here

Anuncio
ESPAÑOL 4
DEBATE EN CLASE
Nombre: __________________________
Fecha: __________________________
Formato
Cada debate tomará 22 minutos.
Equipo A- 2 minutos para construir su argumento
Equipo B- 2 minutos para construir su argumento
Descanso- 3 minutos para planear el contraataque
Equipo B- 2 minutos para contraatacar al argumento del otro equipo
Equipo A- 2 minutos para contraatacar al argumento del otro equipo
Descanso- 3 minutos para planear la reconstrucción de su argumento
Equipo A- 2 minutos para reconstruir el argumento
Equipo B- 2 minutos para reconstruir su argumento
Descanso- 2 minutos para planear la conclusión de su argumento
Equipo A- Conclusión 1 minuto
Equipo B- Conclusión 1 minuto
ESPAÑOL 4
DEBATE EN CLASE
Nombre: __________________________
Fecha: __________________________
Rúbrica para el Equipo Afirmativo
Criteria
1. Organization
& Clarity:
1
2
3
4
Unclear and
disorganized
throughout
Clear in some
parts but not
overall
Mostly clear and
orderly in all parts
Completely clear
and orderly
presentation
Few or no real
arguments
given, or all
arguments
given had
significant
problems
Poor crossexam of
rebuttals,
failure to point
out problems in
Negative
team’s position
or failure to
defend itself
against attack.
Some decent
arguments, but
some significant
problems
Many good
arguments given,
with only minor
problems
Very strong and
persuasive
arguments given
throughout
Decent crossexam and/or
rebuttals, but
with some
significant
problems
Good cross-exam
and rebuttals, with
only minor slip-ups
Excellent crossexam and defense
against Negative
team’s objections
Very few style
features were
used none of
them
convincingly
Few style
features were
used
convincingly
Most style
features were
used convincingly
All style features
were used
convincingly
Grade:
Main arguments
and responses
are outlined in a
clear and orderly
way.
2. Use of
Argument:
Reasons are
given to support
the resolution.
3. Use of crossexamination
and rebuttal:
Identification of
weakness in
Affirmative team’s
arguments and
ability to defend
itself against
attack.
4. Presentation
Style:
Tone of voice,
clarity of
expression,
precision of
arguments all
contribute to
keeping
audience’s
attention and
persuading them
of the team’s
case.
Total:
ESPAÑOL 4
DEBATE EN CLASE
Nombre: __________________________
Fecha: __________________________
Rúbrica para el Equipo Negativo
Criteria
1. Organization
& Clarity:
1
2
3
4
Unclear and
disorganized
throughout
Clear in some
parts but not
overall
Mostly clear and
orderly in all parts
Completely clear
and orderly
presentation
Few or no real
arguments
given, or all
arguments
given had
significant
problems
Poor crossexam of
rebuttals,
failure to point
out problems in
Affirmative
team’s position
or failure to
defend itself
against attack.
Some decent
arguments, but
some significant
problems
Many good
arguments given,
with only minor
problems
Very strong and
persuasive
arguments given
throughout
Decent crossexam and/or
rebuttals, but
with some
significant
problems
Good cross-exam
and rebuttals, with
only minor slip-ups
Excellent crossexam and defense
against Affirmative
team’s objections
Very few style
features were
used none of
them
convincingly
Few style
features were
used
convincingly
Most style
features were
used convincingly
All style features
were used
convincingly
Grade:
Main arguments
and responses
are outlined in a
clear and orderly
way.
2. Use of
Argument:
Reasons are
given to support
the resolution.
3. Use of crossexamination
and rebuttal:
Identification of
weakness in
Affirmative team’s
arguments and
ability to defend
itself against
attack.
4. Presentation
Style:
Tone of voice,
clarity of
expression,
precision of
arguments all
contribute to
keeping
audience’s
attention and
persuading them
of the team’s
case.
Total:
Descargar