TrailMakingTest

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305442629
Trail Making Test: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking
adult population
Article in Neurorehabilitation · January 2015
CITATIONS
READS
24
906
19 authors, including:
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
Daniel AGUILAR Rivera
Biocruces Health Research Institute
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas
362 PUBLICATIONS 3,728 CITATIONS
91 PUBLICATIONS 801 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Adriana Aguayo
Widaliz Rodriguez
Instituto Vocacional Enrique Diaz de Leon
University of Puerto Rico at Bayamón
32 PUBLICATIONS 226 CITATIONS
15 PUBLICATIONS 156 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Estudio de datos normativos para pruebas neuropsicológicas en población de 6 a 17 años de edad en Iberoamérica View project
Neuropsicología y Educación View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Javier Galarza-del-Angel on 21 July 2016.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
639
NeuroRehabilitation 37 (2015) 639–661
DOI:10.3233/NRE-151284
IOS Press
Trail Making Test: Normative data
for the Latin American Spanish speaking
adult population
J.C. Arango-Lasprillaa,b,∗ , D. Riverab , A. Aguayoc , W. Rodrı́guezd , M.T. Garzae , C.P. Sarachof ,
Y. Rodrı́guez-Agudelog , A. Aliagah , G. Weileri , M. Lunaj , M. Longonik , N. Ocampo-Barbal ,
J. Galarza-del-Angelm , I. Panyavinb , A. Guerran , L. Esenarroo , P. Garcı́a de la Cadenap ,
C. Martı́nezq and P.B. Perrinr
a IKERBASQUE,
Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
c Instituto Vocacional Enrique Dı́az de León, Guadalajara, Mexico
d Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, Puerto Rico
e Facultad de Psicologı́a, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico
f CETYS University, Mexicali, Mexico
g Instituto Nacional de Neurologı́a y Neurocirugı́a MVS, Mexico City, Mexico
h Servicio Médico Legal, Ministerio de Justicia, Santiago, Chile
i Instituto de Prevención Social, Asunción, Paraguay
j Universidad Dr, José Matı́as Delgado, San Salvador, El Salvador
k Clı́nica de rehabilitación Las Araucarias, Buenos Aires, Argentina
l Fundación Horizontes, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia
m Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
n Departamento de Psicologı́a, Universidad de Camagüey Ignacio Agramonte Loynaz, Camaguey, Cuba
o Departamento de Psicologı́a, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala
p Instituto de Neuropsicologı́a y Demencias, Lima, Peru
q Departamento de Medicina de Rehabilitación, Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
r Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
b Faculty
Abstract.
OBJECTIVE: To generate normative data on the Trail Making Test (TMT) across 11 countries in Latin America, with countryspecific adjustments for gender, age, and education, where appropriate.
METHOD: The sample consisted of 3,977 healthy adults who were recruited from Mexico, Argentina, Peru, Paraguay, Honduras,
Chile, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Bolivia. Each subject was administered the TMT as part of a larger
neuropsychological battery. A standardized five-step statistical procedure was used to generate the norms.
RESULTS: The final multiple linear regression models for the TMT-A explained 23–50% of the variance, and the final multiple
linear models for the TMT-B explained 22–49% of the variance. Although there were gender differences on the TMT in Mexico,
Peru, Paraguay, and Honduras, only Honduras had an effect size greater than 0.3. As a result, gender-adjusted norms were generated
for the Trail Making Test-A, but not B, in this country.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to create norms for the TMT in Latin America. As a result, this study will have
important implications for the practice of neuropsychology in the future.
Keywords: Normative data, Trail Making Test, reference values, Latin America, executive function
∗ Address
for correspondence: Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla,
Ph.D., IKERBASQUE Research Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Deusto, IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation
for Science, Bilbao, Spain. Tel.: +34 804 859 4329;
jcarango@deusto.es.
1053-8135/15/$35.00 © 2015 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved
E-mail:
640
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
1. Introduction
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is one of the most
widely used neuropsychological assessment instruments and is the most common instrument for the
assessment of attention (Rabin, Barr, & Burton, 2005).
This paper-and-pencil test is easily administered, is
in the public domain, and can be reproduced without
permission (Lezak, Howieson, & Loring, 2004). Originally developed to assess general intelligence as part
of the Army Individual Test Battery (1944), it was
later included in the Halstead-Reitan Battery (Reitan &
Wolfson, 1985), with detailed administration instructions updated by Spreen and Strauss (1998).
The TMT is considered a measure of psychomotor speed, visual scanning, attention, sequencing, and
mental flexibility (Spreen & Strauss, 1998; Mitrushina,
Boone, & D’Ella, 1999), and consists of two parts: Part
A and Part B (TMT-A and TMT-B). In Part A, the goal
is to connect consecutively numbered semi-randomly
distributed circles on a sheet of paper as quickly as possible by drawing lines between them, without lifting
the pencil from the paper (Lezak, Howieson, & Loring, 2004). Part B requires the subject to connect on a
separate worksheet in ascending and alternating order
the same number of circles which contain numbers and
letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3, etc.). TMT-A is considered to
be a measure of visual search/attention skills and psychomotor speed, as its performance has been shown
to correlate with scores on other timed tasks which
require visual search (e.g., WAIS-III Digit Symbol Coding; Sanchez-Cubillo et al., 2009). TMT-B, on the other
hand, is thought of as a measure of executive control,
cognitive flexibility, and set shifting, as it is correlated
with performance on cognitive alternation and taskswitching tests, as well as increased activation of frontal
cortices on fMRI studies and results of prefrontal cortex lesion studies (Crowe, 1998; Arbuthnott & Frank,
2000; Yochim, Baldo, Nelson, & Delis, 2007; Jacobson,
Blanchard, Connolly, Cannon, & Garavan, 2011). Both
parts of the test have exhibited high test-retest reliability
(at least 0.76 for Part A, and 0.82 for Part B in recently
reported studies), with the coefficient values generally
higher for TMT-B compared to A (Lezak et al., 2004;
Seo et al., 2006; Wagner, Helmreich, Dahmen, Lieb, &
Tadić, 2011).
The subject’s performance on the Trail Making Test
yields two scores: times to completion (in seconds) for
Parts A and B. Additionally, derived scores (i.e., difference B–A, and ratio B:A) are oftentimes used in
clinical practice to remove the speed component from
the test performance, provide a more pure measure of
executive control, and serve as a possible symptom
validity indicator (Arbuthnott & Frank, 2000; Drane,
Yuspeh, Huthwaite, & Klingler, 2002; Lezak et al.,
2004; Egeland, & Langfjaeran, 2007; Ashendorf, Jefferson, O’Connor, Chaisson, Green, & Stern, 2008;
Sanchez-Cubillo et al., 2009).
The TMT is considered to be one of the best measures
of general brain function (Armitage, 1946; Spreen &
Benton, 1965; Reitan & Wolfson, 1985) and is sensitive
to many dysfunctions in both adult and pediatric patient
populations (Reitan & Wolfson, 1985). Due to its wide
applicability, the TMT has been utilized to measure
the cognitive effects of hepatic encephalopathy (Conn,
1977; Riggio et al., 2011), cognitive deterioration in
HIV positive patients (Chalermchai et al., 2013; Selnes
et al., 1991) and polydrug users (McCaffrey, Krahula, &
Heimberg, 1989), patients with head trauma (Leininger,
Gramling, Farrell, Kreutzer, & Peck, 1990; Thaler et al.,
2012), Alzheimer’s disease (Amieva et al., 1998; Terada
et al., 2013), Parkinson’s disease, supranuclear palsy
(Pellecchia et al., 2015; Pillon et al., 1995), mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging (Ashendorf et al.,
2008), among other disorders.
Despite its extensive use in neuropsychological and
neuropsychiatric populations, the performance on the
TMT has been associated with cultural and demographic factors (Agranovich & Puente, 2007; Horton
& Roberts, 2003). While gender showed little relation with performance in adults (Tombaugh, 2004),
increased age and lower education are related to lower
test scores (Bornstein & Suga, 1988; Periañez et al.,
2007; Wecker, Kramer, Wisniewski, Delis, & Kaplan,
2000; Woods, Wyma, Herron, & Yund, 2015). Ethnicity,
cultural background, and degree of acculturation have
also been linked to performance on the TMT (Ardila,
2001; Fernández & Marcopulos, 2008).
It has been recommended in the past to take cultural variables into consideration at each stage of
neuropsychological evaluation, including administration and interpretation of results (Ardila, 1995; Golden
& Thomas, 2000; Ardila & Moreno, 2001). However, until relatively recently the preponderance of
normative TMT data has been obtained mainly from
Western, well-educated, and English-speaking countries (e.g., U.S., Canada; Tombaugh, 2004; Spreen &
Strauss, 1998; Selnes et al., 1991; Goul & Brown,
1970). To ameliorate this problem, normative studies
of the TMT have recently been carried out in other
regions of the world, namely, in Japan (Abe et al.,
2004; Hashimoto et al., 2006), Korea (Seo et al., 2006),
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Spain (Peña-Casanova et al., 2009), Turkey (Cangoz,
Karakoc, & Selekler, 2009), China (Wang et al., 2011),
and the Czech Republic (Bezdicek, 2012), and Portugal
(Cavaco et al., 2013).
There is lack of normative neuropsychological data
in Latin America, where to the best of our knowledge
only two normative studies about the TMT have taken
place. Campanholo and colleagues (2014) administered
a battery of neuropsychological tests which included
the TMT to 1025 healthy native Portuguese speakers
from five regions of Brazil, obtaining normative data
stratified by age (into six groups, ranging from 18 to
over 70 years old) and years of education (four groups,
0–13 years). Fernández and colleagues (2002) obtained
the TMT normative data from a sample of 251 healthy
adults (ages 15–70 y.o.) from all educational levels
(0–24 years) in Argentina, and observed differential
performance as a function of age and education. As
relatively few individuals were included in certain cells
of this normative study (e.g., only 9 participants over 60
years old with high level of education) generalizability
of the findings may be somewhat limited. Even in the
normative data obtained in Western countries, there is
a great deal of variability, such that depending upon the
norms used, an otherwise normal performance could be
classified as pathological, and vice versa (Fernández &
Marcopulos, 2008). The present study aims to establish
normative data, stratified by age and educational level,
for 11 countries in Latin America.
2. Method
2.1. Participants
The sample consisted of 3,977 healthy individuals
who were recruited from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile,
Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico,
Paraguay, Peru, and, Puerto Rico. The participants were
selected according to the following criteria: a) were
between 18 to 95 years of age, b) were born and currently lived in the country where the protocol was
conducted, c) spoke Spanish as their native language,
d) had completed at least one year of formal education,
e) were able to read and write at the time of evaluation,
f) scored ≥23 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975),
g) scored ≤4 on the Patient Health Questionnaire–9
(PHQ-9, Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001), and h)
scored ≥90 on the Barthel Index (Mahoney, & Barthel,
1965).
641
Participants with self-reported neurologic or psychiatric disorders were excluded due to a potential
effect on cognitive performance. Participants were volunteers from the community and signed an informed
consent. Twelve participants were excluded from the
analyses, with a final sample of 3965 participants.
Socio-demographic and participant characteristics for
each of the countries’ samples have been reported
elsewhere (Guàrdia-Olmos, Peró-Cebollero, Rivera, &
Arango-Lasprilla, 2015). The multi-center study was
approved by the Ethics Committee of the coordinating
site, the University of Deusto, Spain.
2.2. Instrument administration
The TMT consists of two parts: TMT-A and B. In
the TMT-A the individual must draw a line to connect
25 numbers in ascending order, which are circled and
randomly distributed on a sheet of paper. The task
requirements are similar for the TMT-B, except that
the person alternates between numbers and letters
(1-A, 2-B, 3-C, etc.), the latter being significantly
more difficult (Drane, Yuspeh, Huthwaite, & Klingler,
2002). The score is the time that an individual takes to
finish the task in each test. The time limit for TMT-A
is 100 seconds (maximum score) and 300 seconds
for TMT-B.
2.3. Statistical analyses
The detailed statistical analyses used to generate the normative data for this test are described in
Guàrdia-Olmos et al. (2015). In summary, the data
manipulation process for each country-specific dataset
involved five-steps: a) t – tests for independent samples and effect sizes (r) were conducted to determine
gender effects. If the effect size was larger than 0.3,
gender was included in the model with gender dummy
coded and female as the reference group (male = 1 and
female = 0). b) A multivariable regression model was
used to specify the predictive model including gender
(if effect size was larger than 0.3), age as a continuous variable, and education as a dummy coded variable
with 1 if the participant had >12 years of education
and 0 if participants had 1–12 years of education.
If gender, age and/or education was not statistically
significant in this multivariate model with an alpha
of 0.05, the non-significant variables were removed
and the model was re-run. Then a final regression
model was conducted that included age (if statistically
significant in the multivariate model), dichotomized
642
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table 1
Effect of gender in the TMT-A
Country
Gender
Mean (SD)
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
r
Argentina
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
32.1 (10.4)
34.1 (12.3)
75.1 (23.1)
75.5 (24.4)
53.8 (24.1)
53.9 (22.7)
62.3 (22.3)
64.3 (22.5)
53.1 (25.5)
42.7 (24.2)
62.9 (28.2)
68.7 (23.3)
67.9 (24.2)
81.8 (20.9)
54.9 (23.2)
58.3 (23.6)
61.7 (21.5)
69.4 (20.6)
44.2 (18.7)
51.4 (23.4)
46.4 (23.8)
48.1 (24.1)
–1.40
318
0.161
0.079
–0.13
272
0.897
0.008
–0.03
318
0.975
0.002
–0.79
304
0.427
0.046
0.12
212
0.904
0.008
–1.74
181.8
0.083
0.128
–3.93
121.8
<0.001∗∗∗
0.335 b
–2.45
1,291
0.015∗
0.068
–2.92
261
0.004∗∗
0.178
–2.66
211.6
0.009∗∗
0.180
–0.59
288
0.557
0.035
Bolivia
Chile
Cuba
Guatemala
El Salvadora
Hondurasa
Mexico
Paraguay
Perua
Puerto Rico
a Value
of the t-test for independent groups from the different variances with the corresponding correction of Yuen-Welch of degrees of freedom.
b r > 0.3, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
education (if statistically significant in the multivariate model), and/or gender (if effect size was
greater than 0.3) [ŷi = β0 + (βAge · Agei ) + (βEduc ·
Educi ) + (βGender · Genderi )]; c) residual scores were
calculated based on this final model (ei = yi − ŷi ); d)
using the SDe (residual) value provided by the regression model, residuals were standardized: z = ei /SDe ,
with SDe (residual) = the standard deviation of the
residuals in the normative sample; and e) standardized
residuals were converted to percentile values (Strauss
et al., 2006). Using each country’s dataset, these steps
were applied to TMT A & B errors.
3. Results
3.1. Trail Making Test – A
Regarding the effect of gender on TMT-A, the ttests showed significant differences between men and
women in the countries of Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay,
and Peru. Table 1 shows the results of the gender analysis by country on TMT-A scores. As shown in Table 1,
the effect sizes for all countries except Honduras were
less than 0.3, and therefore gender was only taken into
account to generate TMT-A normative data for the Honduras sample.
The final eleven TMT-A scores multivariate linear regression models for each country are shown in
Table 2. In all countries, except Puerto Rico, the TMTA scores decreased for those with more than 12 years
of education (see Table 2), and, in all countries, TMT-A
scores increased in a linear fashion as a function of age.
The amount of variance explained in TMT-A scores
ranged from 23% (in Argentina) to 50% (in Paraguay).
3.2. Trail Making Test – B
Regarding the effect of gender on TMT-B scores,
the t-test showed significant differences between men
and women in the countries of Honduras, Mexico, and
Paraguay. Table 3 shows the results of the gender analysis by country on TMT-B. As shown in Table 3, the
effect sizes for all countries were less than 0.3, and
therefore gender was not taken into account to generate
TMT-B normative data.
The final eleven TMT-B multivariate linear regression models for each country are shown in Table 4. In all
countries, TMT-B scores decreased for those with more
than 12 years of education (see Table 4) and, TMT-B
scores increased in a linear fashion as a function of age.
The amount of variance explained in TMT-B scores
ranged from 22% (in Cuba) to 49% (in Honduras).
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
643
Table 2
Final multiple linear regression models for TMT-A
Country
Argentina
Bolivia
Chile
Cuba
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Mexico
Paraguay
Peru
Puerto Rico
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
Gender (Female)
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
B
Std. Error
t
Sig.
R2
SDe (residual)
26.410
0.228
–6.146
44.467
0.588
–11.016
22.338
0.639
–15.091
34.560
0.590
–10.474
43.226
0.521
–28.461
37.370
0.445
–21.622
68.124
0.369
–22.922
–10.314
25.357
0.644
–8.327
41.778
0.551
–25.425
29.402
0.600
–10.215
15.192
0.634
1.674
0.030
1.165
3.328
0.054
3.101
3.197
0.051
2.333
3.129
0.054
2.496
3.621
0.059
2.997
4.713
0.081
2.919
4.226
0.073
3.183
2.791
1.519
0.026
1.261
3.950
0.068
2.641
3.197
0.054
2.316
3.586
0.066
15.776
7.650
–5.276
13.363
10.957
–3.552
6.988
12.442
–6.469
11.045
10.985
–4.196
11.939
8.830
–9.496
7.929
5.464
–7.406
16.120
5.056
–7.201
–3.696
16.697
24.969
–6.604
10.576
8.049
–9.627
9.198
11.113
–4.411
4.237
9.555
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.238
10.264
0.350
19.255
0.456
17.159
0.324
18.422
0.415
19.451
0.292
20.609
0.403
17.836
0.365
18.732
0.502
14.970
0.409
16.972
0.241
20.880
4. Normative procedure
Norms (e.g., a percentile score) for the TMT A &
B scores were established using the five-step procedure described above. To facilitate the understanding
of the procedure to obtain the percentile associated
with a score on this test, an example will be given.
Suppose you need to find the percentile score for an
Argentine man, who is 50 years old and has 17 years of
education. He has a score of 40 (seconds) on TMT-A.
The steps to obtain the percentile for this score are:
a) Check Table 1 to determine if the effect size of
gender in the country of interest (Argentina) on this
test and time point (TMT-A) is greater than 0.3 by
country. The column labelled r in Table 1 indicates
the effect size and the superscript notation b next to
the number indicates that the number is larger than
0.3. In this example, the effect size is 0.079, which is
not greater than 0.3. For Argentines on this test, gender does not influence scores to a sufficient degree to
take it into account gender when determining the percentile. b) Find Argentina in Table 2, which provides
the final regression models by country for TMT-B. Use
the B weights to create an equation that will allow
you to obtain the predicted TMT-B score. The corresponding B weights are multiplied by the actual age
and dichotomized education scores and added to a
constant in order to calculate the predicted value. In
this case, the predicted TMT-A would be calculated
using the equation [ŷi = 26.410 + (0.228 · Agei ) +
(−6.146 · Dichotomized Educational Level i )] (the values have been rounded for presentation in the formula).
The subscript notation i indicate the person of interest.
The person’s age is 50, but the education variable is not
continuous in the model. Years of education is split into
either 1 to 12 years (and assigned a 0) or more than 12
years (and assigned a 1) in the model. Since our hypothetical person in the example has 17 years of education,
his educational level value is 1. Thus the predicted
value is ŷi = 26.410 + (0.228 · 50) + (−6.146 · 1) =
644
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table 3
Effect of gender in the TMT-B
Country
Gender
Mean (SD)
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
r
Argentina
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
68.0 (36.9)
74.5 (49.5)
181.0 (95.0)
186.7 (90.8)
138.4 (73.0)
141.7 (79.6)
146.0 (74.6)
150.2 (78.9)
168.8 (101.5)
183.4 (92.2)
144.7 (92.5)
127.9 (87.0)
168.5 (83.3)
212.6 (87.8)
114.8 (72.9)
127.2 (75.6)
124.0 (57.1)
138.6 (57.8)
103.0 (65.6)
114.3 (76.5)
113.4 (70.6)
118.6 (76.1)
–1.15
317
0.249
0.065
–0.49
272
0.621
0.030
–0.38
318
0.702
0.021
–0.47
304
0.638
0.027
–1.19
255
0.233
0.075
1.36
212
0.174
0.093
–3.24
168
0.001∗∗
0.243
–2.83
1.288
0.005∗∗
0.079
–2.00
261
0.047∗
0.123
–1.15
243
0.249
0.074
–0.59
286
0.557
0.035
Bolivia
Chile
Cuba
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Mexico
Paraguay
Peru
Puerto Rico
∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01.
26.410 + 11.397 − 6.146 = 31.662). c) In order to calculate the residual value (indicated with an e in the
equation), we subtract the actual value from the predicted value we just calculated (ei = yi − ŷi ). In this
case, it would be ei = 40 − 31.662 = 8.338. d) Next,
consult the SDe column in Table 2 to obtain the countryspecific SDe (residual) value. For Argentina it is 10.264.
Using this value, we can transform the residual value to
a standardized z score using the equation (ei /SDe ). In
this case, we have 8.338/10.264 = 0.812. In the case
of TMT A & B, the order of the scores were reversed
(e.g., the z score sign changed from negative to positive
or positive to negative) in order to maintain an interpretation of improved performance, higher percentile.
Thus –0.812 is the standardized z score for an Argentine man aged 50 and 17 years of education and a score
of 40 on TMT-A. e) The last step is to use look-up the
tables in the statistical reference books (e.g. Strauss et
al., 2006) or use a trusted online calculator like the one
available at http://www.measuringu.com/pcalcz.php. In
the online calculator, you would enter the z score and
choose a one-sided test and note the percent of area after
hitting the submit button. In this case, the probability
of −0.812 corresponds to the 21st percentile. Please
remember to use the appropriate tables that correspond
to each test when performing these calculations. If the
percentile for the TMT-B scores is desired, Tables 3-4
must be used.
4.1. User-friendly normative data
The five-step normative procedures explained above
can provide more individualized norms. However, this
method can be prone to human error due to the number
of required computations. To enhance user-friendliness,
the authors have completed these steps for a range of
raw scores based on small age range groupings (see
Guàrdia-Olmos et al., 2015) and created tables so that
clinicians can more easily use to obtain a percentile
range associated with a given raw score on this test.
These tables are available by country and type of test
in the Appendix. In order to obtain an approximate percentile for the above example (converting a raw score
of 40 for an Argentine man who is 50 years old and has
17 years of education) using the simplified normative
tables provided, the following steps are recommended.
(1) First, identify the appropriate table ensuring the specific country and test. In this case, the table for TMT-A
for Argentina can be found in Table A1. (2) Note if the
title of the table indicates that it is only to be used for
one specific gender. In this case, gender is not specified.
Thus Table A1 is used for both males and females. (3)
Next, the table is divided based on educational level (1
to 12 vs. more than 12 years of education). Since this
man has 17 years of education, he falls into the more
than 12 years of education category. These data can be
found in the top section of the table. (4) Determine the
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
645
Table 4
Final multiple linear regression models for TMT-B
Country
Argentina
Bolivia
Chile
Cuba
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Mexico
Paraguay
Peru
Puerto Rico
B
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
(Constant)
Age
Education
51.634
0.807
–29.406
57.619
2.448
–54.711
36.103
2.124
–52.059
74.942
1.561
–39.878
105.759
1.688
–107.587
120.529
0.901
–87.278
116.223
2.173
–91.081
39.856
1.730
–32.061
62.808
1.464
–41.049
60.927
1.769
–42.591
16.235
2.121
–16.116
Std. Error
t
Sig.
R2
SDe (residual)
6.525
0.116
4.548
12.039
0.194
11.220
10.385
0.167
7.579
11.516
0.198
9.187
14.241
0.232
11.789
17.659
0.305
10.938
14.500
0.270
11.363
5.142
0.087
4.268
12.803
0.222
8.559
10.810
0.182
7.832
12.006
0.200
7.410
7.913
6.946
–6.466
4.786
12.609
–4.876
3.476
12.730
–6.869
6.508
7.892
–4.341
7.426
7.267
–9.126
6.825
2.954
–7.980
8.016
8.058
–8.016
7.751
19.797
–7.513
4.906
6.598
–4.796
5.636
9.693
–5.438
1.352
10.633
–2.175
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.003
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.177
<0.001
0.030
0.247
40.006
0.429
69.661
0.473
55.747
0.221
67.799
0.365
76.508
0.259
77.212
0.488
63.367
0.284
63.387
0.297
48.516
0.380
57.390
0.326
60.506
age range most appropriate for the individual. In this
case, 50 fall into the column 48–52 years of age. (5)
Read down the age range column to find the approximate location of the raw score the person obtained on
the test. Reading down the 48–52 column, the score of
40 obtained by this Argentine man corresponds to an
approximate percentile of 20.
The percentile obtained via this user-friendly table
method (20th) is slightly different than the more exact
one (21st) obtained following the individual conversion
steps above because the table method is based on an age
range (e.g., individuals aged 48–52) instead of the exact
age (individuals aged 50). If the exact score is not listed
in the column, you must estimate the percentile value
from the listed raw scores.
5. Discussion
The purpose of the current study was to generate
normative data on the TMT across 11 countries in
Latin America, with country-specific adjustments
for gender, age, and education, where appropriate.
The final multiple linear regression models explained
between 23–50% of the variance in TMT-A scores
and 22–49% of the variance TMT-B scores. On
the TMT-A, gender differences emerged in several
countries, although only Honduras reached an effect
size greater than 0.3. Similarly, on the TMT-B, there
were several gender differences, but none reached an
effect size of 0.3. Although gender-based norms have
often been used in neuropsychological assessment,
these findings generally conformed to those found in
the research literature showing gender to have little
association with TMT performance (Tombaugh, 2004).
As a result, the performance of the current sample
on the TMT in terms of gender likely is not different
from other normative samples. In light of the previous
literature and because the gender differences in TMT
performance in the current study generally showed
small effect sizes, gender-adjusted norms were not
646
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
generated, except for in Honduras. Except in Honduras
on the TMT-A, gender-adjustments should not be
made in calculating percentiles for the TMT in Latin
America.
Both TMT scores decreased linearly as a function of
education in almost all countries. However, there was no
effect of education for the TMT-A in Puerto Rico. These
general effects of education resonate with the prior
literature showing that education has been inversely
associated with TMT scores (Stuss et al., 1987; Wecker
et al., 2000; Bornstein & Suga, 1988). Therefore, neuropsychologists in Latin America should use educationadjusted norms generated in this study for each country
on the TMT, except in Puerto Rico for the TMT-A.
Various countries in Latin America likely have major
differences in their quality of education, and as a result,
the current TMT education adjustments should be used
in their respective Latin American countries. Perhaps
these differences in education are the largest between
Puerto Rico and the other countries in this study, given
that Puerto Rico is a territory of the United States, and
therefore has one of the more advanced educational systems. This could have accounted for the consistent educational effect on TMT-A scores in all countries except
Puerto Rico.
TMT scores increased with advancing age in all
countries in this study. This robust finding is consistent with the previous literature showing older age to be
associated with higher TMT scores (Stuss et al., 1987;
Wecker et al., 2000; Bornstein & Suga, 1988). When
considering the previous findings, those from the current study suggests that TMT corrections for age should
be made in all Latin American countries tested in this
study.
5.1. Limitations and future directions
The current study has several limitations, and as a
result directions for future research. First, the TMT is
a very common neuropsychological assessment instrument in Latin America, but many other common instruments should be normed following the same procedures
in this study to improve their use in Latin America as
well. Similarly, future studies needs to examine the ecological validity and psychometrics of the TMT and these
other common neuropsychological instruments in Latin
America. Researchers should create instruments within
Latin American cultures with high ecological validity,
considering that the TMT was developed and validated
initially in a Western culture which differs in many ways
from the various cultures present in Latin America.
Developing assessments in the context of local cultures,
instead of simply translating and norming instruments
from other cultural contexts, would represent a crucial
advance in neuropsychological assessment throughout
the region.
Second, neuropsychologists should use caution when
applying the TMT norms from this study in conducting assessments with the TMT in countries other than
those in which data were collected. Future research
needs to create TMT norms in countries in Latin America that were not included in this study, including
Ecuador, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Panama. Despite
this limitation, the TMT norms from the current
study may actually be more accurate in other Latin
American countries than some of the norms that neuropsychologists in those countries currently apply. The
generalizability of the current norms to other Latin
American countries is an important area of future
research.
Third, all participants in the current study spoke
Spanish as a primary language, but they may have spoken secondary languages as well, such as local dialects
or English. TMT performance may be different among
bilingual individuals from Latin America, so future
studies need to examine possible influences of bilingualism on TMT performance. Participants were all
recruited from distinct regions or cities in each country,
instead of nationally within the countries. However, this
was the largest TMT normative study to date in Latin
America, or in any global region, and it is a first step
toward larger, nationally representative studies. The
sample was also limited in that it contained many participants with fewer than 12 years of education, but those
who were unable to read were excluded. As a result,
the current TMT norms may not apply well to illiterate adults, so future studies should be conducted with
illiterate individuals, as well as those with neurological
conditions and children.
Despite these limitations, only limited studies have
produced TMT norms in Spanish-speaking populations
such as Spanish-speakers from Spain (Peña-Casanova
et al., 2009) and Argentina (Fernandez et al., 2002).
Therefore, this study was the first systematic study to
create TMT norms across 11 countries in Latin America with almost 4,000 participants. It was the largest,
most comprehensive TMT normative study to date in
any global region, and its norms have the potential
to improve the standard of neuropsychological assessment with the TMT in Latin America unlike any study
before it.
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
References
Agranovich, A., & Puente, A. (2007). Do Russian and American
normal adults perform similarly on neuropsychological tests?
Preliminary findings on the relationship between culture and
test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3),
273-282.
Amieva, H., Lafont, S., Auriacombe, S., Rainville, C., Orgogozo, J.
M., Dartigues, J. F., & Fabrigoule, C. (1998). Analysis of error
types in the Trial Making Test evidences an inhibitory deficit in
dementia of the Alzheimer type. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20(2), 280-285.
Arbuthnott, K., & Frank, J. (2000). Trail Making Test, Part B
as a measure of executive control: Validation using a setswitching paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental
Neuropsychology, 22(4), 518-528.
Arbuthnott, K., & Frank, J. (2000). Trail Making Test, Part B as a
measure of executive control: Validation using a set-switching
paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 518-528.
Ardila, A. & Moreno, S. (2001). Neuropsychological test performance in Arauco Indians: An exploratory study. Journal of the
International Neuropsychological Society, 7(4), 510-515.
Ardila, A. (1995). Directions of research in crosscultural neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,
17(1), 143-150.
Ardila, A. (2001). The impact of culture on neuropsychological test
performance. Course 13. In Paper presented at 21st annual conference of National Academy of Neuropsychology.
Armitage, S. (1946). Analysis of certain psychological tests used for
the evaluation of brain damage. Psychological Monographs, 60
(1, Whole No. 277).
Army Individual Test Battery. (1944). Manual of Directions and
Scoring. Washington, DC: War Department, Adjutant General’s
Office.
Ashendorf, L., Jefferson, A., O’Connor, M., Chaisson, C., Green, R.,
& Stern, R. (2008). Trail Making Test errors in normal aging,
mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Archives of Clinical
Neuropsychology. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005
Ashendorf, L., Jefferson, A., Oconnor, M., Chaisson, C., Green, R., &
Stern, R. (2008). Trail Making Test errors in normal aging, mild
cognitive impairment, and dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 129-137. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005
Bezdicek, O., Motak, L., Axelrod, B., Preiss, M., Nikolai, T.,
Vyhnalek, M., Poreh, A., & Ruzicka, E. (2012). Czech version
of the Trail Making Test: Normative data and clinical utility.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(8), 906-914.
Bornstein, R., & Suga, L. (1988). Educational level and neuropsychological performance in healthy elderly subjects. Developmental
Neuropsychology, 4(1), 17-22.
Chalermchai, T., Valcour, V., Sithinamsuwan, P., Pinyakorn, S.,
Clifford, D., Paul, R. H., Tipsuk, S., Fletcher, J., DeGruttola, V.,
Ratto-Kim, S., Hutchings, N., Shikuma, C., Ananworanich, J, &
The SEARCH 007 and 011 Study Groups. (2013). Trail Making
Test A improves performance characteristics of the International
HIV Dementia Scale to identify symptomatic HAND. Journal of
NeuroVirology, 19(2), 137-143.
Conn, H. (1977). Trail making and number-connection tests in the
assessment of mental state in portal systemic encephalopathy.
American Journal of Digestive Diseases, 22(6), 541-550.
647
Crowe, S. (1998). The differential contribution of mental tracking,
cognitive flexibility, visual search, and motor speed to performance on parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 585-591.
Drane, D. L., Yuspeh, R. L., Huthwaite, J. S., & Klingler, L. K.
(2002). Demographic characteristics and normative observations
for derived-trail making test indices. Cognitive and Behavioral
Neurology, 15(1), 39-43.
Egeland, J., & Langfjaeran, T. (2007). Differentiating malingering
from genuine cognitive dysfunction using the Trail Making Testratio and Stroop interference scores. Applied Neuropsychology,
14(2), 113-119.
Fernández, A. L., & Marcopulos, B. A. (2008). A comparison of
normative data for the Trail Making Test from several countries: Equivalence of norms and considerations for interpretation.
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 239-246.
Fernández, A., Marino, J. & Alderete, A. (2002). Estandarización y
validez conceptual del Test del Trazo en una muestra de adultos argentinos [Normative data and conceptual validity of the
Trail Making Test in a sample of Argentinean adults]. Revista
Neurológica Argentina, 27(2), 83-88.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Minimental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of
patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3),
189-198.
Golden, C., & Thomas, R. (2000). Cross-cultural application of the
Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Test Battery and Lurian
principles of syndrome analysis. In E. Fletcher-Janzen, T. L.
Strickland, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of CrossCultural Neuropsychology (pp. 305-315). New York: Kluwer/
Plenum.
Goul, W. & Brown, M. (1970). Effects of age and intelligence on Trail
Making Test performance and validity. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 30(1), 319-326.
Guàrdia-Olmos, J., Peró-Cebollero, M., Rivera, D., & ArangoLasprilla, J. C. (2015). Methodology for the development of
normative data for ten Spanish-language neuropsychological tests
in eleven Latin American countries. NeuroRehabilitation, 37,
493-499.
Hashimoto, R., Meguro, K., Lee, E., Kasai, M., Ishii, H., & Yamaguchi, S. (2006). Effect of age and education on the Trail Making
Test and determination of normative data for Japanese elderly people: The Tajiri Project. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences,
60(4), 422-428.
Horton, A. M., & Roberts, C. (2003). Demographic effects on the
Trail Making Test in a drug abuse treatment sample. Archives of
Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(1), 310-213.
Jacobson, S. C., Blanchard, M., Connolly, C. C., Cannon, M., &
Garavan, H. (2011). An fMRI investigation of a novel analogue
to the Trail-Making Test. Brain and Cognition, 77(1), 60-70.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9.
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606-613.
Leininger, B., Gramling, S., Farrell, A., Kreutzer, J., & Peck, E.
(1990). Neuropsychological deficits in symptomatic minor head
injury after concussion and mild concussion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 53(4), 293-296.
Lezak, M., Howieson, D., & Loring, D. (2004). Neuropsychological
assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The
Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 56-61.
648
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
McCaffrey, R., Krahula, M., & Heimberg, R. (1989). An analysis of
the significance of performance errors on the Trail Making Test in
polysubstance users. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4(4),
393-398.
Mitrushina, M. N., Boone, K. B., & D’Ella, L. (1999). Handbook of
Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Pellecchia, M. T., Picillo, M., Santangelo, G., Longo, K., Moccia, M.,
Erro, R., Amboni, M., Vitale, C., Vicidomini, C., Salvatore, M.,
Barone, P., & Pappatá, S. (2015). Cognitive performances and
DAT imaging in early Parkinson’s disease with mild cognitive
impairment: A preliminary study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 131(5), 275-281.
Peña-Casanova, J., Quiñones-Úbeda, S., Quintana-Aparicio, M.,
Aguilar, M., Badenes, D., Molinuevo, J. L., et al. NEURONORMA Study Team. (2009). Spanish Multicenter Normative
Studies (NEURONORMA Project): Norms for verbal span, visuospatial span, letter and number sequencing, trail making test, and
symbol digit modalities test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(4), 321-341.
Periañez, J. A., Rios-Lago, M., Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. M., AdroverRoig, D., Sanchez-Cubillo, I., Crespo-Farroco, B., Quemada, J.,
& Barcelo, F. (2007). Trail Making Test in traumatic brain injury,
schizophrenia, and normal ageing: Sample comparisons and normative data. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 433-447.
Pillon, B., Gouider-Khouja, N., Deweer, B., Vidailhet, M., Malapani,
C., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1995). Neuropsychological pattern
of striatonigral degeneration: Comparison with Parkinson’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Journal of Neurology,
Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 58(2), 174-179.
Rabin, L., Barr, W., & Burton, L. (2005). Assessment practices of
clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A
survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of
Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(1), 33-65.
Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead–Reitan Neuropsycholgical Test Battery: Therapy and Clinical Interpretation.
Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychological Press.
Riggio, O., Ridola, L., Pasquale, C., Nardelli, S., Pentassuglio, I.,
Moscucci, F., & Merli, M. (2011). Evidence of persistent cognitive impairment after resolution of overt hepatic encephalopathy.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 9(2), 181-183.
Sanchez-Cubillo, I., Periañez, J. A., Adrover-Roig, D., RodriguezSanchez, J. M., Rios-Lago, M., Tirapu, J., & Barcelo, F. (2009).
Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: Role of taskswitching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and
visuomotor abilities. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(03), 438-450.
Selnes, O., Jaconson, L., Machado, A., Becker, J., Wesch, J., Miller,
E., Visscher, B., & McArthur, J. (1991). Normative data for a brief
neuropsychological screening battery. Multicenter AIDS Cohort
Study. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 73(2), 539-550.
Seo, E., Lee, D., Kim, K., Lee, J., Jhoo, J., Youn, J., Choo, I., Ha,
J., & Woo, J. (2006). A normative study of the Trail Making Test
in Korean elders. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,
21(9), 844-852.
Spreen, O., & Benton, A. (1965). Comparative studies of some psychological tests for cerebral damage. Journal of Nervous and
Mental Disease, 140(5), 323-333.
Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary (2nd ed.).
New York: Oxford University Press.
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of
neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York. Oxford University Press.
Stuss, D. T., Stethem, L. L., & Poirier, C. A. (1987). Comparison of
three tests of attention and rapid information processing across
six age groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1(2), 139-152.
Terada, S., Sato, S., Nagao, S., Ikeda, C., Shindo, A., Hayashi, S.,
Oshima, E., Yokota, O., & Uchitomi, Y. (2013). Trail Making Test
B and brain perfusion imaging in mild cognitive impairment and
mild Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging,
213(3), 249-255.
Thaler, N. S., Allen, D. N., Hart, J. S., Boucher, J. R., McMurray, J.
C., & Mayfield, J. (2012). Neurocognitive correlates of the Trail
Making Test for older children in patients with traumatic brain
injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 446-452.
Tombaugh, T. (2004). Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data
stratified by age and education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(2), 203-214.
Wagner, S., Helmreich, I., Dahmen, N., Lieb, K., & Tadić, A. (2011).
Reliability of three alternate forms of the trail making tests a and
B. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(4), 314-321.
Wang, Q., Sun, J., Ma, X., Wang, Y., Yao, J., Deng, W., Liu, X.,
Collier, D., & Li, T. (2011). Normative data on a battery of neuropsychological tests in the Han Chinese population. Journal of
Neuropsychology, 5(1), 126-142.
Wecker, N. S., Kramer, J. H., Wisniewski, A., Delis, D., & Kaplan, E.
(2000). Age effects on executive ability. Neuropsychology, 14(3),
409-414.
Woods, D. L., Wyma, J. M., Herron, T. J., & Yund, E. W. (2015).
The Effects of Aging, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury
on Computerized Trail-Making Test Performance. PLoS ONE,
10(6), e0124345. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124345
Yochim, B., Baldo, J., Nelson, A., & Delis, D. C. (2007). D-KEFS
Trail Making Test performance in patients with lateral prefrontal
cortex lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological
Society, 13(04), 704-709.
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
649
Appendix
Table A1
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for ARGENTINA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
8.0
11.7
14.1
16.2
19.5
22.3
24.8
27.4
30.2
33.4
35.5
38.0
41.7
9.1
12.8
15.3
17.3
20.6
23.4
26.0
28.5
31.3
34.6
36.6
39.1
42.8
10.3
14.0
16.4
18.5
21.8
24.5
27.1
29.7
32.4
35.7
37.8
40.2
43.9
11.4
15.1
17.6
19.6
22.9
25.7
28.2
30.8
33.6
36.9
38.9
41.4
45.1
12.5
16.2
18.7
20.8
24.0
26.8
29.4
31.9
34.7
38.0
40.1
42.5
46.2
13.7
17.4
19.8
21.9
25.2
28.0
30.5
33.1
35.9
39.1
41.2
43.7
47.4
14.8
18.5
21.0
23.0
26.3
29.1
31.7
34.2
37.0
40.3
42.3
44.8
48.5
16.0
19.7
22.1
24.2
27.5
30.2
32.8
35.4
38.1
41.4
43.5
45.9
49.6
17.1
20.8
23.3
25.3
28.6
31.4
33.9
36.5
39.3
42.6
44.6
47.1
50.8
18.2
21.9
24.4
26.5
29.7
32.5
35.1
37.6
40.4
43.7
45.8
48.2
51.9
19.4
23.1
25.5
27.6
30.9
33.7
36.2
38.8
41.6
44.8
46.9
49.4
53.1
20.5
24.2
26.7
28.7
32.0
34.8
37.4
39.9
42.7
46.0
48.0
50.5
54.2
21.7
25.4
27.8
29.9
33.2
35.9
38.5
41.1
43.8
47.1
49.2
51.6
55.3
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
14.1
17.8
20.3
22.3
25.6
28.4
31.0
33.5
36.3
39.6
41.6
44.1
47.8
15.3
19.0
21.4
23.5
26.8
29.5
32.1
34.7
37.4
40.7
42.8
45.2
48.9
16.4
20.1
22.6
24.6
27.9
30.7
33.2
35.8
38.6
41.9
43.9
46.4
50.1
17.6
21.3
23.7
25.8
29.1
31.8
34.4
37.0
39.7
43.0
45.1
47.5
51.2
18.7
22.4
24.9
26.9
30.2
33.0
35.5
38.1
40.9
44.1
46.2
48.7
52.4
19.8
23.5
26.0
28.0
31.3
34.1
36.7
39.2
42.0
45.3
47.3
49.8
53.5
21.0
24.7
27.1
29.2
32.5
35.2
37.8
40.4
43.1
46.4
48.5
50.9
54.6
22.1
25.8
28.3
30.3
33.6
36.4
38.9
41.5
44.3
47.6
49.6
52.1
55.8
23.3
26.9
29.4
31.5
34.7
37.5
40.1
42.7
45.4
48.7
50.8
53.2
56.9
24.4
28.1
30.6
32.6
35.9
38.7
41.2
43.8
46.6
49.8
51.9
54.4
58.1
25.5
29.2
31.7
33.7
37.0
39.8
42.4
44.9
47.7
51.0
53.0
55.5
59.2
26.7
30.4
32.8
34.9
38.2
40.9
43.5
46.1
48.8
52.1
54.2
56.6
60.3
27.8
31.5
34.0
36.0
39.3
42.1
44.6
47.2
50.0
53.3
55.3
57.8
61.5
Table A2
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for BOLIVIA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
13.6
20.6
25.2
29.0
35.2
40.4
45.2
50.0
55.2
61.4
65.2
69.9
76.8
16.6
23.5
28.1
32.0
38.1
43.3
48.2
53.0
58.2
64.3
68.2
72.8
79.7
19.5
26.4
31.1
34.9
41.1
46.3
51.1
55.9
61.1
67.3
71.1
75.7
82.7
22.5
29.4
34.0
37.9
44.0
49.2
54.0
58.8
64.0
70.2
74.1
78.7
85.6
25.4
32.3
36.9
40.8
47.0
52.2
57.0
61.8
67.0
73.1
77.0
81.6
88.5
28.3
35.3
39.9
43.7
49.9
55.1
59.9
64.7
69.9
76.1
79.9
84.6
91.5
31.3
38.2
42.8
46.7
52.8
58.0
62.9
67.7
72.9
79.0
82.9
87.5
94.4
34.2
41.1
45.8
49.6
55.8
61.0
65.8
70.6
75.8
82.0
85.8
90.4
97.4
37.2
44.1
48.7
52.6
58.7
63.9
68.7
73.5
78.7
84.9
88.8
93.4
100.0
40.1
47.0
51.6
55.5
61.7
66.9
71.7
76.5
81.7
87.8
91.7
96.3
100.0
43.0
50.0
54.6
58.4
64.6
69.8
74.6
79.4
84.6
90.8
94.6
99.3
100.0
46.0
52.9
57.5
61.4
67.5
72.7
77.6
82.4
87.6
93.7
97.6
100.0
–
48.9
55.8
60.5
64.3
70.5
75.7
80.5
85.3
90.5
96.7
100.0
–
–
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
24.6
31.6
36.2
40.1
46.2
51.4
56.2
61.0
66.2
72.4
76.3
80.9
87.8
27.6
34.5
39.1
43.0
49.2
54.4
59.2
64.0
69.2
75.3
79.2
83.8
90.7
30.5
37.5
42.1
45.9
52.1
57.3
62.1
66.9
72.1
78.3
82.1
86.8
93.7
33.5
40.4
45.0
48.9
55.0
60.2
65.0
69.9
75.1
81.2
85.1
89.7
96.6
36.4
43.3
48.0
51.8
58.0
63.2
68.0
72.8
78.0
84.2
88.0
92.6
99.6
39.3
46.3
50.9
54.8
60.9
66.1
70.9
75.7
80.9
87.1
91.0
95.6
100.0
42.3
49.2
53.8
57.7
63.9
69.1
73.9
78.7
83.9
90.0
93.9
98.5
100.0
45.2
52.2
56.8
60.6
66.8
72.0
76.8
81.6
86.8
93.0
96.8
100.0
–
48.2
55.1
59.7
63.6
69.7
74.9
79.7
84.6
89.8
95.9
99.8
100.0
–
51.1
58.0
62.7
66.5
72.7
77.9
82.7
87.5
92.7
98.9
100.0
–
–
54.0
61.0
65.6
69.5
75.6
80.8
85.6
90.4
95.6
100.0
–
–
–
57.0
63.9
68.5
72.4
78.6
83.8
88.6
93.4
98.6
100.0
–
–
–
59.9
66.9
71.5
75.3
81.5
86.7
91.5
96.3
100.0
–
–
–
–
650
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table A3
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for CHILE
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
5.6
11.1
15.7
20.0
24.3
28.9
34.4
37.9
42.0
48.2
–
–
5.4
8.8
14.3
18.9
23.2
27.5
32.1
37.6
41.1
45.2
51.4
–
4.4
8.6
12.0
17.5
22.1
26.4
30.7
35.3
40.8
44.3
48.4
54.6
–
7.6
11.8
15.2
20.7
25.3
29.6
33.9
38.5
44.0
47.4
51.6
57.7
4.7
10.8
15.0
18.4
23.9
28.5
32.8
37.1
41.7
47.2
50.6
54.8
60.9
7.9
14.0
18.1
21.6
27.1
31.7
36.0
40.3
44.9
50.4
53.8
58.0
64.1
11.0
17.2
21.3
24.8
30.3
34.9
39.2
43.5
48.1
53.6
57.0
61.1
67.3
14.2
20.4
24.5
28.0
33.5
38.1
42.4
46.7
51.3
56.8
60.2
64.3
70.5
17.4
23.6
27.7
31.2
36.7
41.3
45.6
49.9
54.5
60.0
63.4
67.5
73.7
20.6
26.8
30.9
34.4
39.8
44.5
48.8
53.1
57.7
63.2
66.6
70.7
76.9
23.8
30.0
34.1
37.5
43.0
47.7
52.0
56.3
60.9
66.4
69.8
73.9
80.1
27.0
33.2
37.3
40.7
46.2
50.9
55.2
59.4
64.1
69.6
73.0
77.1
83.3
30.2
36.4
40.5
43.9
49.4
54.1
58.3
62.6
67.3
72.8
76.2
80.3
86.5
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
7.0
13.2
17.3
20.7
26.2
30.8
35.1
39.4
44.0
49.5
53.0
57.1
63.3
10.2
16.3
20.5
23.9
29.4
34.0
38.3
42.6
47.2
52.7
56.2
60.3
66.4
13.4
19.5
23.7
27.1
32.6
37.2
41.5
45.8
50.4
55.9
59.3
63.5
69.6
16.6
22.7
26.9
30.3
35.8
40.4
44.7
49.0
53.6
59.1
62.5
66.7
72.8
19.7
25.9
30.0
33.5
39.0
43.6
47.9
52.2
56.8
62.3
65.7
69.9
76.0
22.9
29.1
33.2
36.7
42.2
46.8
51.1
55.4
60.0
65.5
68.9
73.0
79.2
26.1
32.3
36.4
39.9
45.4
50.0
54.3
58.6
63.2
68.7
72.1
76.2
82.4
29.3
35.5
39.6
43.1
48.5
53.2
57.5
61.8
66.4
71.9
75.3
79.4
85.6
32.5
38.7
42.8
46.3
51.7
56.4
60.7
65.0
69.6
75.1
78.5
82.6
88.8
35.7
41.9
46.0
49.4
54.9
59.6
63.9
68.1
72.8
78.3
81.7
85.8
92.0
38.9
45.1
49.2
52.6
58.1
62.8
67.1
71.3
76.0
81.5
84.9
89.0
95.2
42.1
48.3
52.4
55.8
61.3
66.0
70.2
74.5
79.2
84.7
88.1
92.2
98.4
45.3
51.5
55.6
59.0
64.5
69.2
73.4
77.7
82.4
87.9
91.3
95.4
100.0
Table A4
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for CUBA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
5.7
12.3
16.7
20.4
26.3
31.3
35.9
40.5
45.5
51.4
55.1
59.5
66.1
8.6
15.3
19.7
23.4
29.3
34.2
38.8
43.4
48.4
54.3
58.0
62.4
69.1
11.6
18.2
22.6
26.3
32.2
37.2
41.8
46.4
51.4
57.3
61.0
65.4
72.0
14.5
21.2
25.6
29.3
35.2
40.1
44.7
49.4
54.3
60.2
63.9
68.3
75.0
17.5
24.1
28.5
32.2
38.1
43.1
47.7
52.3
57.3
63.2
66.9
71.3
77.9
20.4
27.1
31.5
35.2
41.1
46.0
50.6
55.3
60.2
66.1
69.8
74.2
80.9
23.4
30.0
34.4
38.1
44.0
49.0
53.6
58.2
63.2
69.1
72.8
77.2
83.8
26.3
33.0
37.4
41.1
47.0
51.9
56.6
61.2
66.1
72.0
75.7
80.1
86.8
29.3
35.9
40.3
44.0
49.9
54.9
59.5
64.1
69.1
75.0
78.7
83.1
89.7
32.2
38.9
43.3
47.0
52.9
57.8
62.5
67.1
72.0
77.9
81.6
86.0
92.7
35.2
41.8
46.2
49.9
55.8
60.8
65.4
70.0
75.0
80.9
84.6
89.0
95.6
38.1
44.8
49.2
52.9
58.8
63.8
68.4
73.0
77.9
83.8
87.5
91.9
98.6
41.1
47.7
52.2
55.8
61.7
66.7
71.3
75.9
80.9
86.8
90.5
94.9
100.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
16.2
22.8
27.2
30.9
36.8
41.8
46.4
51.0
55.9
61.8
65.5
69.9
76.6
19.1
25.7
30.2
33.8
39.7
44.7
49.3
53.9
58.9
64.8
68.5
72.9
79.5
22.1
28.7
33.1
36.8
42.7
47.7
52.3
56.9
61.8
67.7
71.4
75.8
82.5
25.0
31.6
36.1
39.7
45.6
50.6
55.2
59.8
64.8
70.7
74.4
78.8
85.4
28.0
34.6
39.0
42.7
48.6
53.6
58.2
62.8
67.8
73.6
77.3
81.8
88.4
30.9
37.5
42.0
45.6
51.5
56.5
61.1
65.7
70.7
76.6
80.3
84.7
91.3
33.9
40.5
44.9
48.6
54.5
59.5
64.1
68.7
73.7
79.5
83.2
87.7
94.3
36.8
43.4
47.9
51.6
57.4
62.4
67.0
71.6
76.6
82.5
86.2
90.6
97.2
39.8
46.4
50.8
54.5
60.4
65.4
70.0
74.6
79.6
85.5
89.1
93.6
100.0
42.7
49.3
53.8
57.5
63.4
68.3
72.9
77.5
82.5
88.4
92.1
96.5
100.0
45.7
52.3
56.7
60.4
66.3
71.3
75.9
80.5
85.5
91.4
95.0
99.5
100.0
48.6
55.3
59.7
63.4
69.3
74.2
78.8
83.4
88.4
94.3
98.0
100.0
–
51.6
58.2
62.6
66.3
72.2
77.2
81.8
86.4
91.4
97.3
100.0
–
–
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
651
Table A5
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for EL SALVADOR
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
5.0
8.9
15.1
20.3
25.2
30.1
35.3
41.5
45.4
50.1
57.1
–
–
7.6
11.5
17.7
22.9
27.8
32.7
37.9
44.1
48.0
52.7
59.7
–
5.5
10.2
14.1
20.3
25.5
30.4
35.3
40.5
46.7
50.6
55.3
62.3
–
8.1
12.8
16.7
22.9
28.2
33.0
37.9
43.1
49.4
53.2
57.9
64.9
3.7
10.7
15.4
19.3
25.5
30.8
35.6
40.5
45.7
52.0
55.9
60.5
67.5
6.3
13.3
18.0
21.9
28.1
33.4
38.2
43.1
48.3
54.6
58.5
63.1
70.1
8.9
15.9
20.6
24.5
30.7
36.0
40.8
45.7
51.0
57.2
61.1
65.7
72.7
11.5
18.5
23.2
27.1
33.3
38.6
43.4
48.3
53.6
59.8
63.7
68.3
75.3
14.2
21.2
25.8
29.7
35.9
41.2
46.1
50.9
56.2
62.4
66.3
70.9
78.0
16.8
23.8
28.4
32.3
38.5
43.8
48.7
53.5
58.8
65.0
68.9
73.6
80.6
19.4
26.4
31.0
34.9
41.2
46.4
51.3
56.1
61.4
67.6
71.5
76.2
83.2
22.0
29.0
33.6
37.5
43.8
49.0
53.9
58.7
64.0
70.2
74.1
78.8
85.8
24.6
31.6
36.3
40.1
46.4
51.6
56.5
61.3
66.6
72.8
76.7
81.4
88.4
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
21.8
28.8
33.4
37.3
43.5
48.8
53.7
58.5
63.8
70.0
73.9
78.6
85.6
24.4
31.4
36.0
39.9
46.1
51.4
56.3
61.1
66.4
72.6
76.5
81.2
88.2
27.0
34.0
38.6
42.5
48.8
54.0
58.9
63.7
69.0
75.2
79.1
83.8
90.8
29.6
36.6
41.2
45.1
51.4
56.6
61.5
66.3
71.6
77.8
81.7
86.4
93.4
32.2
39.2
43.9
47.7
54.0
59.2
64.1
68.9
74.2
80.4
84.3
89.0
96.0
34.8
41.8
46.5
50.4
56.6
61.8
66.7
71.6
76.8
83.0
86.9
91.6
98.6
37.4
44.4
49.1
53.0
59.2
64.4
69.3
74.2
79.4
85.6
89.5
94.2
100.0
40.0
47.0
51.7
55.6
61.8
67.0
71.9
76.8
82.0
88.2
92.1
96.8
100.0
42.6
49.6
54.3
58.2
64.4
69.7
74.5
79.4
84.6
90.9
94.7
99.4
100.0
45.2
52.2
56.9
60.8
67.0
72.3
77.1
82.0
87.2
93.5
97.3
100.0
–
47.8
54.8
59.5
63.4
69.6
74.9
79.7
84.6
89.8
96.1
100.0
–
–
50.4
57.4
62.1
66.0
72.2
77.5
82.3
87.2
92.4
98.7
100.0
–
–
53.0
60.0
64.7
68.6
74.8
80.1
84.9
89.8
95.1
100.0
–
–
–
Table A6
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for GUATEMALA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
3.2
7.3
13.9
19.5
24.6
29.8
35.4
42.0
46.1
51.0
58.4
–
–
5.4
9.6
16.2
21.7
26.9
32.0
37.6
44.2
48.3
53.3
60.7
–
–
7.7
11.8
18.4
23.9
29.1
34.2
39.8
46.4
50.5
55.5
62.9
–
4.9
9.9
14.0
20.6
26.2
31.3
36.5
42.0
48.6
52.8
57.7
65.1
–
7.2
12.1
16.2
22.8
28.4
33.5
38.7
44.3
50.9
55.0
59.9
67.3
–
9.4
14.3
18.5
25.1
30.6
35.8
40.9
46.5
53.1
57.2
62.1
69.6
4.2
11.6
16.6
20.7
27.3
32.8
38.0
43.1
48.7
55.3
59.4
64.4
71.8
6.4
13.8
18.8
22.9
29.5
35.1
40.2
45.4
50.9
57.5
61.7
66.6
74.0
8.6
16.1
21.0
25.1
31.7
37.3
42.4
47.6
53.2
59.8
63.9
68.8
76.2
10.9
18.3
23.2
27.4
34.0
39.5
44.7
49.8
55.4
62.0
66.1
71.0
78.5
13.1
20.5
25.5
29.6
36.2
41.7
46.9
52.0
57.6
64.2
68.3
73.3
80.7
15.3
22.7
27.7
31.8
38.4
44.0
49.1
54.3
59.8
66.4
70.5
75.5
82.9
17.5
25.0
29.9
34.0
40.6
46.2
51.3
56.5
62.1
68.7
72.8
77.7
85.1
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
12.5
19.9
24.8
29.0
35.6
41.1
46.3
51.4
57.0
63.6
67.7
72.6
80.1
14.7
22.1
27.1
31.2
37.8
43.3
48.5
53.6
59.2
65.8
69.9
74.9
82.3
16.9
24.3
29.3
33.4
40.0
45.6
50.7
55.9
61.4
68.0
72.2
77.1
84.5
19.1
26.6
31.5
35.6
42.2
47.8
52.9
58.1
63.7
70.3
74.4
79.3
86.7
21.4
28.8
33.7
37.9
44.4
50.0
55.2
60.3
65.9
72.5
76.6
81.5
89.0
23.6
31.0
36.0
40.1
46.7
52.2
57.4
62.5
68.1
74.7
78.8
83.8
91.2
25.8
33.2
38.2
42.3
48.9
54.5
59.6
64.8
70.3
76.9
81.0
86.0
93.4
28.0
35.5
40.4
44.5
51.1
56.7
61.8
67.0
72.6
79.2
83.3
88.2
95.6
30.3
37.7
42.6
46.8
53.3
58.9
64.1
69.2
74.8
81.4
85.5
90.4
97.9
32.5
39.9
44.9
49.0
55.6
61.1
66.3
71.4
77.0
83.6
87.7
92.7
100.0
34.7
42.1
47.1
51.2
57.8
63.4
68.5
73.7
79.2
85.8
89.9
94.9
100.0
36.9
44.4
49.3
53.4
60.0
65.6
70.7
75.9
81.5
88.0
92.2
97.1
100.0
39.2
46.6
51.5
55.7
62.2
67.8
73.0
78.1
83.7
90.3
94.4
99.3
100.0
652
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table A7
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels and gender for HONDURAS: MALES only
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
13.0
19.4
23.7
27.3
33.0
37.8
42.3
46.7
51.6
57.3
60.8
65.1
71.5
14.9
21.3
25.6
29.1
34.8
39.7
44.1
48.6
53.4
59.1
62.7
67.0
73.4
16.7
23.1
27.4
31.0
36.7
41.5
46.0
50.4
55.2
61.0
64.5
68.8
75.2
18.6
25.0
29.3
32.8
38.5
43.4
47.8
52.3
57.1
62.8
66.4
70.6
77.1
20.4
26.8
31.1
34.7
40.4
45.2
49.7
54.1
58.9
64.6
68.2
72.5
78.9
22.3
28.7
33.0
36.5
42.2
47.1
51.5
56.0
60.8
66.5
70.1
74.3
80.8
24.1
30.5
34.8
38.4
44.1
48.9
53.4
57.8
62.6
68.3
71.9
76.2
82.6
26.0
32.4
36.7
40.2
45.9
50.7
55.2
59.7
64.5
70.2
73.8
78.0
84.5
27.8
34.2
38.5
42.1
47.8
52.6
57.1
61.5
66.3
72.0
75.6
79.9
86.3
29.7
36.1
40.4
43.9
49.6
54.4
58.9
63.4
68.2
73.9
77.5
81.7
88.2
31.5
37.9
42.2
45.8
51.5
56.3
60.7
65.2
70.0
75.7
79.3
83.6
90.0
33.3
39.8
44.0
47.6
53.3
58.1
62.6
67.1
71.9
77.6
81.1
85.4
91.8
35.2
41.6
45.9
49.5
55.2
60.0
64.4
68.9
73.7
79.4
83.0
87.3
93.7
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
35.9
42.4
46.6
50.2
55.9
60.7
65.2
69.7
74.5
80.2
83.7
88.0
94.5
37.8
44.2
48.5
52.1
57.8
62.6
67.0
71.5
76.3
82.0
85.6
89.9
96.3
39.6
46.1
50.3
53.9
59.6
64.4
68.9
73.4
78.2
83.9
87.4
91.7
98.1
41.5
47.9
52.2
55.8
61.5
66.3
70.7
75.2
80.0
85.7
89.3
93.6
100.0
43.3
49.8
54.0
57.6
63.3
68.1
72.6
77.0
81.9
87.6
91.1
95.4
100.0
45.2
51.6
55.9
59.5
65.2
70.0
74.4
78.9
83.7
89.4
93.0
97.3
100.0
47.0
53.5
57.7
61.3
67.0
71.8
76.3
80.7
85.6
91.3
94.8
99.1
100.0
48.9
55.3
59.6
63.1
68.9
73.7
78.1
82.6
87.4
93.1
96.7
100.0
–
50.7
57.1
61.4
65.0
70.7
75.5
80.0
84.4
89.3
95.0
98.5
100.0
–
52.6
59.0
63.3
66.8
72.5
77.4
81.8
86.3
91.1
96.8
100.0
–
–
54.4
60.8
65.1
68.7
74.4
79.2
83.7
88.1
92.9
98.7
100.0
–
–
56.3
62.7
67.0
70.5
76.2
81.1
85.5
90.0
94.8
100.0
–
–
–
58.1
64.5
68.8
72.4
78.1
82.9
87.4
91.8
96.6
100.0
–
–
–
Table A8
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age education level, and gender for HONDURAS: FEMALES only
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
23.3
29.8
34.0
37.6
43.3
48.1
52.6
57.0
61.9
67.6
71.1
75.4
81.8
25.2
31.6
35.9
39.5
45.2
50.0
54.4
58.9
63.7
69.4
73.0
77.3
83.7
27.0
33.5
37.7
41.3
47.0
51.8
56.3
60.7
65.6
71.3
74.8
79.1
85.5
28.9
35.3
39.6
43.2
48.9
53.7
58.1
62.6
67.4
73.1
76.7
81.0
87.4
30.7
37.1
41.4
45.0
50.7
55.5
60.0
64.4
69.3
75.0
78.5
82.8
89.2
32.6
39.0
43.3
46.8
52.6
57.4
61.8
66.3
71.1
76.8
80.4
84.7
91.1
34.4
40.8
45.1
48.7
54.4
59.2
63.7
68.1
72.9
78.7
82.2
86.5
92.9
36.3
42.7
47.0
50.5
56.2
61.1
65.5
70.0
74.8
80.5
84.1
88.4
94.8
38.1
44.5
48.8
52.4
58.1
62.9
67.4
71.8
76.6
82.4
85.9
90.2
96.6
40.0
46.4
50.7
54.2
59.9
64.8
69.2
73.7
78.5
84.2
87.8
92.0
98.5
41.8
48.2
52.5
56.1
61.8
66.6
71.1
75.5
80.3
86.0
89.6
93.9
100.0
43.7
50.1
54.4
57.9
63.6
68.5
72.9
77.4
82.2
87.9
91.5
95.7
100.0
45.5
51.9
56.2
59.8
65.5
70.3
74.8
79.2
84.0
89.7
93.3
97.6
100.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
46.3
52.7
57.0
60.5
66.2
71.1
75.5
80.0
84.8
90.5
94.1
98.3
100.0
48.1
54.5
58.8
62.4
68.1
72.9
77.4
81.8
86.6
92.3
95.9
100.0
–
50.0
56.4
60.7
64.2
69.9
74.7
79.2
83.7
88.5
94.2
97.8
100.0
–
51.8
58.2
62.5
66.1
71.8
76.6
81.1
85.5
90.3
96.0
99.6
100.0
–
53.7
60.1
64.4
67.9
73.6
78.4
82.9
87.4
92.2
97.9
100.0
–
–
55.5
61.9
66.2
69.8
75.5
80.3
84.7
89.2
94.0
99.7
100.0
–
–
57.3
63.8
68.0
71.6
77.3
82.1
86.6
91.1
95.9
100.0
–
–
–
59.2
65.6
69.9
73.5
79.2
84.0
88.4
92.9
97.7
100.0
–
–
–
61.0
67.5
71.7
75.3
81.0
85.8
90.3
94.7
99.6
100.0
–
–
–
62.9
69.3
73.6
77.2
82.9
87.7
92.1
96.6
100.0
–
–
–
–
64.7
71.2
75.4
79.0
84.7
89.5
94.0
98.4
100.0
–
–
–
–
66.6
73.0
77.3
80.8
86.6
91.4
95.8
100.0
–
–
–
–
–
68.4
74.8
79.1
82.7
88.4
93.2
97.7
100.0
–
–
–
–
–
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
653
Table A9
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for MEXICO
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
5.9
10.4
14.2
20.2
25.2
29.9
34.6
39.6
45.6
49.4
53.9
60.6
–
9.1
13.6
17.4
23.4
28.4
33.1
37.8
42.9
48.9
52.6
57.1
63.8
5.6
12.4
16.9
20.6
26.6
31.7
36.3
41.0
46.1
52.1
55.8
60.3
67.1
8.8
15.6
20.1
23.8
29.8
34.9
39.6
44.2
49.3
55.3
59.0
63.5
70.3
12.1
18.8
23.3
27.0
33.0
38.1
42.8
47.5
52.5
58.5
62.3
66.8
73.5
15.3
22.0
26.5
30.3
36.3
41.3
46.0
50.7
55.7
61.7
65.5
70.0
76.7
18.5
25.2
29.7
33.5
39.5
44.5
49.2
53.9
59.0
64.9
68.7
73.2
79.9
21.7
28.5
32.9
36.7
42.7
47.7
52.4
57.1
62.2
68.2
71.9
76.4
83.2
24.9
31.7
36.2
39.9
45.9
51.0
55.6
60.3
65.4
71.4
75.1
79.6
86.4
28.1
34.9
39.4
43.1
49.1
54.2
58.9
63.5
68.6
74.6
78.3
82.8
89.6
31.4
38.1
42.6
46.3
52.3
57.4
62.1
66.8
71.8
77.8
81.6
86.1
92.8
34.6
41.3
45.8
49.6
55.6
60.6
65.3
70.0
75.0
81.0
84.8
89.3
96.0
37.8
44.5
49.0
52.8
58.8
63.8
68.5
73.2
78.3
84.3
88.0
92.5
99.2
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
7.5
14.3
18.7
22.5
28.5
33.5
38.2
42.9
48.0
54.0
57.7
62.2
69.0
10.7
17.5
22.0
25.7
31.7
36.8
41.4
46.1
51.2
57.2
60.9
65.4
72.2
13.9
20.7
25.2
28.9
34.9
40.0
44.7
49.3
54.4
60.4
64.1
68.6
75.4
17.2
23.9
28.4
32.1
38.1
43.2
47.9
52.6
57.6
63.6
67.4
71.9
78.6
20.4
27.1
31.6
35.4
41.4
46.4
51.1
55.8
60.8
66.8
70.6
75.1
81.8
23.6
30.3
34.8
38.6
44.6
49.6
54.3
59.0
64.1
70.1
73.8
78.3
85.0
26.8
33.6
38.1
41.8
47.8
52.9
57.5
62.2
67.3
73.3
77.0
81.5
88.3
30.0
36.8
41.3
45.0
51.0
56.1
60.8
65.4
70.5
76.5
80.2
84.7
91.5
33.3
40.0
44.5
48.2
54.2
59.3
64.0
68.7
73.7
79.7
83.5
88.0
94.7
36.5
43.2
47.7
51.5
57.5
62.5
67.2
71.9
76.9
82.9
86.7
91.2
97.9
39.7
46.4
50.9
54.7
60.7
65.7
70.4
75.1
80.2
86.1
89.9
94.4
100.0
42.9
49.7
54.1
57.9
63.9
68.9
73.6
78.3
83.4
89.4
93.1
97.6
100.0
46.1
52.9
57.4
61.1
67.1
72.2
76.8
81.5
86.6
92.6
96.3
100.0
–
Table A10
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for PARAGUAY
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
2.8
8.2
11.8
14.8
19.6
23.6
27.4
31.1
35.2
39.9
42.9
46.5
51.9
5.6
11.0
14.6
17.6
22.3
26.4
30.1
33.9
37.9
42.7
45.7
49.3
54.7
8.3
13.7
17.3
20.3
25.1
29.1
32.9
36.6
40.7
45.5
48.5
52.0
57.4
11.1
16.5
20.1
23.1
27.9
31.9
35.6
39.4
43.4
48.2
51.2
54.8
60.2
13.8
19.2
22.8
25.8
30.6
34.6
38.4
42.1
46.2
51.0
54.0
57.6
62.9
16.6
22.0
25.6
28.6
33.4
37.4
41.1
44.9
48.9
53.7
56.7
60.3
65.7
19.4
24.7
28.3
31.3
36.1
40.2
43.9
47.6
51.7
56.5
59.5
63.1
68.5
22.1
27.5
31.1
34.1
38.9
42.9
46.7
50.4
54.4
59.2
62.2
65.8
71.2
24.9
30.2
33.8
36.8
41.6
45.7
49.4
53.2
57.2
62.0
65.0
68.6
74.0
27.6
33.0
36.6
39.6
44.4
48.4
52.2
55.9
59.9
64.7
67.7
71.3
76.7
30.4
35.8
39.4
42.3
47.1
51.2
54.9
58.7
62.7
67.5
70.5
74.1
79.5
33.1
38.5
42.1
45.1
49.9
53.9
57.7
61.4
65.5
70.2
73.2
76.8
82.2
35.9
41.3
44.9
47.9
52.6
56.7
60.4
64.2
68.2
73.0
76.0
79.6
85.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
28.2
33.6
37.2
40.2
45.0
49.1
52.8
56.5
60.6
65.4
68.4
72.0
77.3
31.0
36.4
40.0
43.0
47.8
51.8
55.6
59.3
63.3
68.1
71.1
74.7
80.1
33.8
39.1
42.7
45.7
50.5
54.6
58.3
62.0
66.1
70.9
73.9
77.5
82.9
36.5
41.9
45.5
48.5
53.3
57.3
61.1
64.8
68.8
73.6
76.6
80.2
85.6
39.3
44.7
48.2
51.2
56.0
60.1
63.8
67.6
71.6
76.4
79.4
83.0
88.4
42.0
47.4
51.0
54.0
58.8
62.8
66.6
70.3
74.4
79.1
82.1
85.7
91.1
44.8
50.2
53.8
56.8
61.5
65.6
69.3
73.1
77.1
81.9
84.9
88.5
93.9
47.5
52.9
56.5
59.5
64.3
68.3
72.1
75.8
79.9
84.7
87.6
91.2
96.6
50.3
55.7
59.3
62.3
67.1
71.1
74.8
78.6
82.6
87.4
90.4
94.0
99.4
53.0
58.4
62.0
65.0
69.8
73.8
77.6
81.3
85.4
90.2
93.2
96.8
100.0
55.8
61.2
64.8
67.8
72.6
76.6
80.3
84.1
88.1
92.9
95.9
99.5
100.0
58.5
63.9
67.5
70.5
75.3
79.4
83.1
86.8
90.9
95.7
98.7
100.0
–
61.3
66.7
70.3
73.3
78.1
82.1
85.9
89.6
93.6
98.4
100.0
100.0
–
654
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table A11
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age and education levels for PERU
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
3.3
9.5
13.5
16.9
22.4
26.9
31.2
35.4
40.0
45.4
48.8
52.9
59.0
6.3
12.5
16.5
19.9
25.4
29.9
34.2
38.4
43.0
48.4
51.8
55.9
62.0
9.3
15.5
19.5
22.9
28.4
32.9
37.2
41.4
46.0
51.4
54.8
58.9
65.0
12.3
18.5
22.5
25.9
31.4
35.9
40.2
44.4
49.0
54.4
57.8
61.9
68.0
15.3
21.4
25.5
28.9
34.3
38.9
43.2
47.4
52.0
57.4
60.8
64.9
71.0
18.3
24.4
28.5
31.9
37.3
41.9
46.2
50.4
55.0
60.4
63.8
67.9
74.0
21.3
27.4
31.5
34.9
40.3
44.9
49.2
53.4
58.0
63.4
66.8
70.9
77.0
24.3
30.4
34.5
37.9
43.3
47.9
52.2
56.4
61.0
66.4
69.8
73.9
80.0
27.3
33.4
37.5
40.9
46.3
50.9
55.2
59.4
64.0
69.4
72.8
76.9
83.0
30.3
36.4
40.5
43.9
49.3
53.9
58.2
62.4
67.0
72.4
75.8
79.9
86.0
33.3
39.4
43.5
46.9
52.3
56.9
61.2
65.4
70.0
75.4
78.8
82.9
89.0
36.3
42.4
46.5
49.9
55.3
59.9
64.2
68.4
73.0
78.4
81.8
85.9
92.0
39.3
45.4
49.5
52.9
58.3
62.9
67.2
71.4
76.0
81.4
84.8
88.9
95.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
13.6
19.7
23.7
27.1
32.6
37.2
41.4
45.6
50.2
55.7
59.0
63.1
69.2
16.6
22.7
26.7
30.1
35.6
40.2
44.4
48.6
53.2
58.6
62.0
66.1
72.2
19.6
25.7
29.7
33.1
38.6
43.1
47.4
51.6
56.2
61.6
65.0
69.1
75.2
22.6
28.7
32.7
36.1
41.6
46.1
50.4
54.6
59.2
64.6
68.0
72.1
78.2
25.6
31.7
35.7
39.1
44.6
49.1
53.4
57.6
62.2
67.6
71.0
75.1
81.2
28.6
34.7
38.7
42.1
47.6
52.1
56.4
60.6
65.2
70.6
74.0
78.1
84.2
31.6
37.7
41.7
45.1
50.6
55.1
59.4
63.6
68.2
73.6
77.0
81.1
87.2
34.6
40.7
44.7
48.1
53.6
58.1
62.4
66.6
71.2
76.6
80.0
84.1
90.2
37.5
43.7
47.7
51.1
56.6
61.1
65.4
69.6
74.2
79.6
83.0
87.1
93.2
40.5
46.7
50.7
54.1
59.6
64.1
68.4
72.6
77.2
82.6
86.0
90.1
96.2
43.5
49.7
53.7
57.1
62.6
67.1
71.4
75.6
80.2
85.6
89.0
93.1
99.2
46.5
52.7
56.7
60.1
65.6
70.1
74.4
78.6
83.2
88.6
92.0
96.1
100.0
49.5
55.7
59.7
63.1
68.6
73.1
77.4
81.6
86.2
91.6
95.0
99.1
100.0
Table A12
Normative data for the TMT-A stratified by age for PUERTO RICO
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
–
–
6.2
10.3
17.0
22.7
27.9
33.1
38.7
45.4
49.6
54.6
62.1
–
4.3
9.3
13.5
20.2
25.8
31.1
36.3
41.9
48.6
52.8
57.8
65.3
–
7.5
12.5
16.7
23.4
29.0
34.2
39.4
45.1
51.8
55.9
60.9
68.5
3.2
10.7
15.7
19.9
26.5
32.2
37.4
42.6
48.3
54.9
59.1
64.1
71.6
6.3
13.8
18.9
23.0
29.7
35.3
40.6
45.8
51.4
58.1
62.3
67.3
74.8
9.5
17.0
22.0
26.2
32.9
38.5
43.7
49.0
54.6
61.3
65.5
70.5
78.0
12.7
20.2
25.2
29.4
36.1
41.7
46.9
52.1
57.8
64.4
68.6
73.6
81.2
15.8
23.4
28.4
32.5
39.2
44.9
50.1
55.3
60.9
67.6
71.8
76.8
84.3
19.0
26.5
31.5
35.7
42.4
48.0
53.3
58.5
64.1
70.8
75.0
80.0
87.5
22.2
29.7
34.7
38.9
45.6
51.2
56.4
61.6
67.3
74.0
78.1
83.1
90.7
25.4
32.9
37.9
42.1
48.7
54.4
59.6
64.8
70.5
77.1
81.3
86.3
93.8
28.5
36.0
41.1
45.2
51.9
57.5
62.8
68.0
73.6
80.3
84.5
89.5
97.0
31.7
39.2
44.2
48.4
55.1
60.7
65.9
71.2
76.8
83.5
87.7
92.7
100.0
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
655
Table A13
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for ARGENTINA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
17.6
28.4
38.4
48.4
59.2
72.0
80.0
89.6
104.0
–
–
–
8.8
21.6
32.4
42.4
52.4
63.2
76.0
84.0
93.6
108.0
–
–
4.8
12.8
25.6
36.4
46.4
56.4
67.3
80.1
88.1
97.7
112.1
–
–
8.9
16.9
29.7
40.5
50.5
60.5
71.3
84.1
92.1
101.7
116.1
–
3.3
12.9
20.9
33.7
44.5
54.5
64.5
75.3
88.1
96.1
105.7
120.1
–
7.4
17.0
25.0
37.8
48.6
58.6
68.6
79.4
92.2
100.2
109.8
124.2
–
11.4
21.0
29.0
41.8
52.6
62.6
72.6
83.4
96.2
104.2
113.8
128.2
–
15.4
25.0
33.0
45.8
56.6
66.6
76.6
87.4
100.2
108.2
117.8
132.2
–
19.5
29.1
37.1
49.9
60.7
70.7
80.7
91.5
104.3
112.3
121.9
136.3
9.1
23.5
33.1
41.1
53.9
64.7
74.7
84.7
95.5
108.3
116.3
125.9
140.3
13.1
27.5
37.1
45.1
57.9
68.7
78.7
88.7
99.5
112.3
120.3
129.9
144.4
17.2
31.6
41.2
49.2
62.0
72.8
82.8
92.8
103.6
116.4
124.4
134.0
148.4
21.2
35.6
45.2
53.2
66.0
76.8
86.8
96.8
107.6
120.4
128.4
138.0
152.4
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
16.6
26.2
34.2
47.0
57.8
67.8
77.8
88.6
101.4
109.4
119.0
133.4
–
20.6
30.2
38.2
51.0
61.8
71.8
81.8
92.6
105.4
113.4
123.0
137.4
10.2
24.6
34.2
42.2
55.1
65.9
75.9
85.9
96.7
109.5
117.5
127.1
141.5
14.3
28.7
38.3
46.3
59.1
69.9
79.9
89.9
100.7
113.5
121.5
131.1
145.5
18.3
32.7
42.3
50.3
63.1
73.9
83.9
93.9
104.7
117.5
125.5
135.1
149.5
22.4
36.8
46.4
54.4
67.2
78.0
88.0
98.0
108.8
121.6
129.6
139.2
153.6
26.4
40.8
50.4
58.4
71.2
82.0
92.0
102.0
112.8
125.6
133.6
143.2
157.6
30.4
44.8
54.4
62.4
75.2
86.0
96.0
106.0
116.8
129.6
137.6
147.2
161.6
34.5
48.9
58.5
66.5
79.3
90.1
100.1
110.1
120.9
133.7
141.7
151.3
165.7
38.5
52.9
62.5
70.5
83.3
94.1
104.1
114.1
124.9
137.7
145.7
155.3
169.7
42.5
56.9
66.5
74.5
87.3
98.1
108.1
118.1
129.0
141.8
149.8
159.4
173.8
46.6
61.0
70.6
78.6
91.4
102.2
112.2
122.2
133.0
145.8
153.8
163.4
177.8
50.6
65.0
74.6
82.6
95.4
106.2
116.2
126.2
137.0
149.8
157.8
167.4
181.8
Table A14
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for BOLIVIA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
15.6
34.5
51.9
69.3
88.1
110.4
124.3
141.0
166.1
–
–
–
–
27.9
46.7
64.1
81.5
100.3
122.6
136.6
153.3
178.4
–
–
–
17.8
40.1
58.9
76.4
93.8
112.6
134.9
148.8
165.5
190.6
–
–
16.1
30.1
52.4
71.2
88.6
106.0
124.8
147.1
161.0
177.8
202.8
–
11.7
28.4
42.3
64.6
83.4
100.8
118.2
137.1
159.3
173.3
190.0
215.1
–
23.9
40.6
54.6
76.8
95.7
113.1
130.5
149.3
171.6
185.5
202.2
227.3
11.1
36.1
52.9
66.8
89.1
107.9
125.3
142.7
161.5
183.8
197.8
214.5
239.6
23.3
48.4
65.1
79.0
101.3
120.1
137.6
155.0
173.8
196.1
210.0
226.7
251.8
35.5
60.6
77.3
91.3
113.6
132.4
149.8
167.2
186.0
208.3
222.2
239.0
264.0
47.8
72.9
89.6
103.5
125.8
144.6
162.0
179.4
198.3
220.6
234.5
251.2
276.3
60.0
85.1
101.8
115.8
138.1
156.9
174.3
191.7
210.5
232.8
246.7
263.4
288.5
72.3
97.3
114.1
128.0
150.3
169.1
186.5
203.9
222.7
245.0
259.0
275.7
300.0
84.5
109.6
126.3
140.2
162.5
181.3
198.8
216.2
235.0
257.3
271.2
287.9
300.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
17.4
34.1
48.1
70.4
89.2
106.6
124.0
142.8
165.1
179.0
195.7
220.8
–
29.7
46.4
60.3
82.6
101.4
118.8
136.2
155.0
177.3
191.3
208.0
233.1
16.8
41.9
58.6
72.5
94.8
113.6
131.1
148.5
167.3
189.6
203.5
220.2
245.3
29.1
54.1
70.9
84.8
107.1
125.9
143.3
160.7
179.5
201.8
215.8
232.5
257.5
41.3
66.4
83.1
97.0
119.3
138.1
155.5
173.0
191.8
214.1
228.0
244.7
269.8
53.5
78.6
95.3
109.3
131.6
150.4
167.8
185.2
204.0
226.3
240.2
256.9
282.0
65.8
90.9
107.6
121.5
143.8
162.6
180.0
197.4
216.2
238.5
252.5
269.2
294.3
78.0
103.1
119.8
133.7
156.0
174.8
192.3
209.7
228.5
250.8
264.7
281.4
300.0
90.3
115.3
132.1
146.0
168.3
187.1
204.5
221.9
240.7
263.0
277.0
293.7
300.0
102.5
127.6
144.3
158.2
180.5
199.3
216.7
234.2
253.0
275.3
289.2
300.0
–
114.7
139.8
156.5
170.5
192.8
211.6
229.0
246.4
265.2
287.5
300.0
–
–
127.0
152.1
168.8
182.7
205.0
223.8
241.2
258.6
277.5
299.7
300.0
–
–
139.2
164.3
181.0
195.0
217.2
236.1
253.5
270.9
289.7
300.0
–
–
–
656
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table A15
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for CHILE
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
–
12.6
26.5
40.5
55.5
73.3
84.5
97.9
117.9
–
–
–
–
8.1
23.2
37.1
51.1
66.1
84.0
95.1
108.5
128.6
–
–
–
–
18.8
33.8
47.7
61.7
76.7
94.6
105.7
119.1
139.2
–
–
–
11.5
29.4
44.4
58.4
72.3
87.4
105.2
116.3
129.7
149.8
–
–
11.0
22.2
40.0
55.0
69.0
82.9
98.0
115.8
127.0
140.3
160.4
–
8.2
21.6
32.8
50.6
65.7
79.6
93.5
108.6
126.4
137.6
151.0
171.0
–
18.9
32.2
43.4
61.2
76.3
90.2
104.2
119.2
137.0
148.2
161.6
181.6
9.4
29.5
42.9
54.0
71.8
86.9
100.8
114.8
129.8
147.7
158.8
172.2
192.3
20.0
40.1
53.5
64.6
82.5
97.5
111.5
125.4
140.4
158.3
169.4
182.8
202.9
30.6
50.7
64.1
75.2
93.1
108.1
122.1
136.0
151.1
168.9
180.0
193.4
213.5
41.3
61.3
74.7
85.9
103.7
118.8
132.7
146.6
161.7
179.5
190.7
204.0
224.1
51.9
72.0
85.3
96.5
114.3
129.4
143.3
157.2
172.3
190.1
201.3
214.7
234.7
62.5
82.6
95.9
107.1
124.9
140.0
153.9
167.9
182.9
200.8
211.9
225.3
245.3
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
7.2
20.6
31.7
49.6
64.6
78.6
92.5
107.6
125.4
136.5
149.9
170.0
–
17.8
31.2
42.4
60.2
75.3
89.2
103.1
118.2
136.0
147.2
160.5
180.6
8.4
28.5
41.8
53.0
70.8
85.9
99.8
113.7
128.8
146.6
157.8
171.2
191.2
19.0
39.1
52.4
63.6
81.4
96.5
110.4
124.4
139.4
157.3
168.4
181.8
201.9
29.6
49.7
63.1
74.2
92.1
107.1
121.0
135.0
150.0
167.9
179.0
192.4
212.5
40.2
60.3
73.7
84.8
102.7
117.7
131.7
145.6
160.6
178.5
189.6
203.0
223.1
50.9
70.9
84.3
95.5
113.3
128.3
142.3
156.2
171.3
189.1
200.3
213.6
233.7
61.5
81.5
94.9
106.1
123.9
139.0
152.9
166.8
181.9
199.7
210.9
224.3
244.3
72.1
92.2
105.5
116.7
134.5
149.6
163.5
177.5
192.5
210.3
221.5
234.9
254.9
82.7
102.8
116.2
127.3
145.1
160.2
174.1
188.1
203.1
221.0
232.1
245.5
265.6
93.3
113.4
126.8
137.9
155.8
170.8
184.7
198.7
213.7
231.6
242.7
256.1
276.2
103.9
124.0
137.4
148.5
166.4
181.4
195.4
209.3
224.4
242.2
253.3
266.7
286.8
114.6
134.6
148.0
159.2
177.0
192.0
206.0
219.9
235.0
252.8
264.0
277.3
297.4
Table A16
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for CUBA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
9.3
31.0
49.3
66.3
83.2
101.5
123.2
136.8
153.1
177.5
–
–
–
17.1
38.8
57.1
74.1
91.0
109.3
131.0
144.6
160.9
185.3
–
–
11.4
24.9
46.6
64.9
81.9
98.8
117.1
138.8
152.4
168.7
193.1
–
–
19.2
32.7
54.4
72.7
89.7
106.6
124.9
146.6
160.2
176.5
200.9
–
10.7
27.0
40.5
62.2
80.5
97.5
114.4
132.8
154.4
168.0
184.3
208.7
–
18.5
34.8
48.4
70.0
88.4
105.3
122.3
140.6
162.3
175.8
192.1
216.5
–
26.3
42.6
56.2
77.9
96.2
113.1
130.1
148.4
170.1
183.6
199.9
224.3
9.7
34.1
50.4
64.0
85.7
104.0
120.9
137.9
156.2
177.9
191.4
207.7
232.1
17.5
41.9
58.2
71.8
93.5
111.8
128.7
145.7
164.0
185.7
199.2
215.5
239.9
25.3
49.7
66.0
79.6
101.3
119.6
136.5
153.5
171.8
193.5
207.0
223.3
247.7
33.1
57.5
73.8
87.4
109.1
127.4
144.3
161.3
179.6
201.3
214.8
231.1
255.5
40.9
65.3
81.6
95.2
116.9
135.2
152.1
169.1
187.4
209.1
222.6
238.9
263.3
48.7
73.1
89.4
103.0
124.7
143.0
159.9
176.9
195.2
216.9
230.4
246.7
271.1
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
19.4
35.6
49.2
70.9
89.2
106.2
123.1
141.4
163.1
176.7
192.9
217.3
–
27.2
43.5
57.0
78.7
97.0
114.0
130.9
149.2
170.9
184.5
200.7
225.2
10.6
35.0
51.3
64.8
86.5
104.8
121.8
138.7
157.0
178.7
192.3
208.5
233.0
18.4
42.8
59.1
72.6
94.3
112.6
129.6
146.5
164.8
186.5
200.1
216.4
240.8
26.2
50.6
66.9
80.4
102.1
120.4
137.4
154.3
172.6
194.3
207.9
224.2
248.6
34.0
58.4
74.7
88.2
109.9
128.2
145.2
162.1
180.4
202.1
215.7
232.0
256.4
41.8
66.2
82.5
96.0
117.7
136.0
153.0
169.9
188.2
209.9
223.5
239.8
264.2
49.6
74.0
90.3
103.8
125.5
143.8
160.8
177.7
196.0
217.7
231.3
247.6
272.0
57.4
81.8
98.1
111.6
133.3
151.6
168.6
185.5
203.8
225.5
239.1
255.4
279.8
65.2
89.6
105.9
119.4
141.1
159.4
176.4
193.3
211.7
233.3
246.9
263.2
287.6
73.0
97.4
113.7
127.2
148.9
167.3
184.2
201.2
219.5
241.2
254.7
271.0
295.4
80.8
105.2
121.5
135.1
156.7
175.1
192.0
209.0
227.3
249.0
262.5
278.8
300.0
88.6
113.0
129.3
142.9
164.6
182.9
199.8
216.8
235.1
256.8
270.3
286.6
300.0
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
657
Table A17
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for EL SALVADOR
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
–
12.8
31.9
51.1
71.7
96.2
111.5
129.9
157.4
–
–
–
–
–
21.2
40.4
59.5
80.2
104.6
119.9
138.3
165.8
–
–
–
–
9.0
29.7
48.8
67.9
88.6
113.1
128.4
146.7
174.3
–
–
–
–
17.5
38.1
57.3
76.4
97.0
121.5
136.8
155.2
182.7
–
–
–
–
25.9
46.6
65.7
84.8
105.5
130.0
145.3
163.6
191.2
–
–
–
9.9
34.3
55.0
74.1
93.3
113.9
138.4
153.7
172.1
199.6
–
–
–
18.3
42.8
63.4
82.6
101.7
122.4
146.8
162.1
180.5
208.0
–
–
11.4
26.7
51.2
71.9
91.0
110.1
130.8
155.3
170.6
188.9
216.5
–
–
19.9
35.2
59.7
80.3
99.5
118.6
139.2
163.7
179.0
197.4
224.9
–
10.0
28.3
43.6
68.1
88.8
107.9
127.0
147.7
172.2
187.5
205.8
233.4
–
18.4
36.8
52.1
76.5
97.2
116.3
135.5
156.1
180.6
195.9
214.3
241.8
–
26.8
45.2
60.5
85.0
105.6
124.8
143.9
164.6
189.0
204.3
222.7
250.2
–
35.3
53.6
68.9
93.4
114.1
133.2
152.3
173.0
197.5
212.8
231.1
258.7
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
14.0
41.6
60.0
75.3
99.7
120.4
139.5
158.6
179.3
203.8
219.1
237.4
265.0
22.5
50.0
68.4
83.7
108.2
128.8
148.0
167.1
187.7
212.2
227.5
245.9
273.4
30.9
58.5
76.8
92.1
116.6
137.3
156.4
175.5
196.2
220.7
236.0
254.3
281.9
39.4
66.9
85.3
100.6
125.1
145.7
164.8
184.0
204.6
229.1
244.4
262.8
290.3
47.8
75.3
93.7
109.0
133.5
154.2
173.3
192.4
213.1
237.5
252.8
271.2
298.8
56.2
83.8
102.2
117.5
141.9
162.6
181.7
200.8
221.5
246.0
261.3
279.7
300.0
64.7
92.2
110.6
125.9
150.4
171.0
190.2
209.3
229.9
254.4
269.7
288.1
300.0
73.1
100.7
119.0
134.3
158.8
179.5
198.6
217.7
238.4
262.9
278.2
296.5
300.0
81.6
109.1
127.5
142.8
167.3
187.9
207.0
226.2
246.8
271.3
286.6
300.0
–
90.0
117.5
135.9
151.2
175.7
196.4
215.5
234.6
255.3
279.7
295.0
300.0
–
98.4
126.0
144.4
159.7
184.1
204.8
223.9
243.0
263.7
288.2
300.0
–
–
106.9
134.4
152.8
168.1
192.6
213.2
232.4
251.5
272.1
296.6
300.0
–
–
115.3
142.9
161.2
176.5
201.0
221.7
240.8
259.9
280.6
300.0
–
–
–
Table A18
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for GUATEMALA
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
11.1
32.0
51.3
70.6
91.4
116.1
131.6
150.1
177.9
–
–
–
–
15.6
36.5
55.8
75.1
95.9
120.6
136.1
154.6
182.4
–
–
–
–
20.1
41.0
60.3
79.6
100.4
125.1
140.6
159.1
186.9
–
–
–
–
24.6
45.5
64.8
84.1
104.9
129.6
145.1
163.6
191.4
–
–
–
–
29.1
50.0
69.3
88.6
109.4
134.2
149.6
168.1
195.9
–
–
–
8.9
33.6
54.5
73.8
93.1
113.9
138.7
154.1
172.6
200.4
–
–
–
13.4
38.2
59.0
78.3
97.6
118.5
143.2
158.6
177.1
204.9
–
–
–
18.0
42.7
63.5
82.8
102.1
123.0
147.7
163.1
181.6
209.4
–
–
7.0
22.5
47.2
68.0
87.3
106.6
127.5
152.2
167.6
186.1
213.9
–
–
11.5
27.0
51.7
72.5
91.8
111.1
132.0
156.7
172.1
190.7
218.4
–
–
16.0
31.5
56.2
77.0
96.3
115.6
136.5
161.2
176.6
195.2
223.0
–
–
20.5
36.0
60.7
81.5
100.8
120.1
141.0
165.7
181.1
199.7
227.5
–
6.5
25.0
40.5
65.2
86.0
105.3
124.6
145.5
170.2
185.6
204.2
232.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
11.9
39.7
58.2
73.7
98.4
119.2
138.5
157.9
178.7
203.4
218.9
237.4
265.2
16.4
44.2
62.8
78.2
102.9
123.8
143.1
162.4
183.2
207.9
223.4
241.9
269.7
20.9
48.7
67.3
82.7
107.4
128.3
147.6
166.9
187.7
212.4
227.9
246.4
274.2
25.4
53.2
71.8
87.2
111.9
132.8
152.1
171.4
192.2
216.9
232.4
250.9
278.7
29.9
57.7
76.3
91.7
116.4
137.3
156.6
175.9
196.7
221.4
236.9
255.4
283.2
34.4
62.2
80.8
96.2
120.9
141.8
161.1
180.4
201.2
225.9
241.4
259.9
287.7
39.0
66.8
85.3
100.7
125.4
146.3
165.6
184.9
205.7
230.4
245.9
264.4
292.2
43.5
71.3
89.8
105.2
129.9
150.8
170.1
189.4
210.2
234.9
250.4
268.9
296.7
48.0
75.8
94.3
109.7
134.4
155.3
174.6
193.9
214.7
239.4
254.9
273.4
300.0
52.5
80.3
98.8
114.2
138.9
159.8
179.1
198.4
219.2
244.0
259.4
277.9
300.0
57.0
84.8
103.3
118.7
143.5
164.3
183.6
202.9
223.8
248.5
263.9
282.4
300.0
61.5
89.3
107.8
123.2
148.0
168.8
188.1
207.4
228.3
253.0
268.4
286.9
300.0
66.0
93.8
112.3
127.8
152.5
173.3
192.6
211.9
232.8
257.5
272.9
291.4
300.0
658
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table A19
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for HONDURAS
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
15.4
35.7
52.8
68.6
84.4
101.6
121.8
134.5
149.7
172.5
–
–
13.6
26.2
46.5
63.6
79.5
95.3
112.4
132.7
145.4
160.6
183.4
–
9.2
24.4
37.1
57.4
74.5
90.3
106.2
123.3
143.6
156.2
171.4
194.3
–
20.1
35.3
48.0
68.2
85.4
101.2
117.0
134.2
154.4
167.1
182.3
205.1
8.1
31.0
46.2
58.8
79.1
96.2
112.1
127.9
145.0
165.3
178.0
193.2
216.0
19.0
41.8
57.0
69.7
90.0
107.1
122.9
138.8
155.9
176.2
188.8
204.0
226.9
29.9
52.7
67.9
80.6
100.8
118.0
133.8
149.6
166.7
187.0
199.7
214.9
237.7
40.7
63.6
78.8
91.4
111.7
128.8
144.7
160.5
177.6
197.9
210.6
225.8
248.6
51.6
74.4
89.6
102.3
122.6
139.7
155.5
171.4
188.5
208.8
221.4
236.6
259.5
62.5
85.3
100.5
113.2
133.4
150.6
166.4
182.2
199.3
219.6
232.3
247.5
270.3
73.3
96.1
111.4
124.0
144.3
161.4
177.3
193.1
210.2
230.5
243.2
258.4
281.2
84.2
107.0
122.2
134.9
155.2
172.3
188.1
204.0
221.1
241.4
254.0
269.2
292.0
95.1
117.9
133.1
145.8
166.0
183.1
199.0
214.8
231.9
252.2
264.9
280.1
300.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
55.8
78.6
93.8
106.5
126.7
143.8
159.7
175.5
192.6
212.9
225.6
240.8
263.6
66.6
89.4
104.6
117.3
137.6
154.7
170.6
186.4
203.5
223.8
236.5
251.7
274.5
77.5
100.3
115.5
128.2
148.5
165.6
181.4
197.3
214.4
234.6
247.3
262.5
285.3
88.4
111.2
126.4
139.1
159.3
176.4
192.3
208.1
225.2
245.5
258.2
273.4
296.2
99.2
122.0
137.2
149.9
170.2
187.3
203.1
219.0
236.1
256.4
269.0
284.3
300.0
110.1
132.9
148.1
160.8
181.1
198.2
214.0
229.9
247.0
267.2
279.9
295.1
300.0
121.0
143.8
159.0
171.6
191.9
209.0
224.9
240.7
257.8
278.1
290.8
300.0
–
131.8
154.6
169.8
182.5
202.8
219.9
235.7
251.6
268.7
289.0
300.0
–
–
142.7
165.5
180.7
193.4
213.7
230.8
246.6
262.5
279.6
299.8
300.0
–
–
153.6
176.4
191.6
204.2
224.5
241.6
257.5
273.3
290.4
300.0
–
–
–
164.4
187.2
202.4
215.1
235.4
252.5
268.3
284.2
300.0
–
–
–
–
175.3
198.1
213.3
226.0
246.3
263.4
279.2
295.0
300.0
–
–
–
–
186.1
209.0
224.2
236.8
257.1
274.2
290.1
300.0
–
–
–
–
–
Table A20
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for MEXICO
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
9.4
26.5
42.4
58.2
75.4
95.6
108.3
123.5
146.3
–
–
–
–
18.1
35.2
51.0
66.9
84.0
104.3
117.0
132.2
155.0
–
–
–
6.4
26.7
43.8
59.7
75.5
92.7
112.9
125.6
140.8
163.6
–
–
–
15.1
35.4
52.5
68.3
84.2
101.3
121.6
134.3
149.5
172.3
–
–
11.1
23.7
44.0
61.1
77.0
92.8
109.9
130.2
142.9
158.1
180.9
–
–
19.7
32.4
52.7
69.8
85.6
101.5
118.6
138.9
151.6
166.8
189.6
–
13.2
28.4
41.0
61.3
78.4
94.3
110.1
127.2
147.5
160.2
175.4
198.2
–
21.8
37.0
49.7
70.0
87.1
102.9
118.8
135.9
156.2
168.9
184.1
206.9
7.6
30.4
45.7
58.3
78.6
95.7
111.6
127.4
144.5
164.8
177.5
192.7
215.5
16.3
39.1
54.3
67.0
87.3
104.4
120.2
136.1
153.2
173.5
186.2
201.4
224.2
24.9
47.7
63.0
75.6
95.9
113.0
128.9
144.7
161.8
182.1
194.8
210.0
232.8
33.6
56.4
71.6
84.3
104.6
121.7
137.5
153.4
170.5
190.8
203.5
218.7
241.5
42.2
65.0
80.3
92.9
113.2
130.3
146.2
162.0
179.1
199.4
212.1
227.3
250.1
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
8.5
21.2
41.5
58.6
74.5
90.3
107.4
127.7
140.4
155.6
178.4
–
–
17.2
29.9
50.1
67.3
83.1
98.9
116.1
136.3
149.0
164.2
187.1
–
10.6
25.8
38.5
58.8
75.9
91.8
107.6
124.7
145.0
157.7
172.9
195.7
–
19.3
34.5
47.2
67.4
84.6
100.4
116.2
133.4
153.6
166.3
181.5
204.4
–
27.9
43.1
55.8
76.1
93.2
109.0
124.9
142.0
162.3
175.0
190.2
213.0
13.7
36.6
51.8
64.5
84.7
101.9
117.7
133.5
150.7
170.9
183.6
198.8
221.7
22.4
45.2
60.4
73.1
93.4
110.5
126.3
142.2
159.3
179.6
192.3
207.5
230.3
31.0
53.9
69.1
81.8
102.0
119.1
135.0
150.8
168.0
188.2
200.9
216.1
239.0
39.7
62.5
77.7
90.4
110.7
127.8
143.6
159.5
176.6
196.9
209.6
224.8
247.6
48.3
71.2
86.4
99.0
119.3
136.4
152.3
168.1
185.3
205.5
218.2
233.4
256.2
57.0
79.8
95.0
107.7
128.0
145.1
160.9
176.8
193.9
214.2
226.9
242.1
264.9
65.6
88.5
103.7
116.3
136.6
153.7
169.6
185.4
202.6
222.8
235.5
250.7
273.5
74.3
97.1
112.3
125.0
145.3
162.4
178.2
194.1
211.2
231.5
244.2
259.4
282.2
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
659
Table A21
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for PARAGUAY
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
10.3
25.8
38.9
51.0
63.2
76.3
91.8
101.5
113.1
130.6
–
–
7.9
17.6
33.1
46.2
58.4
70.5
83.6
99.1
108.8
120.5
137.9
–
–
15.2
24.9
40.4
53.5
65.7
77.8
90.9
106.4
116.1
127.8
145.2
–
10.9
22.5
32.2
47.8
60.9
73.0
85.1
98.2
113.7
123.4
135.1
152.6
–
18.2
29.9
39.6
55.1
68.2
80.3
92.4
105.5
121.1
130.8
142.4
159.9
8.1
25.5
37.2
46.9
62.4
75.5
87.6
99.8
112.9
128.4
138.1
149.7
167.2
15.4
32.8
44.5
54.2
69.7
82.8
94.9
107.1
120.2
135.7
145.4
157.0
174.5
22.7
40.2
51.8
61.5
77.0
90.1
102.3
114.4
127.5
143.0
152.7
164.4
181.8
30.0
47.5
59.1
68.8
84.4
97.5
109.6
121.7
134.8
150.3
160.0
171.7
189.1
37.3
54.8
66.4
76.1
91.7
104.8
116.9
129.0
142.1
157.7
167.4
179.0
196.5
44.7
62.1
73.8
83.5
99.0
112.1
124.2
136.3
149.4
165.0
174.7
186.3
203.8
52.0
69.4
81.1
90.8
106.3
119.4
131.5
143.7
156.8
172.3
182.0
193.6
211.1
59.3
76.8
88.4
98.1
113.6
126.7
138.9
151.0
164.1
179.6
189.3
201.0
218.4
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
12.5
30.0
41.6
51.3
66.9
80.0
92.1
104.2
117.3
132.8
142.5
154.2
171.6
19.8
37.3
48.9
58.6
74.2
87.3
99.4
111.5
124.6
140.2
149.9
161.5
179.0
27.2
44.6
56.3
66.0
81.5
94.6
106.7
118.8
131.9
147.5
157.2
168.8
186.3
34.5
51.9
63.6
73.3
88.8
101.9
114.0
126.2
139.3
154.8
164.5
176.1
193.6
41.8
59.3
70.9
80.6
96.1
109.2
121.4
133.5
146.6
162.1
171.8
183.5
200.9
49.1
66.6
78.2
87.9
103.4
116.5
128.7
140.8
153.9
169.4
179.1
190.8
208.2
56.4
73.9
85.5
95.2
110.8
123.9
136.0
148.1
161.2
176.7
186.5
198.1
215.6
63.7
81.2
92.9
102.6
118.1
131.2
143.3
155.4
168.5
184.1
193.8
205.4
222.9
71.1
88.5
100.2
109.9
125.4
138.5
150.6
162.8
175.9
191.4
201.1
212.7
230.2
78.4
95.8
107.5
117.2
132.7
145.8
157.9
170.1
183.2
198.7
208.4
220.0
237.5
85.7
103.2
114.8
124.5
140.0
153.1
165.3
177.4
190.5
206.0
215.7
227.4
244.8
93.0
110.5
122.1
131.8
147.4
160.5
172.6
184.7
197.8
213.3
223.0
234.7
252.2
100.3
117.8
129.4
139.2
154.7
167.8
179.9
192.0
205.1
220.7
230.4
242.0
259.5
Table A22
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for PERU
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
5.5
23.9
39.4
53.7
68.1
83.6
101.9
113.4
127.2
147.8
–
–
–
14.3
32.7
48.2
62.6
76.9
92.4
110.8
122.2
136.0
156.7
–
–
11.7
23.2
41.6
57.1
71.4
85.7
101.2
119.6
131.1
144.9
165.5
–
–
20.6
32.0
50.4
65.9
80.2
94.6
110.1
128.5
139.9
153.7
174.4
–
15.6
29.4
40.9
59.2
74.7
89.1
103.4
118.9
137.3
148.8
162.5
183.2
–
24.5
38.2
49.7
68.1
83.6
97.9
112.3
127.8
146.1
157.6
171.4
192.1
12.7
33.3
47.1
58.6
76.9
92.4
106.8
121.1
136.6
155.0
166.5
180.2
200.9
21.5
42.2
55.9
67.4
85.8
101.3
115.6
130.0
145.5
163.8
175.3
189.1
209.7
30.3
51.0
64.8
76.3
94.6
110.1
124.5
138.8
154.3
172.7
184.2
197.9
218.6
39.2
59.9
73.6
85.1
103.5
119.0
133.3
147.7
163.2
181.5
193.0
206.8
227.4
48.0
68.7
82.5
93.9
112.3
127.8
142.2
156.5
172.0
190.4
201.8
215.6
236.3
56.9
77.5
91.3
102.8
121.2
136.7
151.0
165.3
180.8
199.2
210.7
224.5
245.1
65.7
86.4
100.2
111.6
130.0
145.5
159.8
174.2
189.7
208.0
219.5
233.3
254.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
48–52 53–57
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
22.8
36.6
48.1
66.5
82.0
96.3
110.7
126.1
144.5
156.0
169.8
190.4
11.0
31.7
45.5
56.9
75.3
90.8
105.1
119.5
135.0
153.4
164.8
178.6
199.3
19.9
40.5
54.3
65.8
84.1
99.6
114.0
128.3
143.8
162.2
173.7
187.5
208.1
28.7
49.4
63.2
74.6
93.0
108.5
122.8
137.2
152.7
171.0
182.5
196.3
217.0
37.6
58.2
72.0
83.5
101.8
117.3
131.7
146.0
161.5
179.9
191.4
205.1
225.8
46.4
67.1
80.8
92.3
110.7
126.2
140.5
154.9
170.4
188.7
200.2
214.0
234.6
55.2
75.9
89.7
101.2
119.5
135.0
149.4
163.7
179.2
197.6
209.1
222.8
243.5
64.1
84.8
98.5
110.0
128.4
143.9
158.2
172.6
188.1
206.4
217.9
231.7
252.3
72.9
93.6
107.4
118.8
137.2
152.7
167.1
181.4
196.9
215.3
226.7
240.5
261.2
81.8
102.4
116.2
127.7
146.1
161.6
175.9
190.2
205.7
224.1
235.6
249.4
270.0
90.6
111.3
125.1
136.5
154.9
170.4
184.7
199.1
214.6
233.0
244.4
258.2
278.9
99.5
120.1
133.9
145.4
163.7
179.2
193.6
207.9
223.4
241.8
253.3
267.0
287.7
108.3
129.0
142.7
154.2
172.6
188.1
202.4
216.8
232.3
250.6
262.1
275.9
296.6
660
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
Table A23
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for PUERTO RICO
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
11.1
27.4
42.5
57.7
74.0
93.4
105.5
120.0
141.8
–
–
–
–
21.7
38.0
53.2
68.3
84.6
104.0
116.1
130.6
152.4
–
–
–
12.9
32.3
48.6
63.8
78.9
95.2
114.6
126.7
141.2
163.0
–
–
11.4
23.5
42.9
59.2
74.4
89.5
105.8
125.2
137.3
151.8
173.6
–
7.5
22.1
34.2
53.5
69.9
85.0
100.1
116.4
135.8
147.9
162.4
184.2
–
18.1
32.7
44.8
64.1
80.5
95.6
110.7
127.0
146.4
158.5
173.0
194.8
–
28.7
43.3
55.4
74.7
91.1
106.2
121.3
137.7
157.0
169.1
183.6
205.4
17.6
39.4
53.9
66.0
85.3
101.7
116.8
131.9
148.3
167.6
179.7
194.2
216.0
28.2
50.0
64.5
76.6
95.9
112.3
127.4
142.5
158.9
178.2
190.3
204.9
226.6
38.8
60.6
75.1
87.2
106.6
122.9
138.0
153.1
169.5
188.8
200.9
215.5
237.2
49.4
71.2
85.7
97.8
117.2
133.5
148.6
163.8
180.1
199.4
211.6
226.1
247.9
60.0
81.8
96.3
108.4
127.8
144.1
159.2
174.4
190.7
210.1
222.2
236.7
258.5
70.6
92.4
106.9
119.0
138.4
154.7
169.8
185.0
201.3
220.7
232.8
247.3
269.1
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
7.8
27.2
43.5
58.7
73.8
90.1
109.5
121.6
136.1
157.9
–
–
–
18.4
37.8
54.1
69.3
84.4
100.7
120.1
132.2
146.7
168.5
–
–
17.0
29.1
48.4
64.8
79.9
95.0
111.3
130.7
142.8
157.3
179.1
–
13.0
27.6
39.7
59.0
75.4
90.5
105.6
122.0
141.3
153.4
167.9
189.7
–
23.6
38.2
50.3
69.6
86.0
101.1
116.2
132.6
151.9
164.0
178.5
200.3
12.5
34.3
48.8
60.9
80.2
96.6
111.7
126.8
143.2
162.5
174.6
189.2
210.9
23.1
44.9
59.4
71.5
90.8
107.2
122.3
137.4
153.8
173.1
185.2
199.8
221.5
33.7
55.5
70.0
82.1
101.5
117.8
132.9
148.0
164.4
183.7
195.8
210.4
232.1
44.3
66.1
80.6
92.7
112.1
128.4
143.5
158.7
175.0
194.4
206.5
221.0
242.8
54.9
76.7
91.2
103.3
122.7
139.0
154.1
169.3
185.6
205.0
217.1
231.6
253.4
65.5
87.3
101.8
113.9
133.3
149.6
164.7
179.9
196.2
215.6
227.7
242.2
264.0
76.1
97.9
112.4
124.5
143.9
160.2
175.3
190.5
206.8
226.2
238.3
252.8
274.6
86.7
108.5
123.0
135.1
154.5
170.8
186.0
201.1
217.4
236.8
248.9
263.4
285.2
Table 24
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for PERU
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
5.5
23.9
39.4
53.7
68.1
83.6
101.9
113.4
127.2
147.8
–
–
–
14.3
32.7
48.2
62.6
76.9
92.4
110.8
122.2
136.0
156.7
–
–
11.7
23.2
41.6
57.1
71.4
85.7
101.2
119.6
131.1
144.9
165.5
–
–
20.6
32.0
50.4
65.9
80.2
94.6
110.1
128.5
139.9
153.7
174.4
–
15.6
29.4
40.9
59.2
74.7
89.1
103.4
118.9
137.3
148.8
162.5
183.2
–
24.5
38.2
49.7
68.1
83.6
97.9
112.3
127.8
146.1
157.6
171.4
192.1
12.7
33.3
47.1
58.6
76.9
92.4
106.8
121.1
136.6
155.0
166.5
180.2
200.9
21.5
42.2
55.9
67.4
85.8
101.3
115.6
130.0
145.5
163.8
175.3
189.1
209.7
30.3
51.0
64.8
76.3
94.6
110.1
124.5
138.8
154.3
172.7
184.2
197.9
218.6
39.2
59.9
73.6
85.1
103.5
119.0
133.3
147.7
163.2
181.5
193.0
206.8
227.4
48.0
68.7
82.5
93.9
112.3
127.8
142.2
156.5
172.0
190.4
201.8
215.6
236.3
56.9
77.5
91.3
102.8
121.2
136.7
151.0
165.3
180.8
199.2
210.7
224.5
245.1
65.7
86.4
100.2
111.6
130.0
145.5
159.8
174.2
189.7
208.0
219.5
233.3
254.0
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
22.8
36.6
48.1
66.5
82.0
96.3
110.7
126.1
144.5
156.0
169.8
190.4
11.0
31.7
45.5
56.9
75.3
90.8
105.1
119.5
135.0
153.4
164.8
178.6
199.3
19.9
40.5
54.3
65.8
84.1
99.6
114.0
128.3
143.8
162.2
173.7
187.5
208.1
28.7
49.4
63.2
74.6
93.0
108.5
122.8
137.2
152.7
171.0
182.5
196.3
217.0
37.6
58.2
72.0
83.5
101.8
117.3
131.7
146.0
161.5
179.9
191.4
205.1
225.8
46.4
67.1
80.8
92.3
110.7
126.2
140.5
154.9
170.4
188.7
200.2
214.0
234.6
55.2
75.9
89.7
101.2
119.5
135.0
149.4
163.7
179.2
197.6
209.1
222.8
243.5
64.1
84.8
98.5
110.0
128.4
143.9
158.2
172.6
188.1
206.4
217.9
231.7
252.3
72.9
93.6
107.4
118.8
137.2
152.7
167.1
181.4
196.9
215.3
226.7
240.5
261.2
81.8
102.4
116.2
127.7
146.1
161.6
175.9
190.2
205.7
224.1
235.6
249.4
270.0
90.6
111.3
125.1
136.5
154.9
170.4
184.7
199.1
214.6
233.0
244.4
258.2
278.9
99.5
120.1
133.9
145.4
163.7
179.2
193.6
207.9
223.4
241.8
253.3
267.0
287.7
108.3
129.0
142.7
154.2
172.6
188.1
202.4
216.8
232.3
250.6
262.1
275.9
296.6
J.C. Arango-Lasprilla et al. / TMT: Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population
661
Table 25
Normative data for the TMT-B stratified by age and education levels for PUERTO RICO
View publication stats
18–22
23–27
28–32
33–37
38–42
43–47
48–52
53–57
58–62
63–67
68–72
73–77
>77
>12 years of education
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
–
11.1
27.4
42.5
57.7
74.0
93.4
105.5
120.0
141.8
–
–
–
–
21.7
38.0
53.2
68.3
84.6
104.0
116.1
130.6
152.4
–
–
–
12.9
32.3
48.6
63.8
78.9
95.2
114.6
126.7
141.2
163.0
–
–
11.4
23.5
42.9
59.2
74.4
89.5
105.8
125.2
137.3
151.8
173.6
–
7.5
22.1
34.2
53.5
69.9
85.0
100.1
116.4
135.8
147.9
162.4
184.2
–
18.1
32.7
44.8
64.1
80.5
95.6
110.7
127.0
146.4
158.5
173.0
194.8
–
28.7
43.3
55.4
74.7
91.1
106.2
121.3
137.7
157.0
169.1
183.6
205.4
17.6
39.4
53.9
66.0
85.3
101.7
116.8
131.9
148.3
167.6
179.7
194.2
216.0
28.2
50.0
64.5
76.6
95.9
112.3
127.4
142.5
158.9
178.2
190.3
204.9
226.6
38.8
60.6
75.1
87.2
106.6
122.9
138.0
153.1
169.5
188.8
200.9
215.5
237.2
49.4
71.2
85.7
97.8
117.2
133.5
148.6
163.8
180.1
199.4
211.6
226.1
247.9
60.0
81.8
96.3
108.4
127.8
144.1
159.2
174.4
190.7
210.1
222.2
236.7
258.5
70.6
92.4
106.9
119.0
138.4
154.7
169.8
185.0
201.3
220.7
232.8
247.3
269.1
1 to 12 years of education
Age (Years)
Percentile
95
90
85
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
15
10
5
–
–
–
7.8
27.2
43.5
58.7
73.8
90.1
109.5
121.6
136.1
157.9
–
–
–
18.4
37.8
54.1
69.3
84.4
100.7
120.1
132.2
146.7
168.5
–
–
17.0
29.1
48.4
64.8
79.9
95.0
111.3
130.7
142.8
157.3
179.1
–
13.0
27.6
39.7
59.0
75.4
90.5
105.6
122.0
141.3
153.4
167.9
189.7
–
23.6
38.2
50.3
69.6
86.0
101.1
116.2
132.6
151.9
164.0
178.5
200.3
12.5
34.3
48.8
60.9
80.2
96.6
111.7
126.8
143.2
162.5
174.6
189.2
210.9
23.1
44.9
59.4
71.5
90.8
107.2
122.3
137.4
153.8
173.1
185.2
199.8
221.5
33.7
55.5
70.0
82.1
101.5
117.8
132.9
148.0
164.4
183.7
195.8
210.4
232.1
44.3
66.1
80.6
92.7
112.1
128.4
143.5
158.7
175.0
194.4
206.5
221.0
242.8
54.9
76.7
91.2
103.3
122.7
139.0
154.1
169.3
185.6
205.0
217.1
231.6
253.4
65.5
87.3
101.8
113.9
133.3
149.6
164.7
179.9
196.2
215.6
227.7
242.2
264.0
76.1
97.9
112.4
124.5
143.9
160.2
175.3
190.5
206.8
226.2
238.3
252.8
274.6
86.7
108.5
123.0
135.1
154.5
170.8
186.0
201.1
217.4
236.8
248.9
263.4
285.2