Evaluación de las condiciones ergonómicas en el sector

!
"
!
!
$
#$ #
#
"
%
%
#
#
&
#
& #! '
#"
'
(! ) #
(
*
!
$
)"
+
$
)
%
&
"
$
+
,
)
%
(
-
&
$
.
"
#
$
&
"
)
*#
" (
( #
0
+
/
$
+
1
2
/
0
3
0
+
4
&
#
4
#
"
)
"
/
(
(+
"
"
"
&
1
( +
!
"
" &
(
" %
&
"
+"
2
/
"
#$ #
$
#
( +
*" +
'
)
)
"
"
& +
"
"
$
"
0
"
"
"
"
"
#"
#"
'
+"
"
*
$
(#
)
"
$
+
"
#
&
2
$
$
(
#
+"
" -5 "
1 '
/
•
%
)
+
•
&
+
#
&
6
"
(# "
"
.
"
(#
)
$
%
(
&
"
"
•
3
•
4
•
-
•
7 (
•
-
(
+
/
#
+
"
+
&
+
+
/
+"
"
)
"
"
•
7
(
.
+
( +
+
(
•
)
:
," 8
;
)
+
/
)
9
1
9
:;2 &
( #
+
&
( "
+
(
(<
9
:;
(
1
3(
2
Figura 1 – Método Ergo/IBV de evaluación de riesgos asociados a la carga física.
•
! %
% #
#
>(
8(
+
+"
'
/0
! #- . %
"
?
1
3(
#9
:;
9
2
!
"
"
( "
+
+
=
#
.
)
<
"
Figura 2 – Manual desarrollado por el IBV y el INSHT para las PYME.
•
)
" 1
8(
(
@A *
#
"
+
2
'
(
&
.
"
"
"
"
*
"
9
:;
+
+
( +
(
)
(
&
+
"
'
(
$
'
+
+
+
.
/
•
?'
•
4
"
'
( +
(
+
"
#
•
(
$ (
+
'
. (
(
)
( +
( +
"
"
&
(
(
"
+"
&
1
3(
2
"
2
2
2
Figura 3 – Programa de diseño ergonómico de puestos de trabajo: simulación de una de las posturas de
la enfermera instrumentista en quirófano (a) y dos alternativas propuestas para reducir la carga física en
esta postura (b, c).
•
B*C4D
*0A7 9
=* 4 "489
C9
; * 4 ".*B * "A7C*B* C "E
7CF5 C*"E
1 GGH2 CB709
:;
+
(
(
#
9
:
)
;
1
9
:;2
".
";
•
B7=I* I 7 9
;*"4 1 GG 2 (
8
K L
.*B9
=*>/ 0
•
89
B= ??" >! A4*?*A= M" ! 1
1
C :*2
K *
(
L
•
#
$
J
?
2J
C
0
7="4 - 1 G 24
(
$
/( #
•
A*4*?*A= M" !47C ??" = 1 GG 2 (
N ,
$ $
%
(
";7 5A =/ "=L G".*B9
=*>/
GO 0GH
•
= P I * *=- - .*C?A =? 73 *:75C" 7445.*?9
7=* >*3 ?M *=8 * ?8 > C;9
4
: ,
4 /.
(A
,
9
>
8
C
4
3
?$ "
P
( "= N I
•
=7B*C -*" > ! *C*5E
7" 4 ! *C*=-*" E! E
7>*" C ! C9
:*" * 1 GG 2
$
/
>
?
;7 5A =/
.*B9
=*>/ 0 O
•
.8 *>*=?"> !87 A >"- !>?5::>"- 1 GG 2J
: ,
(
K
4
(
GG /
.
(
>
Q *
4
"> $
"
*
GG 17; > M" E 1 2
2
•
?7C?7>* " B*C4D
*0A7 9
=* 4 " .*B
1 GGH2
(
#
9
>
1
9
A> C>72
"A
•
; C>485C ="C !BC77?": - !=7>> =?"> 1 GG 2P
$
$
5
3
(
P , (4
(
/
(
$
" O0 G
* " 3 CC C*> * " ? C5
A(
>
, (
$ 9
*