Psychological analysis and literary form

Psychological Analysis and Literary Form: A Study of the Doubles in Dostoevsky
Author(s): Lawrence Kohlberg
Source: Daedalus , Spring, 1963, Vol. 92, No. 2, Perspectives on the Novel (Spring, 1963),
pp. 345-362
Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20026782
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
American Academy of Arts & Sciences and The MIT Press are collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Daedalus
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
Psychological Analysis and Literary Form:
A Study of the Doubles in Dostoevsky
Psychology is a knife that cuts
both ways.
?The Brothers Karamazov
Illness, delirium, amnesia, but
why were you haunted by just those
delusions and not by any others?
?Crime and Punishment
To the psychologist looking at contemporary literature, there is a
rather paradoxical discrepancy between the impact of psychoanaly
sis upon creative and upon critical writing. While it is almost im
possible to find a serious modern novel or drama which would not be
profoundly different without the existence of psychoanalytic con
cepts, this can hardly be said for modern literary criticism.
A major factor in the impact of psychoanalytic ideas upon crea
tive writing is the ability of psychoanalysis to breathe new life into
old myths and literary forms. This invigorating effect springs in
large part from the psychoanalytic balance of concern for inward
forces and outward action, each revealing something otherwise
mysterious about the person. In contrast, die introspectionism of
the Jamesian psychological novel leads to an essential meaningless
ness of action, while the Hemingway or "new wave" behaviorism is
a complete denial of the meaning of the internal.
The revivifying effect of psychoanalysis upon old literary forms
is most clearly apparent in tragedy, which the Freudian world-view
makes meaningful for a scientifically oriented and morally relativistic
culture. Faithful to necessities apparent in its early Athenian form,
345
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
tragedy requires a crime to be committed which is both willed and
unwilled; both free and foreordained, a fated act for which the actor
is yet responsible. As tragic crime is foreordained but willed, so
tragic punishment is both doom and self-discovery of evil. In
Athenian tragedy, the fated aspects of crime and punishment were
the result of cruel but moral external forces. In the modern "psycho
analytic" form of tragedy, the fated aspects of crime and punishment
are the products of uncontrolled and unconscious internal forces.
The crime is the fated result of immutable instinctual impulses; the
inevitable doom which follows the crime is the result of unconscious
and inescapable needs for punishment. Other "scientific" world
views, such as the sociological determinism embodied in Dreiser's
American Tragedy, provide a sense of the inevitability of crime and
punishment. This inevitability, however, is the product of purely
external and amoral forces, and cannot be combined with the willed
self-discovery and repentance characteristic of classic tragedy.
In contrast with its revolutionary impact upon creative writing,
psychoanalysis seems of only minor importance to modern literary
criticism. The common awareness of psychological sickness and
symbol in a literary work is believed to detract, rather than add to,
understanding and appreciation of the work. Critics who feel that
this awareness can be used constructively, such as Burke, Guerard,
Hyman, Kazin, Trilling, and Wilson use psychoanalysis primarily as
myth, as one element or world-view among many which sensitize
the reader of a work of art to its meaning. The construction and
"proof" of a detailed psychoanalytic interpretation seems out of
place in such literary criticism.
Critical articles in the professional psychiatric journals present
a striking contrast. In these, the literary meaning of the work of art
is not considered as central to the analytic task. In contrast with the
critical use of psychoanalysis as sensitizing "myth," the professional
psychoanalyst attempts to use psychoanalytic theory to provide a
comprehensive and true explanation of why a given writer wrote
just what he did. He brings to literature the habits of the clinic
which require that a decision or diagnosis be made, and the habits
of a scientist which require that a hypothesis be judged, not as in
spiring, but as true or false.
Of all writers, none has elicited more of this case-study approach
than Dostoevsky, that archetype of the psychopathological genius.
Some of these studies, diagnosing Dostoevsky on the basis of bio
graphical data, as if he were a case to be committed to a hospital or
346
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
a course of therapy, have come to such conclusions as, "Dostoevsky
was an epileptic, schizophrene, paranoid type, complicated by
hysterical overlay."1 Other studies focus upon Dostoevsky's uncon
scious conflicts as projected into his novels. The classic example of
this type of study is Freud's essay on Dostoevsky,2 in which he views
Dostoevsky as preoccupied by parricidal impulses and resultant
guilt, a conflict projected into Dmitri and Ivan Karamazov. Still
other studies focus upon the analysis of a specific character in a
novel as if he were a real person, coming to such conclusions as that
"Raskolnikov was an autistic personality with traces of the manic
depressive"3 or that "Raskolnikov's murder was a result of efforts to
appease unconscious guilt due to an incestuous attachment to his
sister."4
Both academic psychologist and humanist question this sort of
study. In the first place, it is impossible to know whether these in
terpretations are true. The characters are not real people, the bio
graphical data on the author is inadequate, and a novel is not a
psychological projective-test response by an author. Even if the case
data were adequate, one could not achieve scientific certainty in the
interpretation of a single case. Few would disagree with Kris5 that
"It would seem as well demonstrated as any conclusion in the social
sciences that the struggle against incestuous impulses, dependency,
guilt, and aggression has remained a recurrent topic of Western
literature from Sophocles to Proust." The ubiquity of certain themes
in myth and hterature, though undeniable, does not, however, con
tribute to certainty of interpretation of any individual case.
The second reservation is an even more crucial one. What dif
ference does it make to the intelligent reader's understanding of a
novel to know that Dostoevsky had parricidal impulses or was an
epileptic schizophrene? Even Freud seems to agree with this caveat,
since he begins his essay on Dostoevsky as follows:
Four facets may be distinguished in the rich personality of Dostoevsky
?the creative artist, the neurotic, the moralist and the sinner. How is
one to find one's way in this bewildering complexity? The creative artist
is least doubtful. The Brothers Karamazov is the most magnificent novel
ever written. . . . Before the problem of the creative artist, analysis must,
alas, lay down its arms.
Freud would feel that his analysis of Dostoevsky helps explain
the power of Dostoevsky's novel in that "It can scarcely be owing to
chance that three of the masterpieces of all hterature Oedipus Rex,
Hamlet, and The Brothers Karamazov should all deal with the same
347
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
subject, parricide." In Freud's view, "parricide is the principal and
primal crime of humanity as well as of the individual, and the main
source of the sense of guilt"; and in some sense the power of The
Brothers Karamazov hes in its confrontation of the reader with his
own guilt-laden impulses in a situation in which identification with
the hero is at a sufficient distance to allow "catharsis through pity
and fear." Even if one granted this interpretation, it hardly explains
the difference between murder in Dostoevsky and murder in Mickey
Spillane.
The present paper is an effort to show that psychoanalysis need
not entirely "lay down its arms" before Dostoevsky, the creative
artist; it will use a psychological analysis to clarify two literary prob
lems important in the appreciation and understanding of Dostoev
sky's novels: the first, his use of Doubles; the second, his particular
and unique moral ideology.
In recent years, literary critics have come to believe that an
understanding of Dostoevsky's use of Doubles is the key to an under
standing of the structure of his novels, a key which radically revises
early critical views of Dostoevsky's novels as "badly constructed and
unwieldly." An example of such a recent structural or "technique"
interpretation of the Doubles is Beebe's analysis of Crime and Pun
ishment:
If we approach Crime and Punishment with a knowledge of Dosto
evsky's character and method of writing, we are likely to be surprised at
the disciplined skill the structure of the novel reveals. It meets the test
of unity in action; all the parts contribute to the whole and the parts may
be fully understood only when the whole is known. One of the ways in
which Dostoevsky unified his novel is through his technique of "doubles."
The dual nature of his heroes is, of course, a commonplace of criticism.
Because his protagonists are usually split personalities, the psychological
and philosophical drama in a Dostoevsky novel is expressed in terms of a
conflict between opposite poles of sensibility and intelhgence, self-sacrifice
and self-assertion, God-Man and Man-God, or sometimes "good" and
"bad." To dramatize this conflict, Dostoevsky often gives his characters
several alter-egos or doubles, each projecting one of the extremes of the
split personality. Even when the hero is not present in the scene, he may
represent the center of interest because the characters present, represent
different facets of his personality. According to most interpretations of
Crime and Punishment, the struggle within Raskolnikov becomes physical
external action as he wavers between Svidrigailov, epitome of self-willed
evil, and Sonia, epitome of self-sacrifice and spiritual goodness.*
* J. M. Beebe, "The Three Motives of Raskolnikov," in E. Wasiolek ( edi
tor), Crime and Punishment and the Critics (San Francisco: Wadeworth,
1961).
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
Dostoevsky's Doubles, however, are not mere portrayals of ties
between stereotyped representatives of good and evil to be found
throughout good and bad fiction. They obviously contain much
personal symbolic meaning and are intended to have a psychopatho
logical basis. They not only express ideological values and require
ments of plot but enact or express murders of kin, rapes of little girls,
spider fantasies, mutilation themes, epileptic attacks, suicide, necro
philia and hallucinations, and were viewed by Dostoevsky himself
as forms of psychopathology. The Raw Youth says: "What then pre
cisely is the 'double'? The 'double,' at any rate according to a medi
cal work by an expert which I read for the purpose is nothing but
the first stage in some serious mental derangement which may lead
to a bad conclusion, a dualism between f eeling and willing."
Not only does Dostoevsky view his Doubles as "psychopathologi
cal," but his preoccupation with Doubles precedes the ideological
and structural use he was to make of them in his later novels. This
preoccupation on a purely psychological level is expressed in Dosto
evsky's second novel, written before his Siberian exile and entided
The Double, a novel which he said "contained a great deal of
myself."
The hero of this novel, Golyadkin, is one of Dostoevsky's typical,
socially isolated petty officials desperately striving to maintain some
appearance of respectability in spite of poverty, social incompetence,
and deep feehngs of inferiority. He awakes in a clouded state, on
the verge of a breakdown, believing that something is being got up
against him by his colleagues at the office, that there is a conspiracy
afloat, that his reputation has been blackened and that his enemies
are trying to ruin him.
After consulting his doctor he decides to attend a ball that eve
ning given by his former patron ("who has been a father to him") in
honor of his daughter. Golyadkin has not been invited and is under
a cloud because of some unspecified recent behavior. He is refused
admission by the footman, but enters the house surreptitiously and
lurks in the corridor. Suddenly in contradiction to his usual self
effacement, some mysterious brazen impulse "projects" him into the
ballroom and leads him to insist on dancing with the daughter. He is
ignominiously thrown out on the street.
He then wanders about the streets and contemplates suicide by
drowning. He has an uncanny feeling that there is someone near,
and in terror recognizes the presence of a Double, a figure exactly
hke himself, who accompanies him home.
349
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
The next day, he finds the Double ensconced at a desk at his
office, as if he had always worked there, ingratiating himself with
his colleagues and superiors, and ridiculing Golyadkin. All of this
Golyadkin II's misconduct is blamed on Golyadkin I, while Golyad
kin II gets credit for all of Golyadkin I's efforts. Golyadkin views
the Double as an indecent, shameless, malevolent toady but never
theless attempts to be friendly with him and is insulted and humili
ated for his pains.
After agonies of humiliation, rage, fear, and suspicion, Golyadkin
believes a solution awaits him. He believes he has received a note
from the daughter of his patron asking him to elope with her and
arranging a rendezvous. He awaits her at the appointed time in
hiding outside her house, just as he had in the episode preceding the
emergence of the Double. His Double trots out and hustles him into
the house where a crowd is gathered, staring at him. He is suddenly
surrounded by an "infinite procession of Golyadkins noisily bursting
in at every door of the room." He is carried away to the lunatic
asylum by his own cruel doctor while the Double hangs on to the
carriage door and pokes his head in the window.
In this tale, Dostoevsky's use of the Double theme of Hoffman
and Gogol does not achieve any grand artistic purpose, but it does
offer a compelling picture of psychopathology. Accordingly, we shall
attempt to settle the purely diagnostic questions about the Double
phenomena it presents before considering the literary meanings of
the Double themes.
The only serious treatment of The Double from a psychopatho
logical view is provided in a monograph written in the early
twenties by Otto Rank, Freud's "most gifted follower."6 Rank pro
claims the novel to be a classic portrayal of a paranoid state. There
are indeed strong resemblances between the phenomena presented
in The Double and familiar psychiatric phenomena of paranoid
states. Paranoid delusions or hallucinations of persecutory figures
emerge from feelings of shame and pathologically low self-esteem.
These delusions are presumed to be the result of the defence
mechanism of "disowning projection." Shameful impulses and tend
encies toward self-accusation are denied as belonging to the self and
are projected upon external imagined enemies. Obviously Dostoev
sky intended Golyadkin II to be a hallucination representing the
assertive, shameless impulses which first "propelled" Golyadkin I
into his patron's ballroom, since the novel ends with the double
propelling him again into the same ballroom. Golyadkin I's sense of
350
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
low esteem, his feehng that he is being intrigued against, his life in
a world in which he makes and receives veiled threats and innuen
does, are indeed striking portrayals of the paranoid attitude.
It also seems likely that The Double may have expressed one of
Dostoevsky's states at the time of the writing of the novel, a state of
feeling humiliated and "persecuted" in connection with the outbreak
of previously unsuspected or unacknowledged qualities in his own
personality. Just previous to writing The Double, the success of
Poor Folk had completely turned his head and transformed him from
a shy, sensitive, aloof romantic to someone capable of writing such
statements as the following to his brother:
Well brother, I believe my fame is just now in its fullest flower.
Everybody looks on me as a wonder of the world. If I but open my
mouth the air resounds with what Dostoevsky said, what Dostoevsky
means to do. . . . Bielinky declares Turgenev has quite lost his heart to
me. ... All the Minnas, Claras, Mariannas, etc., have got amazingly
pretty, but cost a lot of money.7
The reaction of his acquaintances to this sort of bombast was to
nickname Dostoevsky "the literary pimple." Indeed, The Double
commences with Golyadkin saying: "A fine thing if something un
toward had happened today and a strange pimple had come up."
Presumably his double was the "literary pimple" which erupted that
day from within Golyadkin's personality.
In spite of these considerations, The Double is not the portrayal
of a genuine psychiatric phenomenon of paranoia, as Dostoevsky
himself may have believed. While the feelings of persecution and
the disowning of part of the self portrayed in The Double have
psychiatric parallels in paranoid states, the experience of a hallu
cinatory duplicate of the self is not explained by, or consistent with,
a paranoid psychosis. The typical paranoid concept is one of a spot
less self being unjustly blamed and tortured by evil others. In con
trast, Dostoevsky's hallucinatory or semi-hallucinatory Doubles per
secute their creators by asserting their identity with them, and
usually their creators are aware that the Double is their "other self."
Stavrogin says of his hallucinations (in the suppressed chapter of
The Possessed):
It shows different faces and characters yet it is always the same. I
know it is different aspects of myself splitting themselves off yet it wants
to be an independent devil so an independent devil it must be.
Such self-awareness is quite ahen to the paranoid state. If the
351
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
paranoid persecutors were to be experienced as duplicates of the
self, the defensive function of the hallucinations would break down,
since they would no longer protect the self against the awareness
that it is the possessor of shameful impulses.
Another "popular-psychiatry" concept often used by literary
critics, the "split personality," is equally inadequate as an accurate
interpretation of the Double phenomenon. This concept is suggested
by Versilov in The Raw Youth who says:
I am really split in two mentally, and I am horribly afraid of it. It is
just as though one's second self were standing beside one; one is sensible
and rational oneself, but the other self is compelled to do something per
fecdy senseless and sometimes very funny; and suddenly you notice you
are longing to do that amusing thing, goodness knows why. I once knew
a doctor who suddenly began whistling in church, at his father's funeral.
These divided selves of Dostoevsky do not, however, correspond
to psychiatric notions of the "split personality." The most common
psychiatric conception of the "split personality" refers to the hysteri
cal phenomenon of multiple personalities, the Three Faces of Eve;
each living a Jekyll and Hyde existence in independence of one
another. Unlike such multiple personalities, the "selves" within any
of Dostoevsky's figures are simultaneously aware of one another.
These "split selves" have equally httle to do with schizophrenia, in
the sense in which this has been misleadingly mistranslated as "split
personality."
Dostoevsky's consciously "split" characters do present classical
symptoms of the obsessive-compulsive character, however. The
"split" is not a separation of selves, it is an obsessive balancing or
undoing of one idea or force with its opposite. Most character
istically, a sacred idea compulsively arouses a degrading idea; the
sacredness of the father's funeral compels the impulse to whist?e.
The hero of Notes from Underground says, "At the very moment
when I am most capable of feeling every refinement of all that is
good and beautiful it would, as though by design, happen to me not
only to feel, but to do, such ugly things."
Not only impulse and counter-impulse, but belief and disbelief
are opposed and simultaneously felt in a compulsion neurosis. Ac
cording to Ivan's devil, "Some can contemplate such depths of belief
and disbelief at the same moment that sometimes it really seems as
if they are within a hairbreadth of being turned upside down."
Psychoanalysts view these obsessional oppositions as represent
ing conflicts derived from a battie of wills in early childhood, center
352
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
ing around training conflicts. According to Erikson s Childhood and
Society, this conflict is between autonomy and shame or doubt.
Shame, Erikson says, "is an emotion insufficientiy studied because in
our culture it is so early and easily absorbed by guilt. Shame sup
poses that one is completely exposed and conscious of being looked
at, i.e. self-conscious. It is essentially rage turned against the self."
The "Underground" man tells us:
With an intense acute pang I was stabbed to the heart by the
thought that ten years, twenty years, forty years would pass and even in
forty years I would remember with loathing and humiliation those
filthiest, most ludicrous, and awful moments of my life. No one could
have gone out of his way to degrade himself more shamelessly, and I
fully realized it, fully, and yet I went on.
In the self-abasers, feelings of shame are responded to by further
self-abasement, since such self-lowering debases and denies the
others before whom shame is felt. Fyodor Karamazov says, "I feel
when I meet people that I am lower than all and that they all take
me for a buffoon, so I say let me play the buffoon for you are, every
one of you, lower than I."
The psychoanalytic notion of the obsessional character focused
on a conflict between autonomy and shame helps us understand a
very puzzling aspect of the literary structure of Notes from Under
ground. The book is composed of two quite different parts: the first
an ideological discussion, the second a presentation of some ex
cursions in self-degradation. The ideological portion is an assertion
of the need for free will, rational or irrational, against the rational
determinism of Western scientific thought. The other half of the
work is the expression of the "shame-humiliation syndrome." Some
unity in these two parts of the book is provided by the emotional
congruity of a personality type in whom the desperate need for
freedom from domination or control is hnked to the cycle of shame
and denial of others.
This analysis of Dostoevsky's "split personalities" as related to
obsessional ambivalence and shame does not direcdy aid us in un
derstanding his Doubles. There is, however, a very direct psychiatric
parallel to the kind of hallucination described in The Double. This
parallel is the "autoscopic syndrome," a syndrome with no relation
ship to paranoid states. A typical case is that of Mrs. A:
Mrs. A returned home from her husband's funeral and when she
opened the door to her bedroom, she immediately became aware of the
presence of somebody else in the room. In the twilight she noticed a lady
353
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
in front of her. Under the light she noticed that the stranger wore an
exact replica of her own coat, hat, and veil. Mrs. A was neither surprised
nor afraid and began to undress. The lady in black did exactly the same.
Only then looking into the strangers face, did Mrs. A become aware that
it was she herself, as if in a mirror, that it was her 'double,' her 'second
self looking at her. She felt it was more alive and warm than she was her
self. Feeling tired and weary, she lay down on her bed. As soon as she
closed her eyes, the apparition disappeared. She felt stronger and when
she opened her eyes, the apparition was not visible. Since that evening
she had been visited almost daily by her 'astral body,' as she called it,
mostly at dusk when she was alone. Of the double she says, 'In a detached
intellectual way I am fully aware that my double is only a hallucination.
Yet I see it; I hear it; I feel it with my senses. Emotionally I feel it as a
living part of myself. It is me split and divided. It is all so confusing.'8
Almost everything Mrs. A says is echoed by one or another of
Dostoevsky's Double-haunted figures. The physical details of the
appearance of Dostoevsky's hallucinatory Double are very close to
those described by autoscopic patients. Ivan's satanic Double has
frozen in his trip through space, and is underdressed in summer
clothes, though it is winter; autoscopic Doubles are typically cold,
often described as bringing "a breeze of cold air." As in autoscopic
experiences, Dostoevsky's Doubles appear at dusk or night, typically
when the subject is alone in his bedroom. Like them, Dostoevsky's
Doubles tend to be colorless, to be described in shades of grey.
Surprisingly, the likelihood of Dostoevsky's having experienced
the autoscopic syndrome has not been mentioned in the extensive
psychological literature on Dostoevsky. Nevertheless, there is good
reason to believe that he actually had these experiences. While the
autoscopic syndrome is rare, it is often linked with severe epilepsy
of the sort known to have affected Dostoevsky. The syndrome is
extremely puzzling since it is found associated with a variety of con
ditions, usually organic (epilepsy, parietal brain damage, and severe
migraine) but occasionally purely emotional (schizoid personality,
depressions).
There is reason to beheve that an unusual number of writers
have experienced autoscopic hallucinations. Maupassant definitely
had hallucinations of a duplicate self in the middle stages of his
syphilitic or paretic psychosis,9 hallucinations quite faithfully de
scribed in Le Horla. Some writers without organic pathology defi
nitely experienced the autoscopic syndrome, including Hoffman, de
Musset, Richter and probably Poe.10 The phenomenon represents a
projection of the body-image into space, or a loss of bodily coordi
nates of the body image. The variations in reported emotional re
354
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
actions to autoscopic hallucinations are striking: sometimes satisfac
tion, sometimes sadness, sometimes dread, sometimes indifference.
There does not seem to be a single emotional meaning or genesis
common to all cases of the autoscopic syndrome. While the psychi
atric label provides a basis for understanding Dostoevsky's preoccu
pation with Doubles, it does not seem to specify their meaning to
him or to his novels.
To cast further light on this problem, we must consider the
variety of Doubles in Dostoevsky's other novels. We may best begin
with some findings from a statistical study of Dostoevsky's char
acters. Our study made use of a method called "Q technique,"11 de
signed to bring some objectivity of inference into the analysis of the
single case. Both Dostoevsky and his characters were rated on a
large number of traits, both psychoanalytic and ideological. The
results were factor analyzed to define types of character in relation
to Dostoevsky's own personality.
Undoubtedly this effort to control statistically the psychology
which "cuts both ways" would cause its subject to repeat in anguish
the famous statement in Notes from Underground about "hfe in
the Crystal Palace":
All human actions will then be tabulated according to these laws,
mathematically, hke tables of logarithms. But man still is man and not the
key of a piano and even if it were proved to him by science and mathe
matics that he were nothing but a piano key, even then he would not be
come reasonable but would purposely do something perverse simply to
gain his point; if necessary, he will contrive destruction and chaos and
sufferings and launch a curse upon the world. If you say all this, too, can
be calculated and tabulated?chaos, darkness, and curses, so that the
mere possibility of calculating it all beforehand would stop it all, and
mathematical reason would reassert itself?then man would purposely go
mad in order to be rid of reason and gain his point!
The "chaos, darkness, suffering and curses" of Dostoevsky's char
acters proved quite amenable to tabulation and defined very stable,
clearcut types in the factor analysis. These types were the same
(i.e., characters were divided into the same groups) whether psy
choanalytic or ideological traits were used as the basis for type
formation.12
The types which resulted are not hkely to make the conventional
literary critic "defy mathematical reason," since they are not very
different from those familiar in the Dostoevsky criticism. These
types are defined by the entries in Table 1. As one reads down the
table for a given type, the presence of a number indicates that this
355
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
Table 1
Six Character-Type Factors Defined by the Loading of 34 Characters Upon Them
Characters: Types:
I II III IV VWill VI
Bad Christ Self- Fern- Mur-
Doubles Figures Abasers mines dere
1. Dostoevsky himself 43 28 31
Brothers Karamazov:
2. Fyodor (father) 70
3. Dmitri 58
4. Ivan 51
5. Alyosha 81
6. Smerdyakov 40
7. Grushenka 63 35
8. Katerina I. 70
9. Snegirov 74
10. Zossima (monk) 73
11. The Devil 74
The Idiot:
12. Myshkin 76
13. Rogozhin 65
14. Aglaia 72
15. Ippolit 54 45
16. Nastasya 45
Underground Notes:
17. Narrator 45
The Possessed:
18. Stavrogin 41 55
19. PyotrV. 58
20. Kirrilov 59 46
21. Shatov 71
22. Lisa D. 46 45
23. Stepan V. (father of P.) 64
The Double:
24. Golyadkin I 69 19
25. Golyadkin II 71
Crime and Punishment:
26. Katerina Marm. 52 51
27. Svidrigailov 61
28. Sonia 63
29. Dounia (sister) 40 45
30. Raskolnikov 54
31. Marmeladov 75
Psychiatric Types:
32. Paranoid 40
33. Hysteric 53 30
34. Psychopath 69
356
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
character is a representative of that type. The size of the number is
an index of the "goodness" or purity of the character as a representa
tive of the given type.
The types defined in Table 1 are useful in sketching out the
meaning of Dostoevsky's Doubles. The most unique of Dostoevsky's
Doubles are hallucinations (Golyadkin II in The Double and the
devils in The Possessed and The Brothers Karamazov). These hallu
cinations persecute their flesh and blood counterparts by insisting
on the fundamental identity of the two. These hallucinatory Doubles
are all our Type I "bad Doubles," and they are imagined by our
Type V "will murderers." Raters assigned high scores to Type I
characters on the traits: "A mysterious and sinister affinity to another
character," "Is a Double who is an intellectual inferior, a caricature
of his alter-ego," "Is a persecuting Double." Type V characters
tended to be rated high on the complementary traits, e.g., "Is perse
cuted by a Double."
A second type of Double is defined by the figures of Smerdyakov
in The Brothers Karamazov and Pyotr Verkhovensky in The Pos
sessed. These flesh and blood characters were distinct from the
hallucinatory Doubles on the psychoanalytic traits but not the
ideological. They are "psychopathic" figures who carry out murders
wished for by the "paranoids" Ivan and Stavrogin, and are mysteri
ous "half-brothers" to them.
Still a third type of Double is represented by the Christ-figures
of our Type II. These Christ-figures, with the exception of Sonia in
Crime and Punishment, have alter-egos among our Type VI im
pulsives. These relations, hke those last mentioned, are described
in a terminology of "brother" and "sister," real or spiritual. Prince
Myshkin has a mysterious affinity to Rogozhin and to Nastasya in
The Idiot, both an attraction and a feehng of a hnkage of fate.
Alyosha Karamazov is, in a somewhat similar sense, an alter-ego to
his brother Dmitri who enacts sexual and aggressive impulses which
Alyosha somehow shares. Dmitri tells him:
I want to tell you now about the insects to whom God gave sensual
lust. I am that insect, brother, and all we Karamazovs are such insects,
and, angel as you are, that insect lives in you, too, and will stir up a
tempest in your blood.
Like Myshkin, Alyosha knows his impulsive Double will attempt
murder, dreads it, but is strangely paralyzed or passive about pre
venting it. In some sense, Type VI, the impulsives, seem to repre
sent or enact the impulses of Type II, the Christ-figures, just as
357
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
Type I figures enact the impulses of Type V, the "paranoid" will
murderers. The relationship between Types I and V is exphcit and
consciously intended by Dostoevsky, while the relationship between
Type II and VI is much more cloudy and undefined.
Our statistically derived map shows many clear-cut and recur
ring aspects to Dostoevsky's Doubles. These are not the result of
the requirements of structure of a particular book since they are
repeated from novel to novel. They are also not explained, however,
by mere knowledge that Dostoevsky may have experienced the auto
scopic phenomenon. The autoscopic Doubles are assigned a definite
evil personality constant from book to book and are in some mysteri
ous way part of a world including good-and-evil, flesh-and-blood
alter-egos.
To enrich our notion of the meaning of these facts in relation to
the autoscopic syndrome, we may turn to Otto Rank's discussion of
"The Double as Immortal Self" in his last book, Beyond Psychology.
No better example of the fact that "psychology is a knife which cuts
both ways" can be provided than Rank's two writings on the Double.
His first treatment is an orthodox psychoanalytic interpretation; his
second written thirty years later is part of his own effort to form a
theory which is "Beyond Psychology," i.e., beyond psychoanalysis.
Rank's last discussion of literary Doubles is based on his postula
tion of a universal striving for immortality or rebirth in man's non
instinctual but irrational will. This striving is especially strong in
the artist type, says Rank in Art and the Artist, since the urge to
create is essentially the urge to immortalize the self. While the
average individual takes himself as given, the artist (and the neu
rotic who is essentially an artist manqu?) cannot. The artist is con
tinually striving to remold his ego in terms of self-created ideals, in
order to perpetuate or immortalize himself. This perpetually re
created or reborn self is projected and justified in the art work.
In Beyond Psychology, Rank also postulates the immortalizing
tendency as underlying social ideologies and forms of social organi
zation, through which the individual attains collective immortality.
Rank believes that one point at which the individual, self-immortaliz
ing needs of the artist intersect with collective ideologies is in the
literary use of the Double. This literary use parallels genuine folk
beliefs in many primitive cultures, as well as mythological themes.
In these primitive cultures there is an equation of the individual's
soul when alive, his ghost after death, and his actual shadow. This
shadow-soul survives the individual's death, and may sometimes
358
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
leave the body in sleep, etc. There may, however, be some differ
ences in appearance and character between the actual self and the
ghostly Double.
Rank points out that in modern hterature, the Double is usually
a symbol of a character's past, his evil tendencies and his death
rather than of future immortality, as in naive folk-beliefs. A typical
example is E. T. A. Hoffman's Story of the Lost Reflection, in which
the hero sells his mirror reflection (his "immortal soul") to a devil
figure. This reflection takes on a life of its own and persecutes its
former owner until the victim attempts to kill it and so kills himself.
(Wilde's Picture of Dorian Grey presents a similar theme.) Rank
explains the modern negative attitude toward the Double as due to
modern man's over-rationalistic alienation from life and death and
from his own fundamentally irrational will.
Rank sees folk-beliefs and myths of the Double as related to the
wide-spread mythology of twins. A common theme of myth is that
of twins who have creative powers and who found cities and cul
tures (e.g., Romulus and Remus). Often in these myths, one twin is
killed by the other, or is killed in his place. Rank interprets this as
indicating a concept of the twins as Doubles, one of whom becomes
immortal and creative through the death of his mortal counterpart.
According to Rank, primitive cultures see Doubles and twins as
duplicate selves necessary for immortality, just as patriarchal cul
tures see the son as a duphcate of the father, necessary for immor
tality.
Rank apphes these suggestive ideas to Dostoevsky's Doubles in
only a vague, brief and superficial fashion. Their importance, how
ever, is suggested by the clinical literature on the autoscopic syn
drome.13 A number of the cases reported are like those of Mrs. A,
cases in which the Double first appears immediately after the death
of a significant person. In some sense the Double seems to be a sub
stitute or resurrection of the lost person. In other cases, the Double
represents, not a "resurrected self" but the self as dead. De Musset,
just after walking through a cemetery, saw a hallucination of "a
mysterious stranger which he recognized with terror as himself,
twenty years older, with features ravaged by debauchery, eyes
aghast with fear." A clinical case is reported of a woman in great
anxiety, about to enter the hospital for surgical completion of a mis
carriage, who was suddenly confronted by a realistic vision of her
self lying in a coffin. This was the first appearance of a recurring
mirror-like hallucination of a Double.14
359
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
Our discussion suggests a close connection between Double or
autoscopic experiences and epilepsy on the one hand, and concern
about death and immortality on the other. Dostoevsky's extreme
concern with death and immortality was expressed both in ideologi
cal and in symptomatic behavior.
On the ideological level, he wrote: "Without a superior idea,
there cannot exist either the individual or the nation. But here on
earth we have only one superior idea?the immortality of the soul
because all other superior ideas have their source in this idea."15
On the symptomatic level, his fear of death was associated with
his epileptic attacks. An attack was triggered off by passing a chance
funeral procession. The association of death and epilepsy led him to
fears of being buried alive, of being closed in for eternity. He would
leave notes that he should not be buried for five days after an attack.
His own Siberian sentence he viewed as a living burial after his near
execution: "It is difficult to express how much I have suffered. These
four years I look upon as a time of living burial. I was put in a
coffin."16 These feelings suggest that he feared not only death, but
his own ghosdy immortality in the face of his apparent death to
the world.
Dostoevsky told his friends that his epileptic attacks were asso
ciated not only with fear of death and ghostly immortality, but with
the joyful experiences of eternal hfe described by his epileptic fig
ures Myshkin and Kirrilov.
The association we would expect between epilepsy, experiences
of immortality, and the Double phenomenon is found in the
grouping of these traits in Dostoevsky's characters. A number of
both the Type II good Doubles (Myshkin, Kirrilov, Alyosha) and
the Type I bad Doubles (Smerdyakov) have epileptic or epileptic
like seizures, while none of the other characters are portrayed as
epileptic. In the good Doubles epilepsy is connected with a high
rating on the trait, "Joyful experience in which eternal life is col
lapsed into an instant." All the Type I good Doubles are rated high
on the trait, "Lives for and believes in positive immortality." Of
Alyosha, Dostoevsky says: "As soon as he reflected seriously, he
was convinced of the existence of God and immortality and in
stinctively said to himself: 'I want to hve for immortality and I will
accept no compromise.' "
If Dostoevsky's Type II good Doubles express his ideas, concerns
and experiences of positive immortality, his Type I bad Doubles
express his ideas and experience of negative immortality, of living
360
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Doubles in Dostoevsky
burial. Svidrigailov says: "We always imagine eternity as something
beyond our conception, something vast. But why must it be vast?
Instead of all that, what if it is one little room, like a bathhouse in
the country, black and grimey and spiders in every corner, and that's
all eternity is?"
Dostoevsky intended this to be a reflection of his Siberian 'liv
ing burial" and wrote of Crime and Punishment, "My Dead House
was really most interesting. And here again shall be a picture of a
hell, of the same kind as that 'Turkish Bath in the Prison' ( a chapter
in the House of the Dead on the horrors of a multitude of naked,
filthy bodies closely packed together in the prisoners' weekly steam
bath)."17
Svidrigailov in Crime and Punishment and Stavrogin in The
Possessed are flesh and blood characters who are sinister alter-egos
to others. Both also experience hallucinations which are directly said
to represent the ghosts or resurrections of dead or murdered per
sons. In the passage on eternity just mentioned, Svidrigailov dis
cussed his hallucinations of his dead wife Marfa (whom he has mis
treated and probably murdered) and of a servant whom he drove to
suicide. These hallucinations are not only experienced but believed
in by Svidrigailov, who says, "I agree that ghosts only appear to the
sick, but that only proves they are unable to appear except to the
sick, not that they don't exist."
Stavrogin also has two related sets of hallucinations (described
in the suppressed chapter of The Possessed). One is of the devil, the
other is of the twelve-year-old girl whom he seduced and led to
suicide.
At first sight, hallucinatory Doubles in the novels would seem to
be one thing, and flesh and blood alter-egos another. The line of
thinking we have pursued suggests, however, that the "living" bad
Doubles may have a meaning similar to that of the "hallucinatory"
bad Doubles. As in the case of Mrs. A, the Double is both a resur
rection of a dead person and is the self.
editor's note:
Dr. Kohlberg plans an expanded version of this article which will be
published in the book based on this issue. His longer article will consider
more fully the relationship of the Dostoevskyan Doubles?in Crime and
Punishment, The Possessed, The Idiot, and The Brothers Karamazov?
both to literary structures and to the moral ideologies they convey. It will
involve more directly psychoanalytic interpretations as well as a fuller
361
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
LAWRENCE KOHLBERG
statistical treatment. The preliminary findings are striking. The hallucina
tory devil appears to be, according to Dr. Kohlberg's factor analysis, a
resurrection of the murdered father. Psychoanalytically, the hallucinatory
Doubles represent evil masculine sexuality, expressed in the defilement of
young girls, while the "twin Doubles" represent a masculine identification
on "an unnatural homosexual rather than on an unnatural heterosexual
base." The "good Doubles" are Christ figures, whose major identification
is with the shame and suffering of women, which they share but for which
they feel guilty. These psychoanalytic meanings appear to clarify the
sequences of appearances of the Doubles, as well as Dostoevsky's ideology
of vicarious guilt and suffering.
References
1. P. C. Squires, "Fyodor Dostoevsky, A Psychopathographical Sketch" in Psy
choanalytic Review, 24 (1937), pp. 365-388.
2. Sigmund Freud, "Dostoevsky and Parricide" in Collected Papers, Vol. V
(London: Hogarth, 1950).
3. Smith and Isotoff, "Dostoevsky: the Abnormal from Within" in Psycho
analytic Review, 22 (1935), pp. 385-403.
4. Edna C. Florance, "The Neurosis of Raskolnikov; A Study in Incest and
Murder" in Archives of Criminal Psychodynamics, 1 (1955), pp. 344-396.
5. E. Kris, Psychoanalytic Exploration in Art (New York: International Uni
versity Press, 1952), Chapter 1. This chapter provides a good summary of
recent psychoanalytic "ego-psychology" approaches to literature.
6. Otto Rank, "Der Doppelg?nger" (Vienna: Internationale Psychoanalytische
Verlag, 1925). Translated into French as "Don Juan, une ?tude sur le
double" (Paris, 1932).
7. The Letters of Fyodor Dostoevsky (New York: Horizon, 1961).
8. N. Lukianowicz, "Autoscopic Phenomena" in Archives of Neurology and
Psychiatry, 80 (1958), p. 199. This article is perhaps the best summary of
clinical data on this phenomena, along with Reference 10.
9. S. Coleman, "The Phantom Double, Its Psychological Significance" in British
Journal of Medical Psychology, 14 (1934), pp. 254-273.
10. J. Todd and K. Dewhurst, "The Double: Its Psychopathology and Psycho
physiology" in Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 122 (1955), pp.
47-56.
11. W. Stephenson, Q Technique: The Study of Behavior (Chicago: Univer
sity of Chicago Press, 1953).
12. The detailed methods and results of this study will be reported in a pro
fessional psychological journal.
13. Lukianowicz, op. cit.
14. Todd and Dewhurst, op. cit.
15. Diary of a Writer (New York: Braziller, 1954).
16. The Letters of Fyodor Dostoevsky.
17. Loc. cit
362
This content downloaded from
186.55.26.0 on Fri, 12 May 2023 00:24:45 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms