138 chapter 3 waste Chapter 3 Waste 1] Background 139 2] Pressure: Waste generation 140 3] Response to the Waste Generation Pressure 156 [ HIERARCHICAL WASTE STRATEGY ] A Prevention B Reuse C Recicling A Actions or measures aimed at avoiding or reducing waste generation, diminishing the presence of hazardous material or of the pollutants in them, and minimizing the significant impacts that these might generate on the environment or people’s health. D Energy Valorization C Valorization actions through which wastes are transformed into new products, excluding energy valorization. D Use of a residue as fuel in a production process. B Action consisting on the use of a material or product previously utilized as an input in the production process that originated it. E Disposal Actions aimed at a final waste disposal in places authorized for this purpose complyeing with current regulations. 139 Introduction Abstract Even though waste generation is inherent to any social organization, it gains more relevance with the appearence of major human settlements, requiring an adequate management in order to avoid negative impacts on health and the environment. Background 1 In nature there are no wastes, everything is reincorporated into the cycle through trophic chains and biochemical cycles, only ecosystems with anthropic presence generate waste. Wastes are substances or objects that are discarded once they reach the end of their useful lives and are then treated through valorization or elimination. The main environmental impacts that final waste disposal (adapted from IDB, 2009) may generate include the following: Effects on water quality and alteration of the hydraulic characteristics, on both surface and underground water; Change in biomass quantity, type of vegetation and fauna; Change in the physical, chemical and fertility properties of soil (e.g., pollution by oils, fats, heavy metals, and acids, among other residues, and activation of erosion by changes in topography); Atmospheric emissions of dioxins and furans, hydrogen sulfide, among others; Emission of greenhouse gases, such as methane and carbon dioxide, as a result of anaerobic biodegradation processes in sanitary landfills; Diseases caused by sanitary vectors, whose appearance and permanence waste chapter 3 140 chapter 3 waste 1995 can be directly related to the inadequate execution of one of the stages of waste management; 100% Landfills and Dumps Landscape impacts; Risk of accidents, such as explosions or cave-ins; Mental and mood deterioration of people directly affected due to the proximity of the waste; 2005 40% 60% Landfills and Dumps Sanitary Landfills 1] Sanitary Landfill: Place set aside for the final disposal of waste, which complies with the current regulation (Sanitary Authorization, according to S.D. N° 189, in addition to the Environmental Qualification Resolution). Landfill: Place set aside for the final disposal of waste that does not comply with the current regulation, but has Sanitary Authorization according to Resolution N° 2.444. Garbage Dump and Municipal or Urban Landfill: place set aside for the final disposal of waste that does not comply with the regulation in force and does not have a Sanitary Authorization, according to Resolution N° 2.444. Bad smell; Acoustic pollution derived from waste transportation. Although this is a complex matter, Chile has made significant improvements in this area. In 1995, all residential waste was disposed of in landfills and dumps; however, by 2005 more than 60 percent of waste was disposed of in sanitary landfills that comply with a series of sanitary and environmental technical requirements1 (CONAMA, 2005, p.12). Despite this progress, it is necessary to improve current environmental and sanitary regulations, address existing legal loopholes, enhance inspection, and develop public institutional capacity to coordinate all of the stakeholders with competence in waste management. However, it is worth noting that waste management has been approached mainly in a reactive manner, thus limiting it only to collection and final disposal, without further attention to other valorization alternatives. Pressure: 2 Waste Generation Waste generation at the national level In Chile, for decades, waste management has been approached as a concern in different social sectors, but with no effective solutions. The complexity of this issue still confronts us, also, to production and consumption patterns that favor an increasing waste generation. Among the main causes are the following: 141 waste chapter 3 The process of population growth, distribution and concentration; The physical characteristics of the country and the distribution of the economic activities, that result in the presence of many sites located far away from populated areas that make inspection difficult and facilitate the creation of illegal garbage dumps; An increased consumption as a result of higher incomes; The existence of institutional, regulatory, inspection, and management deficiencies. Information on the generation and management of wastes in the country is limited. Different studies have been carried out on waste generation by origin and destination which, in most cases, correspond to registries of final disposal sites. The study "Collection, Analysis, Generation and Publication of National Information on Solid Wastes in Chile" was carried out between 2009 and 2010. Based on the revision of previous studies and surveys to municipalities and companies that generate and receive wastes, the results of the study show the following estimates for 2009; a generation of 16.9 million tons of waste, from which 6.5 million tons are municipal waste and 10.4 million tons are industrial waste. This data does not include massive mining wastes2. However, it is important to point out that this study was performed on the basis of surveys and estimates, therefore, the information on some topics is incomplete and imprecise. Municipal Waste Generation Residential waste management, understood as collection, transportation and disposal, is a service that is operated by each municipality. This activity, even though it is regulated and supervised by the State, requires additional standards to address waste management as a whole. There are two factors that have significant influence on residential waste generation: the number of inhabitants and their income level. The number of inhabitants is the key factor on which the total municipal waste generation depends. At an individual level, income is the variable that most affects per capita waste generation. Figure 1 shows how the Metropolitan Region, where almost 50 percent of the nation's population is concentrated, generates the highest amount of municipal waste with a participation of 43 percent, followed by the Biobío Region with 10 percent and the Valparaíso Region with 7.4 percent. 16.9 million 6.5 10.4 municipal waste industrial waste million million 2] This report does not incluide information about massive mining wastes, because not data were available about it 142 Arica and Parinacota chapter 3 waste Municipal waste generation per region, 2009. 114,489 Tarapacá fig. 189,806 1 Antofagasta 196,289 Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010a. 103,433 Atacama 220,860 Coquimbo 483,739 Valparaíso 2,807,247 Metropolitan Libertador Gral. B. O’Higgins Maule 343,694 Biobío 359,862 Araucanía Los Ríos 645,875 Los Lagos 425,234 147,563 Aysén del Gral. Carlos Ibañez 369,925 44,918 Magallanes and Chilean Antarctica 50,000 tons/year 64,669 "The maps published in this report that refer to or are related to limits or boundaries of Chile do not commit the State of Chile in any way, according to Article 2, letter g of the Decree with Force of Law N° 83 of 1979 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Cartographic information is based on Datum WGS84 and it is mearly referential". 100,000 tons/year 143 residuos capítulo 3 143 waste chapter 3 144 chapter 3 waste At the local level, the influence of the number of inhabitants and their income level can be more clearly appreciated. Figures 2 and 3 present the total generation of municipal waste, population, and per capita generation of the communes of the Metropolitan Region. The most populated commune of the Region is Puente Alto, which also corresponds to the one with the highest total waste generation. Municipal waste generation per communes in the Metropolitan Region, 2009. Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010a. fig. 2 Puente Alto Maipú La Florida San Bernardo Las Condes Pudahuel Peñalolén Quilicura Santiago El Bosque Providencia Recoleta Renca Vitacura Ñuñoa Estación Central Cerro Navia La Pintana Lo Barnechea La Granja Quinta Normal Macul Conchalí Pedro Aguirre Cerda La Reina Lo Espejo San Miguel Melipilla La Cisterna Lo Prado Huechuraba Cerrillos Colina San Ramón Independencia Penaflor San Joaquín Talagante Lampa Buin Padre Hurtado Paine Isla de Maipo El Monte Calera de Tango Tiltil Pirque San José de Maipo Curacaví María Pinto San Pedro Alhué 284,934 tons Puente Alto 45,664 tons Pedro Aguirre Cerda 1,909 tons Alhué Tons 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 145 waste chapter 3 At the same time, the commune of Vitacura has the highest rate of per capita waste generation. Figure 4 shows a national geographical projection of the average income per inhabitant and of the per capita residential waste generation per inhabitant, respectively, up to 2009. fig. Puente Alto Maipú La Florida San Bernardo Las Condes Pudahuel Peñalolén Quilicura Santiago El Bosque Providencia Recoleta Renca Vitacura Ñuñoa Estación Central Cerro Navia La Pintana Lo Barnechea La Granja Quinta Normal Macul Conchalí Pedro Aguirre Cerda La Reina Lo Espejo San Miguel Melipilla La Cisterna Lo Prado Huechuraba Cerrillos Colina San Ramón Independencia Penaflor San Joaquín Talagante Lampa Buin Padre Hurtado Paine Isla de Maipo El Monte Calera de Tango Tiltil Pirque San José de Maipo Curacaví María Pinto San Pedro Alhué 3 Per capita waste generation by communes of the Metropolitan Region, 2009. Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010a. 2.09 kg/day/inhab Vitacura 0.54 kg/day/inhab Curacaví kg/day/inhab 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 146 chapter 3 waste N N Average per capita income ($) Waste Generation (ton/year) 75,000 - 170,000 30 - 28,000 170,001 - 280,000 28,001 - 79,000 280,001 - 550,000 79,001 - 161,000 550,001 - 1,500,000 161,001 - 285,000 No information Average per capita income and municpal waste generation, 2009. fig. Note: It is important to note that the data was obtained from surveys and estimates, therefore information is incomplete and imprecise. 4 Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010 and the CASEN 2009 survey, MIDEPLAN. "The maps published in this report that refer to or are related to limits or boundaries of Chile do not commit the State of Chile in any way, according to Article 2, letter g of the Decree with Force of Law N° 83 of 1979 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Cartographic information is based on Datum WGS84 and it is mearly referential". 0 250 500 km 0 250 500 km 147 waste chapter 3 Currently, most municipalities limit their management to final waste disposal on their own or through contracts with private companies. In general, such organizations have not shown a real willingness to manage their waste issues as a whole and they usually try to eliminate them without considering strategies such as promoting the prevention of their generation or their potential valorization. Likewise, contracts for final disposal usually discourage recycling initiatives, due to the fact that the costs per ton diminish as the amount disposed increases. Despite this fact, some municipalities have formalized recycling through contracts for differentiated collection. Moreover, there is an informal market of recyclers and intermediaries for paper and cardboard, junk and other recyclable waste collection, and there is also a formal market with companies that recover paper and cardboard, junk, plastic, and tinplate, in the main cities of the country. Figure 5 shows that more than 50 percent of municipal waste generated in the country could be valued, which would substantially reduce the waste sent to final disposal sites, and thus lower the costs invested by municipalities on this item. 3% 3% 7% 7% 10% 48% 11% 11% Metals Fabrics Bulk Glass Paper, cardboard and paper products Other Plastics Organic matter fig. 5 Composition of Municipal Waste Generation, 2009. Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010a. 148 chapter 3 waste In terms of final waste disposal sites where municipal solid wastes are deposited, it is estimated that 69 percent were dumped in sanitary landfills, which are facilities that comply with current regulations, 22 percent in landfills, which are facilities that comply with the regulation dating from 1980, and 9 percent in garbage dumps, which are facilities that do not comply with any type of regulations. These are located mainly in rural areas and municipalities with a low number of inhabitants. To better illustrate this problem, the regions of the country with a complete registry of waste disposal sites were identified. With this information, maps were developed to include, for every commune, final waste disposal sites and per capita income, obtained from the CASEN survey carried out by MIDEPLAN in 2009 (Figure 6). The Metropolitan Region of Santiago currently has three sanitary landfills: Loma los Colorados (Til Til), Santiago Poniente (Maipú) and Santa Marta (San Bernardo), which cover the needs of most of the communes of the region. Figure 6 shows that the communes with the highest incomes do not have final waste disposal sites, exporting their waste to other communes. It also reveals that in some communes, such as Puente Alto, there are still many small illegal garbage dumps. Per capita income and final waste disposal sites for the Metropolitan Region, 2009. Note: Illegal landfills and small garbage dumps in the Metropolitan Region are not authorized. fig. 6 Source: MIDEPLAN, CASEN Survey, 2009. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Catastro de Sitios de Disposición Final de Residuos, 2009. Colina ## ### ### ## # # Lo Barnechea Quilicura Huechuraba # Vitacura # ## # ### # # # Las Condes Pudahuel ## ## ### La Reina Santiago # # # Peñalolen María Pinto Maipú # # # # La Florida Padre # # Hurtado ## # Puente # # Calera # de Tango # # Alto # # Peñaflor # San # ## Bernardo # El Monte Talagante # # # San José de Maipo # Pirque Buin Isla de Maipo Curacaví Type of waste disposal Garbage Dump Sanitary Landfill Landfill Illegal Landfill and small garbage dumps Average Per Capita Income ($) 75,000-170,000 170,001-280,000 280,001-550,000 550,001-1,500,000 Tiltil Melipilla # Paine San Pedro Alhué "The maps published in this report that refer to or are related to limits or boundaries of Chile do not commit the State of Chile in any way, according to Article 2, letter g of the Decree with Force of Law N° 83 of 1979 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Cartographic information is based on Datum WGS84 and it is mearly referential". 0 25 Km 50 149 waste chapter 3 Final disposal in sanitary landfills presents significant economies of scale and, thus, regulation discourages having more disposal sites from an economic point of view. However, it is important to note that since 2006 there has been little progress in the improvement of final waste disposal in sanitary landfills. Illegal landfills and small garbage dumps are mostly located in peripheral urban areas, mainly affecting low-income communes and generating a negative impact on their budgets; forcing them to allocate economic resources, equipment and staff to classify, extract, transport, and remove waste that has been illegally disposed of in public spaces. In some cases, this coincides with the lack of spaces available to devlop outdoor entertainment activities, a situation that damages the quality of life of their inhabitants. fig. 7 fig. 8 Small dump on a river bank. Photograph by Víctor Rojas, 2011. Small dumps in the commune of Puente Alto Source: Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Quick Bird Image, 2008. chapter 3 waste 150 Promoting a higher waste valorization, without disregarding sanitary aspects, would allow a reduction in the demand for final waste disposal sites. Figure 9 shows the Araucania Region, which has communes with lower urban density and of more rural characteristics. The per capita income observed is homogeneous and there are final waste disposal sites in almost all the communes of the region. Three of these sites are sanitary landfills: Villarrica Private Sanitary Landfill (Villarrica), Coipué Sanitary Landfill (Freire) and Nueva Imperial Private Sanitary Landfill (Nueva Imperial). Per capita income and final waste disposal sites in the Araucanía Region, 2009. fig. 9 Source: MIDEPLAN, CASEN Survey, 2009. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Catastro de Sitios de Disposición Final de Residuos, 2009. Renaico Angol Los Sauces Purén Collipulli Ercilla Victoria Traiguén Lumaco Curacautín Perquenco Galvarino Type of waste disposal Garbage dump Landfill Sanitary Landfill Average per capita income ($) 75,000-170,000 170,001-280,000 280,001-550,000 550,001-1,500,000 No information Carahue Lautaro Cholchol Lonquimay Temuco Vilcún Melipeuco Nueva Imperial Saavedra Padre las Casas Freire Teodoro Schmidt Pitrufquén Gorbea Toltén Loncoche "The maps published in this report that refer to or are related to limits or boundaries of Chile do not commit the State of Chile in any way, according to Article 2, letter g of the Decree with Force of Law N° 83 of 1979 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Cartographic information is based on Datum WGS84 and it is mearly referential". Tipo disposición de residuos Basural Cunco Relleno sanitario Vertedero Ingreso promedio per cápita ($) 75.000-170.000Pucón 170.001-280.000 Cu rarrehue Villarica 280.001-550.000 550.001-1.500.000 0 25 Km 50 151 waste chapter 3 Figure 10 illustrates the case of Los Lagos Region, which only has landfills and dumps in the main populated areas. Garbage dumps do not seem concentrated in just one particular commune. San Pablo San Juan de la Costa fig. San Pablo San Juan de la Costa Osorno 10 Osorno Puyehue Río Negro Source: MIDEPLAN, CASEN Survey, 2009. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Catastro de Sitios de Disposición Final de Residuos, 2009. Puyehue Río Negro Puerto Octay Per capita income and final waste disposal sites for Los Lagos Region, 2009. Puerto Octay Purranque Purranque Frutillar Frutillar Fresia Puerto Varas LlanquihueFresia Puerto Varas Llanquihue Los Muermos Puerto Montt Los Muermos Puerto Montt Maullín Cochamó Maullín Cochamó Ancud Ancud Dalcahue Hualaihué Dalcahue Hualaihué Castro Castro Chonchi Type of waste disposal Garbage dump Landfill Sanitary Landfill Average per capita income ($) 75,000-170,000 170,001-280,000 280,001-550,000 550,001-1,500,000 No information Chonchi Futalelfú Quellón Futalelfú Chaitén Quellón Chaitén Palena Palena 0 25 Km 100 50 0 25 50 Km 100 "The maps published in this report that refer to or are related to limits or boundaries of Chile do not commit the State of Chile in any way, according to Article 2, letter g of the Decree with Force of Law N° 83 of 1979 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Cartographic information is based on Datum WGS84 and it is mearly referential". 152 chapter 3 waste Industrial Waste Generation Information on industrial waste is even more limited. Although there are estimates on industrial, hospital, mining, construction, and sylvo-agriculturallivestock waste generation, according to which in 2009 they represented 61.5 percent of the total national waste, information regarding their current management is still insufficient. One exception is the generation and management of radioactive waste, which is regulated and inspected by the Chilean Commission of Nuclear Energy3. However, because the scarce information available is incomplete or broadly estimated, it is not possible to break down industrial waste generation by region. Figure 11 shows an overview in terms of this type of waste distribution at a national level, which does not include massive mining waste. It is important to note that this data has been obtained mostly from surveys, and that it has not been validated with the respective sectors. 3] Another case is that of manufacturers and importers of pesticides, who are at a stage of promoting the triple rinse of their containers, to later proceed with their elimination, thus avoiding their illegal disposal in rural areas. National Industrial Waste Generation per Sector, 2009. Note: Construction waste includes excavation. Industrial waste information is outdated, incomplete or broadly estimated. Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010. fig. 11 1% Water Treatment and Distribution 4% Energy Production 6% Mining and Quarries 56% 15% Construction 18% Manufacturing Industry Agriculture and Forestry 153 waste chapter 3 Hazardous Waste Generation Before the entry into force of the regulation (Supreme Decree N° 148 of Ministry of Health) on hazardous waste management, dated from 2005, the estimate on the generation of this type of waste was of approximately 30,000 tons, mainly due to the lack of specific regulations. The Organisation for the Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recommended in its 2005 Environmental Performance Review of Chile to: "Strengthen chemical and hazardous waste management according to international agreements, notably the Stockholm, Rotterdam and Basel Conventions; complete and implement national plans for persistent organic pollutants and hazardous waste; strengthen enforcement activities, develop pollutant release and transfer registers and improve the regulatory framework to better manage chemicals throughout their life cycle" (Recommendation 49). According to this recommendation, the above mentioned regulation established a definition for hazardous waste and created a declaration and follow-up system for large waste generators (one or more kilograms per month for acute hazardous waste, and 1 or more tons per month for other hazardous wastes). The Hazardous Waste Declaration and Follow-up System (SIDREP, by its acronym in Spanish) has been implemented since 2006. The data obtained from the SIDREP shows a continuous increase in waste declarations up to a total of 422,800 tons per year in 2010, as shown in Figure 12. Tons/year 450,000 fig. 400,000 12 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year Annual Generation of Declared Hazardous Waste Source: SIDREP 2011 154 chapter 3 waste Figures 13 and 14 illustrate the generation of hazardous waste by sectors, composition and generation by regions, respectively. In the SIDREP, there are 72 facilities for disposal and/or valorization of hazardous waste, which during 2010 managed the declared waste. However, the total amount received is even higher since there are still hazardous wastes being declared in paper and this information has not been digitalized yet. National Generation of Hazardous Waste, 2009. Source: RETC, 2011 D fig. 13 2% Transportation, storage and communications Mix of different waste 3% Electricity, gas and water supply 123,894 Mix of various residues 46,438 Residues containing hexavalent chromium compounds 39,639 Acid solutions or solid acid 35,671 Residues with arsenic compounds Mineral oils unfit for their originally intended use 21,964 Residues from waste disposal or treatment operations 21,518 12,645 Waste oils/water, hydrocarbons/water mixtures, emulsions 9,942 Waste chemical substances arising from research and development which are not identified and/or are new 8,603 Waste resulting from surface treatment of metals and plastics Tarry residues resulting from refining 4,041 Lead Residues 3,747 Basic solutions or bases in solid form 3,157 Contaminated soils or materials 3,099 Contaminated packages and containers 2,667 Wastes from resin production, preparation and use 2,638 Residuos with cooper compounds 842 615 Residues from ink production, preparation and use 0 fig. 40,000 14 Hazardous Waste Composition , 2009. Source: MMA, 2011. 80,000 120,000 Tons 155 waste chapter 3 Figure 15 shows that the main destination of hazardous waste during 2010 was the Metropolitan Region, with a total registry of 204,032 tons, followed by the Antofagasta Region, with a total of approximately 135,000 tons. 34% 52% 1% Exploitation of mines and quarries Manufacturing industries Wholesale and retail trade 8% Others Arica y Parinacota Tarapacá Antofagasta fig. Atacama 15 Regional Origin and Destination of Hazardous Waste, 2010. Source: SIDREP, 2011 Coquimbo Valparaíso Metropolitana Libertador Gral. Bernardo O'Higgins Maule Bío-Bío Disposal Araucania Generation Los Rios Los Lagos Aisén y Gral. Carlos Ibáñez del Campo Magallanes 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 Tons/year 200,000 250,000 156 3 chapter 3 waste Response to Waste Generation Pressure In Chile, the regulatory framework associated to waste dates back to 1967, with the publication in the Legal Gazette of the Sanitary Code, which regulates specific aspects regarding hygiene and safety of the environment and the workplace. Relevant laws and decrees are listed in Table 1. The emphasis of waste management has historically been placed on properly solving its final disposal. However, it has become evident that it is not enough to concentrate efforts on solving the final disponsal issue with sanitary and environmental adequacy and it is necessary to redefine the waste management approach in our country. In order to address the complexity of this problem, in 2005 the Directive Council of the National Commission for the Environment, approved the Policy for Integrated Management of Solid Waste, prepared by a Technical Committee with representatives of the Ministry General Secretariat of the Presidency, the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Economy, Undersecretariat of Regional and Administrative Development, and the National Commission for the Environment. This policy has the objective of "achieving that the management of solid waste is performed with a minimum risk for the population's health and the environment, triggering an integrated view of waste, that ensures a sustainable and efficient development of the sector". Executive secretariats were created to implement this Policy, both at a national and regional level. One of the relevant aspects included in this policy is the need to have integrated waste management that covers all of the stages of a product, from its elaboration to its disposal. This model, generally used in developed countries, has proven its effectiveness through time. 157 Table 1 Laws and Decrees Related to Solid Waste Management Entry into Force Laws and Decrees 1967 Decree with Force of Law (D.F.L.) N° 725, of the Ministry of Health, that establishes the Sanitary Code. 1992 Supreme Decree (SD) N° 685 in which Chile ratifies the Basel Convention that regulates transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and stipulates the obligations of the Parties to ensure the environmentally sound management of them, particularly their disposal. 1994 Law N° 19.300 Environmental Framework Law, which incorporates the topic of waste in the Environmental Impact Assessment System, article 10, (letters i and o). 2000 SD N° 594 of the MINSAL on basic sanitary and environmental conditions in the workplace (derived from SD N° 745 from 1993). 2004 SD N°148 of the MINSAL, which establishes the Sanitary Regulation on Hazardous Waste Management. 2007 SD N° 45, of MINSEGPRES, which establishes the emission standard for incineration and co-incineration. 2008 SD N°189 of MINSAL, which regulates basic sanitary and safety conditions in sanitary landfills. 2009 SD N° 6 of MINSAL, on the management of waste generated in healthcare facilities. 2009 SD N° 4 of MINSEGPRES, for the management of sludge generated in wastewater treatment plants. 2010 Law N° 19.300 Environmental Framework Law modified by Law N° 20.417, which establishes the Role of the Ministry of the Environment in proposing policies and creating regulations, plans and programs related to waste (article 70 letter g). waste chapter 3 158 chapter 3 waste In terms of waste management, the first objective is to avoid its generation; if this is not possible, efforts must concentrate on minimizing it; and, if this is not possible, only then potential final disposal must be assessed. This sequence in waste management is known as hierarchy and is illustrated in Figure 16. The hierarchy considers the following stages: π Prevention: Actions or measures aimed at avoiding or reducing waste generation, diminishing the presence of hazardous material or of the pollutants in them, and minimizing the significant impacts that these generate on the environment or human health. π Reuse: Action consisting of the use of a material or product previously utilized as an input in the production process that originated it. π Recycling: Valorization actions through which wastes are transformed into new products, excluding energy valorization. Prevention Reuse Hierarchichal Waste Strategy Source: Adapted from Hertfordshire Waste Partnership, 2007 fig. 16 Recycling Energy Valorization Disposal 159 waste chapter 3 π Energy valorization: Use of a residue as fuel in a production process. π Disposal: Actions aimed at a final waste disposal in places authorized for this purpose that comply with current regulations. Annual follow up on valorization and elimination programs allows monitoring to see if there are reductions in the amounts disposed of, favoring valorization. Figure 17 shows the trend to recover wastes for valorization and disposal, respectively, during the 2007-2009 period, while Figure 18 reports on the distribution of recovered and valorized wastes among different options. Recycling 43% Municipal Waste Collected at a National Level and Destination, 2007-2009. Composting 52% fig. 17 18 7 Vermiculture 4% 6 Other 1% Million tons 5 4 Recovery - Other Recovery - Vermiculture Recovery - Recicling Recovery - Composting Disposal - Garbage Dumps Disposal - Sanitary Landfills and Landfills 3 2 1 0 2007 2008 Year 2009 Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010. Recovery of Municipal Waste, 2009. Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010. 160 4] Valorization is understood as actions aimed at recovering residues or one of their components, with the purpose of reincorporating them into production processes and/or generating new materials, products or energy. chapter 3 waste Since it is not mandatory for all regions to declare waste flows and management to authorities, the valorization figures of the main waste fractions, such as paper and cardboard, scrap and glass, among others, were estimated based on information provided by the main companies dedicated to the valorization of industrial and/or municipal waste, as shown in Figure 19. One of the pending challenges is enhancing the adequate valorization4 of generated waste. It is estimated that the valorization rate of waste generated in Chile is still incipient, close to 10 percent (CONAMA, 2010a). However, the development of markets for valorization of wastes such as paper and cardboard, glass, plastic and metals, has experienced an important growth during recent years. Some experiences have been implemented at a local level, encouraging citizen participation and commitment for waste valorization. For example, there are outstanding initiatives in the municipalities of La Pintana, La Reina, Ñuñoa, Peñalolén, Viña del Mar, Talcahuano, Las Condes and Vitacura, among others. Type of Waste Ferrous metals Source: Own elaboration, based on the "Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile", CONAMA, 2010a. Percentage Valorized (%) 286,000 82% 74,000 54% Papers and Cardboards 913,000 41% fig. Aluminum 10,000 40% 19 Glass 266,000 29% Organics 3,008,000 10% Plastics 668,000 4% Other non-ferrous metals 64,000 3% Tetrapak 18,000 2% Mineral and synthetic oils National Generation and Valorization by Type of Industrial and Municipal Waste, 2009 Amount Generated (million tons) 161 residuos capítulo 3 161 waste chapter 3 Modifying the vision towards an integrated approach to waste, without disregarding sanitary aspects, will allow us to reduce the demand for final disposal sites, particularly for those with no environmental standards or regulations. 162 5) Recommendation 3 Review the scope for introducing new economic instruments (e.g. product charges on hazardous waste, air emission charges, water pollution charges) and improve trading mechanisms. Recommendation 4 Further apply the polluter pays and user pays principles through appropriate charges (e.g. on waste management, for access to protected areas, for natural resources), with due regard to social constraints. chapter 3 waste The OECD, in its 2005 Environmental Performance Review for Chile, also establishes a series of recommendations5 to promote waste valorization such as: "Further the application of 'the polluter pays' and 'user pays' principles through appropriate charges on waste management" and "review the scope for introducing new economic instruments such as charges on hazardous waste, among others" (Recommendations 3 and 4). The Ministry of the Environment is currently working on a draft bill for waste management that includes a new instrument, called Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). The EPR implies that a producer, manufacturer or importer must take responsibility for the product, once its life cycle is over. This concept, developed in Europe in the 90s, is especially applicable to mass consumption products such as oils, tires, computing equipment, batteries, containers and packaging, lamps, and electric devices. The positive results obtained with this policy have resulted in its application to a greater number of products. By transferring the responsibility of managing waste derived from products from the municipality to the producer, the latter must consider the costs for its management in its market price. Therefore, the producer is motivated to consider improvements in the product design regarding, for example, its life cycle, the presence of hazardous substances, and its disassembly, in order to facilitate its valorization. On the other hand, when considering the costs for the management of the product at the end of its life cycle in the sale price, the principle of "the polluter pays" is then being put into practice. In 2009, pilot EPR projects were started in Chile with four selected products: Disused tires, used lubricant oils, electronic devices (computing equipment and cellular phones), and lead-acid batteries. Besides the need to change the approach in waste management, a process of continuous improvement for waste disposal sites must also be sought. In this regard, the Undersecretariat of Regional and Administrative Development (SUBDERE) of the Ministry of Interior started the National Solid Waste Program in 2007, whose objective is to improve the sanitary conditions and environmental quality of urban and rural areas, as well as to implement integrated and sustainable systems for the efficient management of Domestic Solid Residues (DSR). Among the actions included in this program are the construction of new sanitary landfills, purchase of machinery and equipment for their operations, landfill closure, training and assessment for municipal technical departments, improvement of the regional planning capacity for residential solid waste management, stregthening of the inspection capacity, State sanitary and environmental control, among others. Table 2 shows the progress of the Program up to 2011. 163 National Solid Waste Program at a Regional Level, 2011 Minimization Projects 2 1 1 1 Tarapacá 2 Antofagasta 1 1 1 1 Approved plans Regional plans under development 1 Landfills under construction 1 Management Plans Communal plans 1 Landfill Construction Designed landfills Arica and Parinacota Closed landfills Region Assessment studies of closure plans Landfill Closure Studies Table 2 waste chapter 3 Atacama 5 Coquimbo 3 Valparaíso 1 Metropolitan 1 O´Higgins 1 El Maule 2 Biobío 16 Araucanía 15 11 2 Los Ríos 4 2 1 3 Los Lagos 11 10 2 2 Aysén 1 1 1 1 3 7 1 1 1 1 9 1 2 3 2 1 1 61 Source: SUBDERE, 2011 3 9 Magallanes Total 1 1 29 7 4 13 1 6 2 32 164 6] The Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR) is a public access database, aimed at recording, gathering, systematizing, preserving and disseminating information on emissions and waste that are potentially hazardous fo health and the environment that are released into the environment, generated through industrial or non-industrial activities or transferred for their valorization or disposal. The information on releases, waste and/or transfer of pollutants, will be provided by the different sources or institutions forced to report this data to the responsible State agency, through the One-Stop-Shop System. The registry must also include the estimation of releases and wastes of those pollutants that are not included in the current regulation, in the case of releases from diffuse sources, or that are estimated because they are part of international agreements signed by Chile. Estimates will be made by the Ministry of the Environment, with the information provided by the different State agencies. chapter 3 waste On the other hand, to achieve an adequate waste management it is necessary to revise, update and complement the scarce and dispersed information available. It is essential to improve data on the amount and characteristics of generated waste, its generation sources, and current management, considering all stages, from generation to valorization or disposal, passing through its collection, storage, transportation and pre-treatment. Besides the country's needs for information, there are also the commitments with the OECD, an organization that requires that the information be in-sync to that available from other member countries. At the same time, Chile must meet, within previously set deadlines, a series of requirements from this organization regarding definitions, regulations, transboundary waste movements, among others. The Ministry of the Environment has made efforts to record municipal waste generation. The initiatives that have already been executed until now are listed in Table 3. The Ministry of the Environment is in the process of developing the National System of Waste Declaration (SINADER by its acronym in Spanish), with the objective of integrating the declaration of wastes in a single platform, which will be implemented through the Regulation of the Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (PRTR).6 Table 3 Municipal Waste Registries Years Product 2000 – 2006 The Ministry (CONAMA) prepared an annual registry of domestic solid residues, based on the information provided by the municipalities and the Regional Ministerial Health Secretariats (Health Services). The information was restricted to deposited waste and there was a lack of information from several municipalities and final disposal facilities. At the same time, the data was not validated, except for the Metropolitan Region. 2007 – 2008 Revision of the data in the registry of domestic solid residues, completion with data missing from municipalities and final disposal facilities, generation and final disposal factors were also applied. 2009 – 2010 The study "Gathering, Analysis, Generation and Publication of National Information on Solid Wastes in Chile" was carried out. This included the revision of previous studies as well as sending surveys to municipalities, to companies that generate waste and to waste receptors. The main findings of this study were presented in the Report on Solid Waste Management in Chile, released in 2010. 165 References Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente (CONAMA), 2005. Política integrada de gestión de residuos sólidos. Santiago, Chile. Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente (CONAMA), 2009. Inventario nacional de fuentes de emisión de dioxinas y furanos. Santiago, Chile. Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente (CONAMA), 2010a. Primer reporte sobre manejo de residuos sólidos en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Conama. Comisión Nacional del Medio Ambiente (CONAMA), 2010b. Levantamiento, análisis, generación y publicación de información nacional sobre residuos sólidos de Chile. Santiago, Chile: Conama. Hertfordshire Waste Partnership, 2007. Hertfordshire municipal waste management strategy: draft core strategy. Available at: http://www. wasteaware.org.uk/strategy/corestrategy.pdf. Meijer, J. (jmeijer@mma.gob.cl), 13 September 2011. RE: Información Residuos. Email to M. SERRANO (mserrano@mma.gob.cl). Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA), 2011. Registro de emisiones y transferencias de contaminantes. Available at: http://www.retc.cl. Organización para la Cooperación y Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE), 2005. Evaluaciones de desempeño ambiental, Chile. Paris, France. Terraza, H., 2009. Manejo de residuos sólidos. lineamientos para un servicio integral, sustentable e inclusivo. Banco Inter-Americano de Desarrollo. Departamento de Infraestructura y Medio Ambiente. Technical note N° IDB-TN-101. Available at: http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument. aspx?docnum=2197909 waste chapter 3