WRITING 1 The two tables give information on sales of two types of smartphones in six countries in 2012 and 2022. The six countries evaluated was Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Canada, Ireland and Thailand. The first table shows the iPhone sales in Canadian dollars in millions. In Germany, the iPhones sales climbed from 4.6 millions to 12.4 millions. The second country in the table is Japan, with an increment of sales from 8.9 millions, in 2012, to 21.9 millions in 2022. New Zealand experimented a considerably increment from 1.4 millions to 18 millions. This represents more than ten times more from 2012 to 2022. Next country evaluated is Canada with an increment from 6.8 millions to 41.7 millions. Ireland experimented an slightly grow on sales from 0.8 in 2012 to 3.4 millions in 2022. Last country in the table is Thailand, with a rise from 7.4 millions in 2012 to 29.5 millions in 2022. The second table shows the Galaxy sales in Canadian dollars in millions. Germany is the first country in the table with sales from 3.1 millions to 18.4 millions. Second country is Japan, with 10.8 millions on sales in 2012 to 32.7 millions in 2022. The sales in New Zealand increased from 0.8 millions to 14.2 millions. Canadian sales grew from 4.3 to 29.7 millions. The increment on sales in Ireland went from 0.6 to 4.1 millions and sales in Thailand grew from 8.9 to 24.6 millions. Overall, comparing the data of iPhone and Galaxy, both brands experimented an increment on sales from 2012 to 2022, in the six countries. During 2012, Galaxy generated more sales just in Japan and Thailand, and the iPhone was the most sold smartphone brand in Germany, New Zealand, Canada and Ireland. But in 2022, iPhone was the brand with more sales just in three nations: New Zealand Canada and Thailand. On the other hand, Galaxy generated more sales in Germany, Japan, Ireland, compared with iPhone in the same year. WRITING 2 Access to knowledge is crucial in our times. Each government should ensure free access to the culture, history and science, yet admission costs to museums discourage many people from visiting these locations. Given the foregoing, I agree that museums should not charge admission to allow both locals and visitors to enjoy the specialized knowledge that only these cultural centers can supply. Free admission to museums dedicated to history and culture is critical for individuals to learn their country's origins and evolution. Exhibitions on historical people, maps that explain geographical growth, and articles from each culture may be found in these museums. Natives and foreigners equally might learn to better connect with society by comprehending its essence and exploring development options for future generations. On the other side, free admission to science museums encourages youngsters to become more interested in their surroundings and to develop their minds at a young age. Nature exploration through the senses is emphasized in this kind of museums. The environmental displays stimulate their interest in the environment, while the human exhibits allow kids to learn about how our bodies function. To summarize, while the expense of maintaining museum exhibits is significant, the advantage that the populace receives from the information obtained much outweighs the cost that governments bear. As a result, ensuring government funding and keeping museums free is everyone's responsibility.
