PERCEPCIÓN DEL RIESGO:

Referencias
PERCEPCIÓN DEL RIESGO:
REFERENCIAS
Adams, J. G. U. (1988). Risk homeostasis and the purpose of safety regulation.
Ergonomics, 31 (4), 407-428.
Anderson, J. W. (1978). The effectiveness of traffic safety material in influencing
the driving performance of the general driving population. Accident Analysis
and Prevention, 10 (2), 81-94.
Benda, H. von y Hoyos, C. G. (1983). Estimating hazards in traffic situations.
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 15, 1-9.
Brown, I. D. y Copeman, A. K. (1975). Driver attitudes to the seriousness of traffic
offences considered in relation to the design of sanctions. Accident Analysis
and Prevention, 7, 15-26.
Brown, I. D. y Groeger, J. A. (1988). Risk perception and decision taking during the
transition between novice and experienced driving status. Ergonomic, 31 (4),
585-597.
Carbonell, E., Montoro, L., Sanmartín, J. y Tortosa, F. (1995). Percepción por los
usuarios de los factores de seguridad y de riesgo en la autopista. Anuario de
Psicología, 65, 59-82.
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. y Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived
stress. J Health Soc Behav, 24(4), 385-396.
DGT (2003a). Anuario de Accidentes 2002. Series estadísticas. Dirección General de
Tráfico. Ministerio del Interior. Madrid.
1
Referencias
DGT (2003b) Notas de prensa. Desciende casi un 3% la siniestralidad en carretera
durante el año 2002. Dirección General de Tráfico. Ministerio del Interior.
Madrid.
Douvan, E. (1974). Commitment and social contract in adolescence. Psychiatry, 37,
22-36.
Dreyer, D. y Janke, M. (1979). The effects of range versus nonrange driver training
on the accident and conviction frequencies of young drivers. Accident
Analysis and Prevention, 11, 179-198.
Evans, L. y Wasielewsky, P. (1982). Do accident-involved drivers exhibit riskier
everyday driving behaviours? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 14, 57-64.
Fuller, R. (1984). A conceptualization of driving behaviour as threat avoidance.
Ergonomics,27(11), 1139-1155.
Gras-Pérez, Mª. E. (1994). Efecto de las pérdidas y ganancias recientes en el riesgo
asumido por los automovilistas. Psicothema, 6(2), 123-137.
Guerin, B. (1994). What do people think about the risks of driving? Implications
for traffic safety interventions. Journal of Applied Social Pychology, 24, 994-1021.
Haight, F. A. (1986). Risk; especially risk of traffic of accident. Accident Analysis and
Prevention, 18, 359-366.
Harvey, C. F., Jenkins, D. y Sumner, R. (1975). Driver error. U.K. Dept. of the
Environment, T.R.R.L.Supplementary Report 149UC.
Hoyes, T. W., Dorn, L., Desmond, P. A. y Taylor, R. (1996). Risk homeostasis
theory, utility and accident loss in a simulated driving task. Safety Science, 22
(1), 49-62.
Huguenin, R. D. (1988) The concept risk and behaviour models in traffic
psychology. Ergonomics, 31 (4), 557-569.
Janssen, W. y Tenkink, E. (1988). Risk homeostasis theory and its critics: time for
an agreement. Ergonomics, 31 (4), 429-433.
Jonah, B. A. (1986). Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers.
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 255-271.
2
Referencias
Matthews, M. L. y Moran, A. R.
(1986). Age differences in male drivers’
perception of accident risk: the role of perceived driving ability. Accident
Analysis and Prevention, 18, 229-313.
Maythew, D. R., Donelson, A. C., Bierness, D. J. y Simpon, H. M. (1986). Youth,
alcohol and relative risk of crash involvement. Accident Analysis and
Prevention, 18, 273-287.
McKenna, F. P. (1988). What role should the concept of risk play in theories of
accident involvement? Ergonomics, 31 (4), 469-484.
Montoro, L., Alonso, F., Esteban, C., y Toledo, F. (2000). Manual de seguridad vial: El
factor humano. Ariel Intras: Valencia.
Näätänen, R. Summala, H. (1974). A model for the role of motivational factors in
drivers´decision-making. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6(3-4), 243-261.
Oppe, S. (1988). The concept of risk: a decision theoretic approach. Ergonomics, 31
(4), 435-440.
Ortet, G., Ibáñez, M. I., Moro, M. y Silva, F.( 1997). Cuestionario de personalidad de
Eysenck-revisado. Madrid: TEA.
Sabey, B. E. y Taylor, H. (1980). The known risks we run: the highway. U.K. Dept.
of the Environment, Dept. of Transport, T.R.R.L. Supplementary Report 567.
Simonet, S. y Wilde, G. J. S. (1997). Risk: Perception, acceptance and homeostasis.
Applied Psychology: An Internartional Review, 46 (3), 235-252.
SPSS, Inc. (1999). SPSS for windows (Version 10.0). Chicago: Author.
Stetzer, A. y Hofmann, D. A. (1996). Risk compensation: Implications for safety
interventions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66 (1), 7388.
Svenson, O. (1978). Risks of road transportation in a psychological perspective.
Accident Analysis and Prevention, 10(4), 267-280.
Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?
Acta Psychologica, 47(2), 143-148.
Toledo, F. y Alonso, F. (1997). El comportamiento humano en la conducción:
Modelos explicativos. En F. Toledo (Ed.), El factor humano en la conducción de
3
Referencias
trenes: Manual de conducción segura (pp. 69-90). Valencia: Línea editorial
INTRAS.
Wilde, G. J. S. (1982). The theory of risk-homeostasis: Impllication for safety and
health. Risk Analysis, 4, 209-225
Wilde, G. J. S. (1988). Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accidents: propositions,
deductions and discussion of dissension in recent reactions. Ergonomics, 31
(4), 441-468.
Wilde, G. J. S. (2001). Riesgo deseado? El comportamiento humano ante el peligro.
Versión al español: L. D. Ramírez. México City: Asociación Mexicana de
Higiene y Seguridad.
Wilde, G. J. S. y Murdoch, P. A. (1982). Incentive systems for accident-free and
violation-free driving in the general population. Ergonomics, 25, 879-890.
Wilde, G. J. S., Robertson, L. S. Y Pless, I. B. (2002).For and against: Does risk
homeostasis theory have implications for road safety. BMJ, 324 (7346), 11491152.
4