TXOTX: TECHNICAL EXPERTS OVERSEEING THIRD COUNTRY

TXOTX: TECHNICAL EXPERTS
OVERSEEING THIRD COUNTRY
Nombre
| Profesor | Notas
EXPERTISE
INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO PESQUERO
DIVISION DE INVESTIGACION PESQUERA
COOPERATION WORK PROGRAMME 2007
Theme 2.- Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, and
Biotechnology
KBBE-2007-1-2-11.- Improving research in support to
scientific advice to fisheries management outside EU
waters
Juan Carlos Quiroz (jquiroz@ifop.cl)
Investigador Principal – Departamento de Evaluación de Recursos
Instituto de Fomento Pesquero
¿Cómo traspasar
la asesoría
científica al manejo
pesquero?
Cuotas de Capturas
21 Pesquerías Nacionales
CONSORCIO TXOTX
•
AZTI-Tecnalia (AZTI), Spain – Coordinator
•
CEFAS -Centre for Environment Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, UK
•
Imperial College of London (ICL), UK
•
IFOP - Instituto de Fomento Pesquero (IFOP), Chile
•
Stockholm University (SU), Sweden
•
University of Cape Town (UCT), South Africa
•
International Fisheries and Maritime Development Consultancy , Botswana
•
Seychelles Fishing Authority
•
INRH - Institut National de Recherche Halieutique (INRH), Morocco
•
IMS - Institute of Marine Sciences (IMS), Tanzania
•
TAFIRI - Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute (TAFIRI), Tanzania
CONSORCIO TXOTX
Bilateral agreement
other fishing interest
TXOTX partner/contact
PRIMEROS
CONTACTOS
CEPES, 2009
PRIMEROS
CONTACTOS
90 ton. Investigación
24 US$/kg = US$ 2,16 millones
CUOTA 2009 = 3000 ton.
Marzo - Abril 2007
Conversaciones Telefónicas /
emails
Invitación a formar parte de
TXOTX
PRIMEROS
CONTACTOS
Otoño 2007
Universidad St. Andrews
Centre for Research into
Ecological and Environmental
Modelling
•
AZTIAZTI-Tecnalia (AZTI), Spain – Coordinator
•
CEFAS -Centre for Environment Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, UK
•
IFOP - Instituto de Fomento Pesquero (IFOP), Chile
RETOMANDO EL TXOTX
In response to the call from the EU, the TXOXT proposal seeks to develop a network of
scientists from different countries in order to compare and gather information on
data collection, assessment methods and management systems in different
regions with the ultimate aim to improve coordination of research programmes
promoted by different bodies. For that purpose, TXOTX attempts to meet the guiding
principles highlighted by the major documents driving modern management of aquatic
living resources
KBBE-2007-1-2-11.- Improving research in support to scientific advice to fisheries
management outside EU waters
RETOMANDO EL TXOTX
MAIN GOAL
The project will support the development of a network of fisheries research with third
countries, with the aim to improve coordination of research programmes promoted by different
actors (Commission, Members States, Associated States, concerned third countries and
international organisations such as FAO and regional fisheries organisations). The project will
deliver a synopsis of data available and methodologies applied in collection, analysis,
dissemination and management procedures in support to scientific advice to fisheries
management in the concerned regions. It will also establish needs for further research in
order to maintain the basis for a sustainable resource utilisation.
KBBE-2007-1-2-11.- Improving research in support to scientific advice to fisheries
management outside EU waters
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
WP 2 Review of
Management Areas
Abril 2007
Noviembre Enero
2007
2008
Enero
2010
Marzo
Septiembre
2011
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Project Coordinator
Alejandro Anganuzzi (IOTC)
Andrew Rosernberg (UNH)
André Punt (UW)
PEER-REVIEW PANEL
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
Project Coordination Committee
Dr. Hilario Murua
Dr. Hilario Murua
Tecnalia - AZTI
Tecnalia - AZTI
Dr. Graham Pilling
Administrative Assisstant
Cefas
Amaia Barrena
Dr. David Agnew
Tecnalia - AZTI
Imperial
TXOTX CONSORTIUM
WP 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
HISTORIA DEL PAWP
ÍS4 SYNOPSIS
WP 3 ACROSS REGIONS REVIEW
Nombre del
evento 6
1ª fecha
2ª fecha
3ª fecha
Descripción
del evento
Descripción
del evento
Descripción
del evento
4ª fecha
5ª fecha
6ª fecha
Descripción
del evento
Descripción
del evento
Descripción
del evento
Data collection & Analysis
Dissemination
Management procedures
WP 5 DISEMINATION
Interational RFMOs
Third countries Agreement
Nombre del
Nombre del
Nombre del
Nombre del
WP
2
REVIEW
OF
MANAGEMENT
AREAS
evento 2
evento 3
evento 4
evento 5
Tuna RFMOs
Nombre del
evento 1
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
¿Que hemos aprendido?
•
Una diferente orientación en presentar un plan de trabajo
–
Fondo de Investigación Pesquera (concursables)
–
Subsecretaria de Pesca (Proyectos Estratégicos – asignados directamente)
Evaluación se enfoca principalmente en aspectos metodológicos
•
mo
EU – 7
Programa Marco
–
Propuesta Metodológica corresponde a un Annex I - “Description of Work”
–
Grant agreement - Se enfoca en Coordination and Support Actions
•
Igualdad (genero, ética), trasparencia, viabilidad, ciencia, etc.
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
Participación
6% Financiamiento
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
Participación
6% Financiamiento
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
Event
Type of meeting
Dates
Place
Meeting 1
Kick-off Meeting
7-8 April 2008
Pasaia, Basque
Country (Spain)
Meeting 2
Project
Coordination
Committe
4-5 February 2009
Different locations
Meeting 3
Web-based Meeting
5-6 March 2009
Imperial College,
London
•
Objetivos por Paquete de Trabajo
•
Hitos relevantes
•
Difusión
•
Motivación y Participación
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
Por ejemplo: ObjetivosWP2
•
To build a balanced network of fishery researchers
including partners from different regions and areas with
different problematic and experiences, to enlarge the
network to include new members as required, to coordinate
the activities of the network.
•
To ensure the effective organization and supervision of the
development of the project, including its scientific and
funding aspects, close and efficient liaison with the
workpackages (and among them) and timely
communications with the European Commission.
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
Por ejemplo: Metodología WP2
•
•
Collection of information on
–
Methodologies used for collection of data, analysis of data, use of data/assessments, and provision of
management advice
–
Current research programmes, objectives and planning, by various actors
–
Current state of knowledge
Matched against EU commitments
–
EU CFP – sustainable fisheries
–
WSSD – restore stocks to Bmsy by 2015
–
WSSD – implement MPAs by 2012
–
UNFSA – implement ecosystem approach
–
UNGA – regulate high seas bottom fisheries (VMEs)
–
UNGA – eliminate IUU
Bilateral agreement
other fishing interest
TXOTX partner/contact
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
¿Que hemos aprendido?
El seguimiento del proyecto se fundamenta en:
CHILE
EU
Envió de Reporte
Ejecución de reuniones
Escrutinios de metodología
Cumplimientos actividades
En algunos casos difusión
Difusión **
Taller de Resultados
Peer Review Panel
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
PROPUESTA – PUESTA EN MARCHA –
EJECUCIÓN
Interviewee:
Date:
Country:
Place (i.e. name of the organisation):
Name of the interviewee:
Position in the organisation:
Contents:
I.
TO BE COMPLETED BY INTERVIEWER PRIOR TO COUNTRY VISIT AND CHECKED WITH INTERVIEWEE . 3
1.
II.
2.
DESCRIPTION OF FISHERIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 3
TO BE COMPLETED DURING THE INTERVIEW ............................................................................................................. 7
FISHERY AGREEMENT - F ISHERIES PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS .................................................................................................... 7
2.1.
Change of targeted species in the agreement ........................................................................................................................ 7
2.2.
Transparency and policy dialogue ........................................................................................................................................ 7
2.3.
Contribution towards rational and sustainable exploitation ................................................................................................. 8
2.4.
Financial contribution........................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.5.
Countries without FA or FPA ............................................................................................................................................. 10
3. NON-EU FISHING AGREEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................... 10
4. MORATORIUM OR PROTECTED, ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES (PETS) ....................................................................... 10
5. RESEARCH COLLABORATION AND RESEARCH COORDINATION...................................................................................................... 10
6. DATA COLLECTION....................................................................................................................................................................... 13
6.1.
Biological data collection ................................................................................................................................................... 13
6.2.
Environmental data collection ............................................................................................................................................ 24
6.3.
Data collection on ecosystem effects ................................................................................................................................... 26
6.4.
Data collection on socio-economic aspects......................................................................................................................... 32
6.5.
Funding ............................................................................................................................................................................... 35
7. DATA UTILISATION, RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................... 36
7.1.
Data utilisation .................................................................................................................................................................... 36
7.2.
Research .............................................................................................................................................................................. 37
7.3.
Research funding ................................................................................................................................................................. 42
7.4.
Assessment methods, assessment models and software ....................................................................................................... 43
7.5.
Assessment funding ............................................................................................................................................................. 45
7.6.
Stock status and exploitation level ...................................................................................................................................... 45
8. DISSEMINATION OF SCIENTIFIC RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 46
9. MANAGEMENT PROCESSES ........................................................................................................................................................... 49
10.
FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES ........................................................................................................................................................... 56
11.
FOR STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................................................................................................ 57
12.
FOR FISHING ADMINISTRATIONS ............................................................................................................................................... 57
¿POR QUÉ TXOTX?
En las sidrerías (sagardotegia en euskera) tradicionalmente las kupelas de
sidra se disponen alrededor del comedor, y el dueño de la sidrería va abriendo
kupelas a lo largo de la noche al grito de “TXOTX!"
txotx
MUCHÍSIMAS GRACIAS