Subido por Jose Diaz

1-s2.0-S0960148121016694-main

Anuncio
Renewable Energy 184 (2022) 176e181
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Renewable Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/renene
The position of the sun based on a simplified model
Finley R. Shapiro
Department of Engineering, Leadership, and Society, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 20 May 2021
Received in revised form
6 October 2021
Accepted 23 November 2021
Available online 26 November 2021
A simplified model for the position of the sun at any location on earth is shown to produce fairly accurate
results when compared to values calculated in a spreadsheet from the United States National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). A straightforward derivation of the model is presented, in which all
terms and parameters have clear physical meaning. In the first version of the model, the only parameters
are the tilt of the earth's axis and the date and time of the nearest northern hemisphere winter solstice.
The differences between the elevation and azimuth calculated using the model and the NOAA results are
typically a few degrees or less, and it is seen that the primary cause of these differences is the eccentricity
of the earth's orbit. A simple correction is then added to the model, in which the only parameters are the
earth's orbital eccentricity and the date and time of the perihelion nearest the solstice already in the
model. This removes most of the differences between the model and the NOAA results. The model is
shown to work in both the northern and southern hemispheres.
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Sun position
Solar position
Analemma
Eccentricity
Azimuth
Elevation
1. Introduction
The position of the sun in the sky as a function of time is
important for predicting the performance of solar energy systems
[1e7], determining the sunlight striking building walls and passing
through windows [8], and other applications [9]. A review is found
in Ref. [10]. Many papers on calculations of the position of the sun,
such as [11e19], show equations for the elevation and azimuth of
the sun's position as a function of time and date. No derivation is
given for many of the equations in these papers, and some parameters have seven or more digits but are not given any physical
meaning. Complicated derivations of equations for the position of
the sun are found in Refs. [20,21].
This paper provides a very simplified and easily understood
astronomical model to show the origins of equations for the
elevation and azimuth of the sun. In the initial model, the earth's
orbit is a circle and the earth is a sphere. The only parameters are
the date and time of the nearest winter solstice, the tilt of the
earth's axis, and the length of a year by the Gregorian calendar. The
results are compared to the output of a spreadsheet from the Earth
System Research Laboratories' Global Monitoring Laboratory of the
United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) [22]. The comparison shows how close the calculated position in the basic model is to the actual solar position. The
E-mail address: frs37@drexel.edu.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.084
0960-1481/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
differences due to other phenomena are relatively small, but still
significant, and analysis shows that the primary cause of the differences is the eccentricity of the earth's orbit.
A simplified correction for the eccentricity of the earth's orbit is
then added to the model, using only the date and time of the
perihelion nearest to the winter solstice already used in the
calculation, the eccentricity of the earth's orbit, and Kepler's second
law. This correction removes most of the differences between the
original model and the NOAA calculation.
There are many applications in which the errors in this simple
model are small compared to other uncertainties. These include
applications in which the weather has a major influence on the
overall sunlight that is received by a photovoltaic or solar thermal
collector, or when the exact orientation of a collector varies over its
surface or over the time of the experiment.
2. Derivation of the model
We begin with the earth at its position at the moment of the
northern hemisphere winter solstice, as shown in Fig. 1. The z direction is perpendicular to the plane of the earth's orbit, and the y
direction is from the sun to the earth's position at this moment.
At the winter solstice it is solar midnight at some longitude that
is at a position directly opposite the sun. The winter solstice in
December 2020 was on 21 December at 10:03 universal time, so the
longitude of solar midnight was 4s ¼ -150.75 , where negative
longitude is to the west and positive longitude is to the east of the
F.R. Shapiro
Renewable Energy 184 (2022) 176e181
Fig. 1. The northern end of earth's axis points approximately toward Polaris, the North Star. At the winter solstice, the earth's orbital position is also in the direction of Polaris. The z
and y axes in the coordinate system are shown.
Greenwich meridian. For comparison, Anchorage Alaska is
at 149.9 and Honolulu Hawaii is at 157.9 .
If the earth had no tilt with respect to the orbital plane, then an
observer at longitude 4s and latitude L would have a zenith vector
ð0; cos L; sin LÞ at the winter solstice. An observer at a different
longitude 4 would have a zenith vector
cos qZ ¼ cos L sinðst þ 4 4s Þsin ut
cos a cos L cosðst þ 4 4s Þcos ut sin a sin L cos ut
The same form is found in other models.
The unit vector pointing from the center of the earth to the
South Pole is
0
1
0
@
U ¼ sin a A
cos a
0
1
cos L sinð4 4s Þ
@
Z ¼
cos L cosð4 4s Þ A
sin L
0
(1)
At a time t after the winter solstice, the direction of this zenith
vector would be
1
cos L sinðst þ 4 4s Þ
Z ðtÞ ¼ @ cos L cosðst þ 4 4s Þ A
sin L
H ¼ U ðU , ZÞZ
(2)
1
ZðtÞ ¼ @ 0
0
0
0
cos a
sin a
R ¼ S ðS , ZÞZ
(9)
R and H do not have unit length. The sun's azimuth angle
relative to due south as seen by the observer is the angle between
these two vectors.
These equations were programmed into a spreadsheet in
Microsoft Excel. The sun's azimuth angle as measured by the
observer clockwise from north is calculated as
1
0
0
sin a AZ ðtÞ
cos a
1
cos L sinðst þ 4 4s Þ
¼ @ cos a cos L cosðst þ 4 4s Þ þ sin a sin L A
sin a cos L cosðst þ 4 4s Þ þ cos a sin L
(8)
The projection on to the same plane of the vector pointing to the
sun is
where s is the rotation speed of the earth. However, the earth is
actually tilted at an angle a ¼ 23:44 toward Polaris, the North Star.
So the actual zenith vector of the observer is
0
(7)
which is independent of time in this model. The observer will see
due south as the direction of the projection of this vector on to the
plane perpendicular to the unit zenith vector Z. This vector is
0
0
(6)
(3)
g ¼ DEGREESðATAN2ðR , H; Z , ðR HÞÞÞ þ 180
(10)
The time of the earth's rotation is found from the length the
which has unit length.
At a time t, the unit vector
0
1
sin ut
SðtÞ ¼ @ cos ut A
0
(4)
points from the earth to the sun, assuming a circular orbit where u
is the earth's angular velocity around the sun. Therefore, the
observer will see an angle between zenith and the sun as
qZ ¼ cos1 ðZ , SÞ
(5)
The elevation of the sun above the horizon is 90 Combining equations (3)e(5), we get
qZ .
Fig. 2. Elevation and azimuth of the sun at Latitude 39.956 and Longitude 75.1878
as calculated by the model, for 7 October 2020, 21 December 2020, 20 April 2021 and
20 June 2021.
177
F.R. Shapiro
Renewable Energy 184 (2022) 176e181
Gregorian year, 365.2425 days. The period of a rotation, the sidereal
period, is calculated as
24 ,
365:2425
¼ 23 hours 56 minutes 4:09 seconds
366:2425
(11)
The rotation rate is
s¼
2p 366:2425
radians hour
,
24 365:2425
(12)
The times in the calculation shown here are referenced to the
winter solstice on December 21, 2020 at 10:03 UT. Fig. 2 shows the
position of the sun as calculated by the model for 4 dates at
Latitude þ39.956 and Longitude 75.1878 , the approximate
location of the author's office.
Fig. 4. The difference between the azimuth calculated by the model and the values
from the NOAA spreadsheet.
3. Comparison with a more accurate model
Figs. 3 and 4 show the difference between the elevation and
azimuth from the model and the values from the NOAA spreadsheet
on three dates, 30 December 2020, 16 February 2021, and 6 April
2021. The first is a local minimum in the daily root mean square
difference (discussed below), the third is a local maximum, and the
second is a date about half way between the first and the third.
While these differences, up to 2.15 in elevation and up to 3.1 in
azimuth, are too big for navigation applications, they may be
acceptable for calculating the absorption by sunlight collectors. It is
important to note that the errors in elevation are mainly early and
late in the day. Stationary solar collectors are often pointed due
south and at a tilt approximately equal to the latitude, so absorption
early and late in the day is a small part of the total.
An analemma showing the position of the sun as calculated by
the model at noon Eastern Standard Time (UT -5) from 20 June 2020
to 20 June 2021 is shown in Fig. 5, compared the position of the sun
from the NOAA spreadsheet at the same times. The figure shows
that the characteristic figure-8 of an analemma is due only to the
tilt of the earth's axis. Other phenomena alter the details of the plot
but are not the cause of the shape. While differences between the
azimuths calculated by the model and the NOAA spreadsheet are
very visible on this scale, especially around 27 July 2020 and 15 May
2021, they are only rarely more than 4 . Even on these dates the
differences in calculated elevation at noon are less than 0.5 .
Fig. 6 shows the root mean square difference of the elevation for
each day as calculated by the model relative to the NOAA spreadsheet, from 20 June 2020 to 20 June 2021. Fig. 7 shows the root
mean square difference of the azimuth over the same period. The
minima occur in Fig. 6 on 5 July and 30 December 2020, and in Fig. 7
occur on 5 July 2020 and 2 January 2021. The aphelion in the earth's
orbit was on 4 July 2020 and the perihelion on January 2, 2021. On
these days the earth's motion is parallel to that of the circular
model, so the effect of the eccentricity of the earth's orbit is at its
minimum. The proximity of the minima in the differences to the
dates of the aphelion and perihelion suggest that the primary cause
of the difference in the model is that it does not include the earth's
orbital eccentricity.
4. A simple correction for eccentricity
To correct for the eccentricity of the earth's orbit in a manner
that is consistent with the simplicity of this model, we can replace
ut in equation (4) with ut þ f ðtÞ. Kepler's second law, which is also
the conservation of angular momentum, requires that
uþ
df
A
¼
dt r 2
(13)
for some constant A, where r is the distance from the sun to the
earth. A simple estimate for f ðtÞ is
f ðtÞ ¼ C sin u t tp
(14)
where tp is the time of perihelion. Combining equations (13) and
(14),
2
C
1 1
r2
ra2
¼ 1p
þ r12
rp2
a
1
¼
rp
ra
2
1þ
(15)
rp
ra
where rp is the distance to the sun at perihelion and ra is the distance to the sun at aphelion. The ratio of rp to ra can be written in
terms of the earth's orbital eccentricity as
rp 1 ε
¼
ra 1 þ ε
(16)
So
C¼
Fig. 3. The differences between the elevation calculated by the model and the values
from the NOAA spreadsheet.
2ε
1 þ ε2
(17)
The eccentricity of the earth's orbit is 0.0167. Graphs of the daily
178
F.R. Shapiro
Renewable Energy 184 (2022) 176e181
Fig. 5. Analemma showing the position of the sun at noon Eastern Standard Time (UT -5) 20 June 2020 to 20 June 2021, at the same location as Figs. 2 and 3, as calculated by the
model. The dates of the points are A: 27 July 2020, B: 18 December 2020, C: 15 May 2021, and D: 19 June 2021. The dashed line shows the same values from the NOAA spreadsheet.
Fig. 8. Root mean square error of the elevation of the sun as calculated by the model as
in Fig. 6, but with an approximate correction for the eccentricity of the earth's orbit.
Fig. 6. Root mean square error of the elevation of the sun as calculated by the model
relative to the results in the spreadsheet from the United States National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, for each day from 20 June 2020 to 20 June 2021.
Fig. 7. Root mean square error of the azimuth of the sun as calculated by the model
relative to the results in the spreadsheet from NOAA, for each day from 20 June 2020 to
20 June 2021.
Fig. 9. Root mean square error of the azimuth of the sun as calculated by the model in
Fig. 7, but with an approximate correction for the eccentricity of the earth's orbit.
179
F.R. Shapiro
Renewable Energy 184 (2022) 176e181
6. Conclusions
This work shows the derivation of equations for the elevation and
azimuth angles of the sun in a simple model. The only parameters
are readily available values with clear physical meaning: the date
and time of the nearest northern hemisphere winter solstice, the tilt
of the earth's axis, and the length of a year in the Gregorian calendar.
In the model, the earth's orbit is assumed to be circular, the earth is
assumed to be a perfect sphere, and many other phenomena are
excluded. However, results are generally within a few degrees of a
more accurate calculation in a spreadsheet by NOAA throughout the
year centered at the solstice. The characteristic figure-8 of the
analemma is found even with this simple model.
Most of the difference between the simple model and the NOAA
calculation is due to the eccentricity of the earth's orbit. An
approximate correction for the eccentricity, based on Kepler's
second law, substantially reduces the differences between the
simple model and the NOAA calculation. The only parameters in the
correction are the eccentricity of the earth's orbit and the date and
time of the perihelion nearest to the solstice already used in the
model. The non-spherical shape of the earth, the influence of the
moon, diffraction by the earth's atmosphere, and other phenomena
cause only small variations in sun's elevation and azimuth. The
model is shown to work for trial locations in both the northern and
southern hemispheres.
Fig. 10. Analemma showing the position of the sun at noon Eastern Standard Time (UT
-5) 20 June 2020 to 20 June 2021, as calculated by the model. The dashed line shows
the same values from the NOAA spreadsheet.
root mean square difference from 20 June 2020 to 20 June 2021
with this correction are shown in Figs. 8 and 9, using the perihelion
on 2 January 2021 at 13:50 UT.
The reductions in the difference from Figs. 6e8 and from
Figs. 7e9 are substantial, although there is still some structure. The
root mean square differences in Figs. 8 and 9 are less than the sun's
diameter as viewed from earth, which is approximately 0.5 .
Fig. 10 shows the analemma using the model with the eccentricity correction, and the values for the same times from the NOAA
spreadsheet. The results of the model and the spreadsheet are
almost indistinguishable.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Finley R. Shapiro: Writing e original draft, This work was
written exclusively by the author, who also did all of the work
described. The author benefitted from discussions and comments
from colleagues and the referees, as mentioned in the
acknowledgements.
5. Southern hemisphere
Calculations of the solar position according to the model and the
NOAA spreadsheet were also done for the position Latitude 12
Longitude 77, the approximate location of Lima, Peru. Lima is
south of the equator and north of the Tropic of Capricorn, so at noon
the sun can be north, south, east or west of zenith. In order to see a
Fig. 8 shape similar to those in Figs. 5 and 10, the graph in Fig. 11
shows qZ sin g on the x-axis and qZ cos g on the y-axis. The origin
of the graph represents zenith. The skew to the right is because
local solar noon at Longitude 77 is approximately 8 minutes after
noon for the time zone (UT -5).
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing
financial interests or personal relationships that could have
appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful for helpful suggestions from Gerard F.
Jones, Michael E. Evans, and the anonymous reviewers. This paper
did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the
public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
[1] J.A. Duffie, W.A. Beckman, Solar Energy Thermal Processes, 5th ed., John Wiley
& Sons, also, 1974, 2020.
[2] P.I. Cooper, The absorption of radiation in solar stills, Sol. Energy 12 (1969)
333e346.
[3] A. Goetzberger, A. Zastrow, On the coexistence of solar-energy conversion and
plant cultivation, Int. J. Sol. Energy 1 (1982) 55e69.
[4] C. Dupraz, H. Marrou, G. Talbot, L. Dufour, A. Nogier, Y. Ferard, Combining
solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimizing land use: towards
new agrivoltaic schemes, Renew. Energy 36 (2011) 2725e2732.
[5] E.A. Handoyo, D. Ichsani, Prabowo, The optimal tilt angle of a solar collector,
Energy Procedia 32 (2012) 166e175.
[6] Y. Rizal, S.H. Wibowo, Feriyadi, Application of solar position algorithm for suntracking system, Energy Procedia 32 (2013) 160e165.
[7] M.A. Danandeh, G.S.M. Mousavi, Solar irradiance estimation models and optimum tilt angle approaches: a comparative study, Renew. Sustain. Energy
Rev. 92 (2018) 319e330.
[8] F. Benford, J.E. Bock, A time analysis of sunshine, Trans. Illum. Eng. Soc. 34
(1939) 200e218.
[9] J.C. Seong, Sun position calculator (SPC) for Landsat imagery with geodetic
latitudes, Comput. Geosci. 85 (2015) 68e74.
[10] A.Z. Hafez, A. Soliman, K.A. El-Metwally, I.M. Ismail, Tilt and azimuth angles in
Fig. 11. Modified analemma for Lima, Peru, Latitude 12 Longitude 77. The plot
shows qZ sin g on the x-axis and qZ cos g on the y-axis for the position of the sun at
noon in time zone UT -5, at Latitude 12 S Longitude 77 W, the approximate location of
Lima, Peru. The dates are 20 June 2020 to 20 June 2021. The points are at A: 20 June
2020, B: 1 November 2020, C: 21 December 2020, and D: 13 February 2021.
180
F.R. Shapiro
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
Renewable Energy 184 (2022) 176e181
solar energy applications e a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 77 (2017)
147e168.
J.J. Michalsky, The Astronomical Almanac's algorithm for approximate solar
position (1950-2050), Sol. Energy 40 (1988) 227e235.
R. Walraven, Calculating the position of the sun, Sol. Energy 20 (1978)
393e397.
I. Reda, A. Andreas, Solar position algorithm for solar radiation applications,
Sol. Energy 76 (2004) 577e589.
I. Reda, A. Andreas, Corrigendum to ‘‘Solar position algorithm for solar radiation applications’’ [Solar Energy 76 (2004) 577e589], Sol. Energy 81 (2007)
838.
I. Reda, A. Andreas, Solar Position Algorithm for Solar Radiation Applications,
Technical Report NREL/TP-560-34302, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2008.
[16] P. Armstrong, M. Izygon, An innovative software for analysis of sun position
algorithms, Energy Procedia 49 (2014) 2444e2453.
[17] M. Blanco-Muriel, D.C. Alarcon-Padilla, T. Lopea-Moratalla, M. Lara-Coira,
Computing the solar vector, Sol. Energy 70 (2001) 431e441.
[18] R. Grena, Five new algorithms for the computation of sun position from 2010
to 2110, Sol. Energy 86 (2012) 1323e1337.
[19] J.W. Spencer, Fourier series representation of the position of the sun, Search 2
(1971) 172.
[20] A.B. Sproul, Derivation of the solar geometric relationships using vector
analysis, Renew. Energy 32 (2007) 1187e1205.
[21] W. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Wu, A new method of single celestial-body sun positioning
based on theory of mechanisms, Chin. J. Aeronaut. 29 (2016) 248e256.
[22] NOAA_Solar_Calculations_day.xls.
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/grad/
solcalc/calcdetails.html, 2021.
181
Descargar