs Vasco; 4: Catalufla: 5: Asrurias: 6: Madrid; 7: Casrilla-La Mancha; 8: Extremadura: 9: Andalucla; 10: Comunidad Valenciana: 11: Murcia. B: Areas prefirenciales de invernada de acuerdo con la bibliograíla y la disrribircidn de daros aporrados por este estudio. 1: Subniesera Norte,/ronja costera canfdbrica y Galiua; 2: Levante y cosra andaluza.] The detennination of the cause of death has been done based on the circumstances in which the bodies were found and the postmortem examination by the clinical persone1 of the rescue centres, method already used by other authors (Marti, 1984; Kerlinger & Lein, 1988; Fajardo, 1990). areas are signilicant (1:=4.49, P<0.05) being larger in Z1. This cause acquires a similar value in Bubo bubo with 62.6% (Hemández, 1990) bu1 a secondary importance in Tyco alba with 15.5 % (Fajardo, 1990). Other recorded causes in order of importance are: a) birds found exhausted or emaciated, b) road traflíc accidents (RTAs), c) trapped birds, d) unknown causes, and e) collisions with electric lines. The distnbution is not unifonn between A total of 205 death cases of Asioflammeus have been linally considered and can be clas- research areas. There are highly significant silied according to their cause, area and d a - differences between 2, and Z, in cases of tive value as shown in table 1. OI these, RTAs and trapped birds, which are conside72.2% (n=148) of the total cases belong to rably larger in research area 2(~:=10.27, the study area 1, the remaining 27.8% P<0.01 for RTAs and ~:=8.97, Pt0.01 for ( n = 5 7 ) belong to area 2. Figure 2 represents trapped birds). The losses produced by RTAs are a small the monthly distribution of the total mortality and its distribution in both research proportion of the total (8.3 % for the lberian areas. The highest percentage detected co- peninsula, 4.1 % for Zl). However, in 2 2 the rresponds to shooting (70.2 %), an overw- proponion is considerable (18.3%). In the helming value if compared to the rest of the case of other Ibenan Stngifomes (Tyta alba recorded cases. The diNerences between both and Athene noctua). this cause ofmortality is TABLE 1 Short-ea4 Owl mortality in Spain. Absolute and relative valuu of cach mortality faaor are includcd for both studied zones and totals. [Mortalidad de LechuzaCmpestre en EspriAe Se representan los valores absolutos y relatlws de cada emua registroda para ambas r o ~ des estudio y el total.] Total N Shot ................................................ 144 Emaciated or exhausted ....................... 26 Rta ..................................................... 17 Trapped .............................................. 9 Unknown ............................................ 7 2 Electrocutcd ........................................ 205 Zone 2 Zone 1 % N % N % 70.2 12.6 8.29 4.3 3.4 0.97 110 25 34 1 11 58.6 2 5 74.8 16.3 4.08 1.3 3.3 O O 6 148 7 2 2 1.7 18.9 12 3.4 3.4 S7 of primary importance and lar above the rest concentration o1 the facton that propiciate (36.5 % lor T. alba). RTAs for this species (for a description of Emaeiation is an important c a u s in area these factors see Fajardo et al., 1992). The 1, and the difference is highly significant higher toll of trapped birds in area 2 is caubf=7.41, P=O.Ol). sed by a charactenstic and traditionally poThe otber causes are not o1 great impor- pular type of trap called xparanyr, which actance in our sample as their values are always counts for the death of many migratory birds under 5 % for both areas. If we add the va- each year (pers. obs. G.E.R.). lues of the mortalities caused directly or indiThe importance of direct or indirect hurectly by man, we reach a stunning 83.9 % man factors, as causes o1 death, in both zones (n= 172) of the total (80.2 %, n = 118, for area separately and as a whole, is so worrying that 1and 93.1 %, n=54, for area 2). ?he diíferen- it could be considered as a cause o1 populaces between Z, and Z, are significant tion decline, as it occurs with other owls lx: =4.15, P-zO.05). (Colvin, 1985; Hernández, 1988; Fajardo, 1990, Fajardo et al.. 1992). The considerable difference between r e search areas in the relative values of mortality caused by emaciation is diliicult to interThe temporal distribution 01the mortality pret biologically. For other irruptive wintering owls like the o1Asioflammeus in Spain shows great similaSnowy Owl (Nyctea scandioca), the imporrity to its phenology. On the other hand, the spatial &%tribu- tance oi the mortality caused by starvation is tion of data seems to confirm the possible proportionally low (14.1 %). However, this existence o1 two preferential wintering and/or amount tends to grow m perifenc zones of migratory areas for this species in the Iberian their wintering areas (Kerlinger & Lein, 1988). peninsula, as other authors have already Considering the great similitude in the irregular and it-ruptive migratory behaviour of both pointed out (Asensio et al., 1992). As far as the different mortality causes are species (Sparks & Soper, 1991), the wncluconcerned, shooting is by far the most impor- sions reached for the Snowy Owl might be tant cause of death in ihe whole o1 the wun- extrapolated and applied to this study of Asio try and therefore the main threat for the po- flommeus in S p a h In that m e , the importance of emaciation would depend on the year. pulation ol this wintering owl. It can Iinally be concluded that the manaThe increased mortality by collisions with vehicles in area 2 can be due to a higher gement of the species in Spain should first CAUSES OF MORTALITYOF THE SHORT-EAREDOWL M SPAIN 133 FE. 2.-Monthly distribution o1 Short-eared Owl mortality in both zones and the total. [Distribucidn mensual de la mortalidad de la Lechuza Campestre paro las dos zonas y el total a lo largo del arlo.] COLVIN, B.A. 1985. Common Bam-Owl population decline in Ohio and the Relationship to Agricultura1 trends. Journal o/ Field Orniihology, 56: 224-235. CRAMP,S. (E.).1985. The Birds of !he Wesrern Pulemic. Vol. 1V. Oxford Universitv Press. Oxlord, DELieEs, J. 1989. Plagas de Topillos en Espaóa. mntribution oí aditional data by Luis corra, 1.1. Quercus. 35: 17-20. Palomo Ferrer, Gabriel Babiloni, G.ER , EFAV.. -, HIRALDO, F. & HERWIA,B. 1991. Datos DamiA Sinchez, GREFA, BRINZAL, Alfrcdo Orsobre la Dieta lnvernal de la Lechuza Campestega, Raul Martlnez. Pepe Antollh Carlota Viada tre (Asio liammeus) en un wríodo de abundany CONCER. Justo Martln helped us wiih the coms en cia de TO&O ~a&pesinoi ~ i c m t u arrv?lis) puler. We also thank Dr. Fran Hernhndez Carrasla Submeseta Norte (Espaila). Ecologfa. 5: 355quilia as the main responsable ior the birth of this 358. work. An anonymous referee gave helpful com- FAJARDO, 1. 1990. Mortalidad de la Lechuza comenis to improve the final version o1 the paper. men (Tylo alba) en Espaaa Central. Ardeola. 37: 101-106. RIVASES, R., SANCHEL. F. HEBRERO, J.M., RABIBLI~RAPHY MIRO, F. & TENLLADO, M. 1992. Informe de 10s atropelios en las Rapaces Nocturnas. 1 Jornadas F., FERNANDEZ, A. & FASAR- para el Estudio y Prevención de la Mortalidad ASENSIO, B., CANTOS, de Vertebrados en Carreteras. Tomo 111. DO, 1. 1992. La Lechuza Campestre en España. C.O.D.A. pp: 290-305. bear in mind :he need for a reduction in the mottality caused by man. The importante of human factors might cons:itute a cause o[ regression of the breeding population. -. 134 ARDEOLA 41(lA 19% GONZALEZ, L.M., GONZALEZ, J.L, Llandns. C. & PALACIOS, F. 1980. Atimentacidn de la Lechuza Campestre (Asio jlammeus jlammeus Pontoppidan. 1783) ea Espafia. Actas II Reunión Iberoamericana sobre Conservación y Zoologla de Vertebrados. Cgcens: 244-253. HERNANDEZ, M. 1988. Road Monality of the Little Owl (Athene noctua) in Central Spain. Raptor Research, 22: 81-84. 1989. Mortalidad del Búho Real en Espaiia Quercus. 40: 24-25. ICONA. 1992. Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de España. MAPA. Madrid. J.V. & JIMÉNEZ WRPZ J., G ~ D LLA., ~ SESCOBAR, LACOMBA. 1. 1989. Estudio de la Aiimentacidn de la Lechuza Campestre (Asiojlammeus) y la Lechuza Común (Tyto Alba) en L'Albufera de Valencia Medl Natural, 1: 81-88. - KERLINGER, P. & LEIN,M.R. 1988. Causes of Mortality, Fat Conditions and Weights o1Wintering Snowy Owls. Journai of Fiefd Ornirhology, 59: ." " 1-1L. MARTI,C.D. & WAONER. P. 1984. Winter Mortality in Common Barn Ówls and iU effea on Population Density and Rcproduction. nte Condor. 87: 111-115. H.~ 1983. Owls of Europe. Calton. PoyMIKKOL ser. Riv* MAKI~NEZ. S. 1981. Les etages Biociiunatlqus de la Vegetalion de la Peninsule lbenque. Anales del Instituto Bordnico de Madrid, 37: 251-268. SPARKS, J. & SOPER,T. 1991. Owls, their narural and unnatural history. David & Charles. Newton Abbot. [Recibido: 13.12.931 [Aceptado: 14.6.941