Subido por Francisco Javier Remon

Food Law in Lebanon Overview and Analysi

Anuncio
ACADEMIA Letters
Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis
Maria El Gemayel, Al Jad
Abstract
It is argued that ‘[ Lebanon does not] need new laws and regulations concerning food safety
as [it needs] better trained people to implement them.’ The statement is scrutinised in this
article, which takes a closer look at the provisions of the Lebanese Food Safety Law 2015
in an attempt to determine how it can contribute to a better implementation of legislative
instruments.
I. Introduction
In November 2015, the Lebanese Parliament passed the Food Safety Law (FSL).[1] The FSL
was long overdue, representing a definite step up from the dispersed bits and pieces the
Lebanese food sector was governed by, which were no longer compatible with modern commercial and technological developments. Before then, food safety legislative instruments were
gradually, if not erratically, passed as part of wider frameworks addressing other issues.[2]
As a result, many governmental agencies across different ministries were dealing with food
safety issues.[3] These agencies’ authority was somewhat lost between their limited administrative and technical resources, and lack of coordination between each other,[4] resulting
in a loose regulation.[5] The FSL principally promotes the establishment of the Food Safety
Lebanese Commission (FSLC),[6] whose primary role is to draft legislative instruments for
the implementation of FSL provisions.[7] The law does however come with its challenges,
the main one relating to the complexity of its implementation.
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
1
II. The 2015 Food Safety Law
The long awaited FSL came as a solution to a chaotic arrangement that could not keep up with
modern developments in the food industry. The FSL encompasses in its framework several
ministries, the main ones being the Ministries of Public Health, Agriculture, and Economy and
Trade. It mentions that the inclusion of these ministries is essential since all three are already
involved in the provision of safe food through previous legislation that is still in force and
complementary to the FSL.[8] The difficulties arising from such an entanglement cannot be
ignored, mainly because of its resulting complicated enforceability. This fact puts a question
mark as to the implementation of these (sometimes outdated) instruments. It also questions not
only the efficiency, but also the feasibility of monitoring food businesses when the regulations
governing them are entangled as such.
It is argued that ‘[Lebanon does not] need new laws and regulations concerning food safety
as [it needs] better trained people to implement them.’[9] In this context, a closer look is cast
on the provisions of the FSL, in an attempt to determine how it can contribute to a better
implementation of these legislative instruments. Food law in the European Union (EU) is
chosen as a reference point, at the core of which is the General Food Law (GFL).[10]
1. Main Elements of the FSL
a. Scope of application and definitions
The FSL includes in its provisions the main elements that are found in modern food law.
The FSL starts by delimiting the scope of its application, which spans the totality of the food
industry by adopting the farm to fork structure.[11]
The FSL focuses on defining safe[12] and unsafe[13] food,mainly considering the effects
on public health in its definition. It considers food as safe if it meets national standards, and in
the absence of those, international standards which are adopted and recognized in Lebanon,
i.e. Codex Alimentarius.[14]
According to the FSL, an FBO’s obligations related to food safety are to take the necessary
precautions to prevent food contamination during its import, manufacture, transformation,
etc.[15] These precautions are however not determined. It is unusual for legislative instruments to determine such safety standards in detail, e.g. the flow of operations in a kitchen to
avoid cross contamination between raw meats and vegetables. Although HACCP principles
are found in the FSL, their implementation is however not legally binding as the FSL rather
suggests the application of the concept but not specific principles. Third party companies are
thus called upon by food business operations for training, certifying, and auditing the application of HACCP. This however remains a voluntary procedure. Many more principles of
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
2
modern food law which are found in the FSL are mainly delegated to the FSLC which will
be responsible for implementing them. In this regard, the FSLC’s establishment status and
expected activities are considered.
2. Food Safety Lebanese Commission
The FSLC is a financially and administratively independent governmental organisation, over
which the Prime Minister exercises guardianship authority.[16] It holds many responsibilities; these include but are not limited to approving or drafting by-laws that implement FSL
provisions,[17] implementing a monitoring system to enforce regulations,[18] coordinating
between relevant ministries for implementation of FSL provisions,[19] preparing technical
rules and specifications relevant to the food industry,[20] assessing safety risks and setting
standards accordingly,[21] preparing studies, research and statistics related to food safety,[22]
establishing a rapid alert system,[23] monitoring and tracking each step from farm to fork,
to control violations of FSL provisions,[24] sample analysis,[25] follow up inspections,[26]
receiving complaints from consumers,[27] establishing and managing a network between various Lebanese Governorates,[28] and educational and awareness campaigns.[29]
Needless to say, the SFLC has many hats to wear. Although it has been described as
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Lebanon,[30] or the equivalent European Food
Safety Authority (EFSA), the all-inclusive package of responsibilities that were assigned to
the FSLC go far beyond that, when there is no structure that supports the implementation of
these tasks. Even if as stated above, Lebanon is presumably not in need of new food laws,
what it also is not in need of, is to throw more complication into its food safety structure, if
there were one to begin with. The idea is not to have legislative instruments scattered among
several ministries and one single governmental organisation running the show, but rather to
gather all the legislative instruments under a unified structure, and have smaller, efficient organisations focusing on specific tasks. What does not help is that years after the FSL was
enacted, the SFLC has still not been established, and the current structure has not changed, as
many decisions related to the food industry were issued after the FSL was approved; these are
also issued by several different ministries, further questioning the FSL’s ability to provide the
much needed legislative unification that it promises, when no change in the chaotic structure
is observed.
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
3
III. Our Analysis: How Can Food Law Be Accessible for a Better
Implementation?
Although widely acclaimed, and the main argument for the need of a food safety law being a
non-system of scattered instruments, the fact remains that without the FSLC, the FSL is not
very efficient, especially when new laws and decisions are still issued as before across different
ministries. Determining whether the FSL is successful in its mission is thus still impossible
at this point since it has so far failed in its main objective. Even at this preliminary stage, and
before being established, the long list of responsibilities assigned to the FSLC casts a shadow
of doubt as to whether it will be successful in fulfilling its role.
Before the comprehensive approach to EU food law became what it is today, it was more
of a cluster of endless provisions than a structured and efficient system.[31] This image is not
unlike what it is today in Lebanon. Although built at an academic level, the EU approach
to a complicated and complex food law tackled all instruments in alphabetic order, and was
surprisingly met with great success.[32] Legislative instruments were reportedly organised
based on ‘what, who and how’ questions relating to how each provision deals with issues
related to the food sector.[33] The most singular aspect of this structure is that it creates a
framework in which researchers, students and practitioners can understand both the provisions
at a small scale and the functioning of the law in general.[34] On the one hand, such deep
understanding of the system provides professionals with the right tools to research it, and
as a result contribute to future reforms and improvements. On the other hand, professionals
(lawyers and researchers) are also able to appropriately understand the functioning of the
system and the law itself, with proper application in legal practice.
Lebanese law, structured as it is today, is inaccessible to many professionals who do not get
their information straight from the source, i.e. the many involved ministries. Asking questions
like ‘what, who and how?’ are not often met with clear and concise answers. The law does
not only have to be well structured for authorities to implement it; it also has to be accessible
and understandable by researchers and practitioners. As a result, the scope of reforms that the
FSL has to bring about suddenly appears much broader than originally thought.
While awaiting FSL-related developments to concretise, the Lebanese consumer currently
relies on protective agencies which ensure that basic consumer rights are met.
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
4
IV. Protective Organisations
1. Directorate of Consumer Protection
The Directorate of Consumer Protection is the governmental body that addresses consumers’
complaints in case of fraud, food poisoning, or other transgressions. It is affiliated with the
Ministry of Economy & Trade.[35] The Directorate acts in the framework of governmental
regulation and interventions, meaning that the actions it takes are legally-binding.
The Directorate does not only provide consumer protections, but it also focuses on prevention through awareness campaigns regarding food safety. This includes but is not limited
to publicised advice about handling food at home, storing food, and shopping advice (e.g.
not buying cans which are damaged or rusty, choosing foods in the right order with nonrefrigerated items first and fresh perishables last, not mixing meat, dairy, and vegetables in
the cart to avoid cross-contamination),[36] etc…Although commendable, one downside of
the Directorate’s work is that it does not focus on food safety, but rather encompasses in its
list of responsibilities all consumer goods.[37]
2. Consumer Lebanon Organisation
Consumers Lebanon is a non-governmental organisation has for main objective the assessment
of basic rights related to food safety, and their impact on the local population. The organisation
heavily underlines in its communications the deep corruption, which the country continually
finds itself a victim of, and which seems to be the greatest barrier to the development of a basic
and much needed food law. Although this political bracket falls outside the scope of this paper,
it would appear that there is no way around it when it constitutes the biggest impediment to
the development of a legislative food law framework. The organisation indeed states that ‘to
date, there are 34 indispensable laws that have not been issued regulatory decrees and have
been pending for over 10 years. One of which is the Consumer Protection Law. Even the Food
Safety Law is still pending in the Chamber of Deputies; as well as the Competition Law.’[38]
Consumers Lebanon’s work is certainly admirable and much needed. It however is important to point out that like the Directorate of Consumer Protection, its scope of work includes
all types of consumers, and not just the food consumer. For this reason, and while the organisation relentlessly encourages consumers to reach out for complaints, the fact that these
activities are simply not enough cannot be overlooked, if there is no strong legal backbone to
support them.
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
5
3. Voluntary Control and Third Party Auditing
The implementation of hygiene and safety practices are required by the FSL.[39] While practices aim to cover the totality of the food chain, there however is a segregation between the
different stages, and what practices need to be applied at what stage. For example, the farmer’s
practices are separated from the rest of the food chain, and use of pesticides is even included
in relevant provisions[40] when it is not relevant to the FSL’s purpose, and should rather be
left to another legal instrument which treats on the subject. The FSL aims to be holistic by
following the ‘Farm to Fork’ approach, but its provisions are too general, which might cause
confusion at the application level. Although the FSL covers the HACCP principles in the recommended steps, as well as the role it assigns to the FSLC, these are not listed as mandatory.
For this reason, HACCP certification and application remains voluntary. Although most big
restaurants are willingly getting a HACCP accreditation and following the procedures, this
remains a self-promoted effort that they market in order to gain the consumer’s trust. Third
party companies, which are required by the FSL to be themselves certified,[41] are responsible
for the training, accreditation, and auditing.
V. Conclusion
The original earnestness accompanying the enactment of the FSA has long faded, as some
consider that the structure is solid, and what only needs to be done is implement it, and others
which are in charge of implementation are simply not delivering. The only hope, although
meagre, is that the Consumer Protection Association understands the futility of the FSL when
standing by itself, without complementary instruments further developed to carry its mission. ‘The commission will have to develop standards virtually from scratch, […] meaning
it could take years before the full gamut of precautions and regulatory measures reach the
consumer.’[42]
After the devastating Beirut Port explosion of August 4, 2020, coupled with the effects of
the COVID-19 pandemic on a country that was already torn down by severe economic and
political crises, Lebanon finds its food-related issues relegated to the backseat. The country is therefore as far as ever from the legislative reform it desperately needs. As a result,
since national standards are either absent or vague in many features relating to food products, perhaps the most important provision of the FSL is that in the absence of national standards, international standards are to be adopted and recognised in Lebanon, namely Codex
Alimentarius.[43] The fact remains that Codex recommendations are not legally binding for
international agreements that rely on them[44] (e.g. WTO’s SPS Agreement).[45] They still
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
6
are, however, often used in the development of national legislation,[46] and would certainly
provide valuable input to the development of a more adequate Lebanese food law.
VI. References
[1] Food Safety Law (FSL), Law No. 35-2015, OG No. 48, pp. 3191/11 et sqq. [2] Adel Cortas, ‘The Food Safety Law in Lebanon: What Is Next?,’ Advanced Techniques in Clinical Microbiology, August 2017, vol 1, no 3, p. 15, https://rb.gy/ctz4ja, last accessed 5 March 2021.
[3] An example is The Ministry of Industry’s LIBNOR (Lebanese Norms Organization),
which had difficulties covering the agricultural sector mainly due to agricultural companies
being based in remote rural areas that were unreachable by the limited resources. The Ministry
of the Environment was also involved; however food safety issues are rather unrelatable in this
context. [4] FSL, preamble. [5] ibid (n 2). [6] Article 22 FSL. [7] Article 29(1) FSL. [8] FSL,
preamble. [9] ibid (n 2). [10] Regulation (EC) 178/2002 of the of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements
of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in
matters of food safety, OJ L 31/1 – General Food Law (GFL). [11] Preamble (1) FSL. [12]
Article 4 FSL. [13] Article 3 FSL. [14] Article 5 FSL. [15] Article 7 FSL. [16] Article 22 FSL.
[17] Article 29(1) FSL. [18] Article 29(2) FSL. [19] Article 29(5) FSL. [20] Article 29(6) FSL.
[21] Article 29(7) FSL. [22] Article 29(8) FSL. [23] Article 29(11) FSL. [24] Article 29(14)
FSL. [25] Article 29(15) FSL. [26] Article 29(16) FSL. [27] Article 29(17) FSL. [28] Article
29(18) FSL. [29] Article 29(19) FSL. [30] ibid (n 2). [31] Bernd Van der Meulen, ‘The Structure of European Food Law,’ Laws, April 2016, vol 2, pp. 69-98, at p. 70. [32] Ibid. [33]
Ibid. [34] Ibid. [35] See Consumer Protection Law of 2014, https://www.economy.gov.lb/
en/what-we-provide/consumer-protection/legislation/, last accessed 21 March 2021. [36] Republic of Lebanon, Ministry of Economy and Trade, https://www.economy.gov.lb/en/services/
consumer-protection/awareness-campaigns, last accessed 13 February 2021. [37] Republic of
Lebanon, Ministry of Economy and Trade, ‘Consumer Protection’, https://www.economy.gov.
lb/en/what-we-provide/consumer-protection/, last accessed 14 June 2021. [38] Zouhair Berro,
Who We Are, Consumers Lebanon, https://www.consumerslebanon.org/HomePage, last accessed 13 February 2021. [39] Articles 7-17 FSL. [40] Article 8 FSL. [41] Article 6 FSL.
[42] ‘Consumer protection advocates are waiting for the government to implement the provisions of the new food safety law, which they say will improve public health,’ The Daily Star,
https://www.dailystar.com.lb/GetArticleBody.aspx?id=323334&fromgoogle=1 last accessed
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
7
14 June 2021. [43] Article 4 FSL. [44] Commission of the European Communities, White Paper on Food Safety, Brussels, 12 January 2000, at p. 15. [45] World Trade Organization, The
WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement), January 1995, Articles 11-12, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/sps_e/spsagr_e.
htm, last accessed 15 June 2021. [46] About Codex | CODEXALIMENTARIUS FAO-WHO’
(Fao.org, 2018), http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/about-codex/en/ last accessed
15 June 2021.
Academia Letters, September 2021
©2021 by the author — Open Access — Distributed under CC BY 4.0
Corresponding Author: Maria El Gemayel, maria.el.gemayel@gmail.com
Citation: El Gemayel, M. (2021). Food Law in Lebanon: Overview and Analysis. Academia Letters, Article
3593. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3593.
8
Descargar