Generic boundaries and evolution of characters in the Arctium group: a nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis A. SUSANNA, N. GARCIA-JACAS, R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE RESUMEN SUSANNA, A., N. GARCIA-JACAS. R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE (2003). Gencric boundaries and evolUlion of characlers in (he Arclilllll group: a nuclear and chloroplasl DNA analysis. Callee'. BOl. (Bllrce!OIU1) 26: 101-118. Definir los límites genéricos en el grupo Arc/;/l1/I (Composi/(ll!. Car(/ul!al!-C{/l'dllilwe). formado por los géneros ArctiulI1, COlIsillitl. Hypac(IIl/!liulI1 y Schlllal1wlIsell;a, ha resultado ser una tarea muy complicada. Concretamente, la separación precisu de Are/il/m y COl/sillia es muy difrcil de establecer. En consecuencia. hemos :lOaliz.ado las secuencias del DNA de dos regiones. el gen cloropltistico marK y los espaciadores ITS 1 y 2 del ONA ribos6mico-nuc1cllT. de una amplia representación de todos los géneros del grupo: en el caso de CO/l.~il1ia, centrándonos en las especies más obviamente relacionadas con Arctilflll, ¡'Iemos cncontrtldo una correlaci6n exacta entre Iilogenia molecular y dos caracteres fundamentales. el tipo de polen y el número cromos6mico: todas las especies estudiadas que lienen el tipo de polen Arctiastmll1 y el número x= 18, característicos de Arctilllll sensu stricto. forman un ciado monofilético. hermano de ouo ciado monofilético formado por las especies de COlIsillia sensu suicto. Sin embargo. el ciado "Arclioide" no se puede definir con caracteres morfol6gicos macrosc6picos: el carácter que separa Arctil/lI1 y COIlSillia son las hojas espinoso·pinnatifidas o pinnatisectas de COlIsiltia, que es adaptativo y tiene poca relevancia taxonómica. Según nuestros resultados, las espinas habrían aparecido en dos linajes diferelllcs: en COl/sillia. por una parte, y en H)'fJacanr/¡irllll y Sdll/rtlllral/sel1ia. que son espinosos y morfológicamente más pr6ximos a COlIsinia, pero que están sin duda más relacionados con Arctil/lIl, inerme. Evaluamos también las implicaciones de esta incongruencia entre morfologfa, por un lado, y datos moleculares, palinol6gicos y cariológicos, por otro. Proponemos algunas soluciones, pero ninguna es totalmeme satisfactoria: se necesitan más estudios que incluyan más especies de COl/sillia subg. H)'fJacanrltotles. Palabras clave: Compositae, Arclilllll, COl/sil/io, Hypaclllllhilllll, ScllIIrtllI/(lI/sCl1itl. cvolución, Iilogenia molecular. Abstraet SUSANNA, A., N, OARCIA-JACAS, R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE (2003), Generic boundaries and evolution of chllracters in lhe Arc/il/III group: a nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis, Collec/, BOl. (BlIrcelolw) 26: 101-118. Oeneric delineation within the Arctil/lI1 group (Colllposi/(/c, Ct/n/ueac-Caf(/l/il1ac), formed by (he genertl Arctilll/l. COl/sin;a, HYI'{/cmrlhilllll and Sdrllllllhol/senia, has proven a cornplicated task. In panicular. the precise limits betwccn Arc/il/III and COlIsillia are vcry difficuh to establish. Therefore, we have carried out a molecular survey of DNA sequences of two regions. the chloroplast gene II1l1tK and the lluclear-ribosornal spacers ITS I and 2, of a represe mm ion of alllhe genera of the group (in the case of COlIsillia, centred in the species more obviously related to Arc/irllll). Our results show a precise eorrellllion belwecn molecular phylogcny and Alfonso Susanna, Núria Gareia-Jacas, Roser Vilatersana & Teresa Garnalje. BOlanicallnslilulC of Barcelona (C.S.I.C.-Ajuntamenl de Barcelona), Pg. del Migdia. s/n .• E-08038 Barcelona (Spain). AUlhor for correspondence: A. Susanna (asusanna@ibb.csic.es) 102 COLLECTANEA BOTANICA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 two very important characters. pollen type and chromosome numbers: all Ihe investignted species wilh lhe ArctiaSlrllI11 pollen Iype and x= 18. characlerislics of Arrt;lIm sensu 5lneto. forro a monophylclic c1ade. sister lO another monophylctic dade Cormed by allthe invesligalcd species of COllsinill sensu slrictO. However. (he resulting ..Arc:tioid" c1ade canno! be defined on macroscopic morphologic charnclers. because Ihe mnin Il1Iil for segregaling Arctilllll and COI/$in;a. (he spiny pinn:l.lifid-pinnatisecl ¡caves of COIIsinia. is adllplnlive and of scaree syslemalic relevaoce. In facl. OUT resulls suggeSI Ihll( spines have appeared al Icnsl in two differenl lineages: (he genera HypaClllII/¡ill/ll and Schmalllallsenia. spiny and thus morphologi· cally doser lO COl/si/lia. are unambiguously relllted to Ihe unarmed genus Arelil/III. A hypoth. esis on lhe evolution of morphology, pollen and chromosome numbers in the group is formul:ned. The systematic implications of this incongruence between molecular. pollen and karyology. on the onc hand. and morphology, on the other h:md, are evaluated. Sorne possible solutions are proposed. bul none of Ihem is tOlally satisfactory: more studies nre necessary wilh Ihe inc1usion of ncw speeies of COl/sinia subgenus Hypaclll1/l1odes. Key words: Composi((le, ArClil/lIl. COl/sillia, HYfJacal1/hil/lI1. Sc/¡malJrfIllSeI1Ü,. evolution, molcculnr phylogeny. [NTRODUCTION The tribe Cardueae has always been a conflicting group, and both tribal and subtribal delineaIion has been much disputed (CASSINI, 1819; BENTHAM, 1873; HOFFMANN. 1894; WAGENITZ, 1976; OIITRICH, 1977; PETIT el al., 1996; PETIT, 1997; BREMER, 1994). However, all surveys on Ihe basis of ONA analyses support Ihe monophyly of Ihe lribe: cpONA reslriclion sile dala (JANSEN el al., 1990, 1991), cpONA rbcL gene (KIM el al., 1992), cpONA marK gene (GARCIA-JACAS el al., 2(02) and nrONA spacers ITS 1 and 2 (SUSANNA el al., 1995; GARCIA-JACAS el al., 2(02). The subtriballimits are more complicaled lo establish, but the tradilional e1assification in four subtribes (Carlinillae, Ecllillopsidillae, Carduillae and Cemal/reillae) remains the only practical approaeh (SUSANNA & GARCIA-JACAS, in press) and is generally accepted. Having acknowledged the tribal and subtribal limits, the next step was lo e1arify the delimitation of sorne of the major genera in the tri be. Now, among the most interesting and vexing problems of genus rank that persist in the Cardueae is the marking of lhe generic boundaries in the Arelillm group. The Arclilllll group The Arclium group eomprises the genera Are/il/m L., Cousit¡ia Cass.. Hypacamllium Juz. and Scllmallrallsenia C, Winkl. (H.i,FFNER, 2000; SUSANNA & GARCIA-JACAS, in press). HAFFNER (2000) adds (he genera Upskydla Juz. and TIarocarplls Rech. f., merged into COllsinia by SUSANNA & GARCIA-JACAS (in press). Three important eharacters never found in combination elsewhere in the tribe characterize basically theAre/illm group. First, the receptaele has strongly twisted scales. Second, the achenes are always tigrine (with a panero of wavy fringes), very often winged, and without a neclary. Third, the pappus is formed by free deciduous bristles (SUSANNA & GARCIAJACAS, 2003). 80th on morphological and molecular grounds, the genera Arclium and COIIsit¡ill belong to the subtribe Carduill11e. More precisely, the Aretium group is part of a large e1ade ineluding also the subtribe Celllaureillae and the genera Saussl/rea Oc. and JI/rillea Cass. (GARCIA-JACAS el aL, 2002). Are/il/m eomprises 11 species, according to the latest c1assification of the genus (DUISTERMAAT, 1996), most of lhem wilh a subcosmopolitan distribution. DUISTERMAAT A. SUSANNA, N. GARCIA-JACAS, R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE 103 (1996) recognized four sections: Arcti1l11l sect. Arctilllll (Wilh all lhe species classically included in Arctium), and three more sections described as sections of the genus Co//si"ia by TSCHERNEVA (I988b, 1988c): sections Lappaceu11l, Nllllarctilll1l and Pselldarctiu/1/. The large genus COLlsinia is formed of ca. 600 species (MAIlIlERLEY, 1990) located in lhe Iranian and Turkeslanian mountain regions, with an aSlonishing number of ende mies. Both lhe limils and lhe sectional classification of COllsi/lia have widely changed. Proposals by BUNGE (1865), BOIssIER (1875), KUNTZE (1891), WINKLER (1892) and BORNMÜLLER (1916) were superseded by TSCHERNEVA (1962) in her trealmenl for lhe Flora of lhe USSR. La<er on, lhis treatmenl was again deeply modified with the proposal of two new subgenera and many new sections and series (TSCHERNEVA, 1988a). The latest revision classified COllsillia in lhree subgenera and 50 seelions (TSCHERNEVA, 1988b, 1988e). The rest of lhe genera of the ArClill1ll group recognized by SUSANNA &GARCIA·1ACAS (in press) are very small: Sc!lmal/¡ausellia is monotypic, and Hypacallt/¡illlll has only three species. 80th genera are narrow endemics of the mounlains of CenLral Asia (Tien-Shan and Pamir). The eXlremely conflicling relalionships belween the genera of lhe Arcti/lf11 group are reflected in lhe many reclassifications suggested in Lhe group thal imply changes of genus adscriplion. We shall shortly commenL on sorne especially il1uslrative examples. The prolologue of lhe genus Hypacallfhilllll placed it near SC/¡lIIal/¡ausellia. Previously, it had been described as COllsinia ec/¡il1opifolia Bomrn. and combined as SC/¡lIIalhallsellia ec/¡illopifolia (Bornm.) Juz. According Lo TSCHERNEVA (1983), Hypacllllr/¡iu/1/ was also connected to Cousinia subgenus Hypacallt/¡odes Tschemeva sect. Lacerae, and related to genus Sc/¡malltausenia. In its lurn, Scfmllllllll/lSellia was firsL described as COllsillia eriophora Regel & Schmalh. As we have seen aboye, it was al so relaled lo Hypacall1/¡illlll, and il was even combined as Arctiu11l eriopltorum (Regel & Schmalh.) Kuntze. These entangling cases are illustralive enough, but Lhe besL example 01' lhe problems of generic range in the group is the case of Arcri///1/ and COllsi"ia. Relationships between the genera Arclium and COllsillia A c10se conneclion between both genera has been signalled fram old (B01SS1ER. 1875: KUNTZE, 1891). AH recenl studies have confirmed lhis conneclion: morphological surveys by DITIRICH, 1977; DUISTERMAAT, 1996, 1997; PETIT el al., 1996; PETIT, 1997; HAFFNER, 2000; or molecular analy,es by HAcFNER & HELLWIG, 1999; GARCIA-JACAS el al., 2002, are all coincident. Species of Arctiu11l and Cousillia have moved belween genera very often: Boissier (1875) combined Lappa (=Arctill1l1 !) a"'plissima Boiss. as COlIsi/lia alllplissillla; and KUNTZE (1891) proposed lhe c1assification of alJ the species of Co//si/lia in lhe genus ArctiulII. in view of the impossibility of establishing the precise limils between botll genera. The main obstacle for Lhe precise delineation between Arcti//I/I and Cousinia is the presence of a group of COllsillia species (the "Arctioid" group for DUISTERMAAT, 1996) wilh many characters shared with Arc,illm: above al1, lhe presence of glochidiale spines in (he appendages of lhe bracts and the big unarmcd lea ves. The most recent proposa! was Ihe Solulion suggested by DUISTERMAAT (1996) and followed by SUSANNA & GARCIA-JACAS (in press): Lo c1assify lhe more obviously "Arclioid" Cousi/lia species (5 species from differenl sections) into Arctiu11l, while exporling TSCHERNEVA 's (1988 b, 1988 c) secLionai c1assification of Lhese species of COlIsillia lo ArctiulIl. Soon after, DUISTERMAAT (1997) suggesled a rectification of her own views, and poinled out vaguely Ihat all Lhe species of COllsi/lia subg. Cynaroides Tscherneva could be placed in ArctiuIIl. COLLECTANEA BOTANICA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 104 We shall shortly explain lhe maio traits thal have been used in the delimitation of the genera of the Are/j//m group: morphology, karyoiogy, pollen and geography: Morphological characters: leaves, bracls and heads Arcril/m leaves are always unanned, often very big (lO 80 cm) and usally cardate, bOlh characlers being shared by COl/sinia subg. Cy"aroides and Hypacanthodes. In contrast, COl/sinia subg. COl/sinia leaves are small, usually lanceolate and with few exceptions very spiny. Involucral bracts are a key character. In Arcriwll sensu stricto and part of Cousillia subgenus Cynaroides (the "Arctioid" species of COlls;lIia). involucral bracls always end in a recurved hook. Instead, in most of (he species of Cousillia, involucral bracts end in a spine withoul hook. OUler florets in ArctiulIl often have longer and brighter coloured anlher-tubes, mimicking ouler radianl ligules. Instead, many COIlsillia species often have bright-coloured appendages in the innermost bracls, recalling those of Carlilla L. As lO floral morphology, DUISTERMAAT (1996) concluded lhal the stigma of COllsinia subg. COl/sil/ia was very different from lhe stigma of Arctium and the "Arctioid" species. For DUl5TERMAAT (1996), COl/sillia subg. COllsinia lacked the hairy lhickening below the branehes lhal is a key eharaeler for lhe lribe Cardueae. HiiFFNER (2000) noled lhal lhe sweeping ring of hairs was also absent in Schmalhallse"ia. Habil According to DUISTERMAAT (1996), rnonocarpic habil is a key characler for Arelilllll. Instead, COllsinia species are, with only a few exceptions, perennials. Sorne "Arctioid" species of Co//sinia are rnonocarpic, bUl rnost of them are perennials (TSCHERNEVA, 1962). Dispersal is also differenl. 80th genera share a [eature infrequent in lhe tri be: achenes are dispersed logelher with the heads. In Arctillm and most of the "Arctioid" group, propagules are usually the whole heads, dispersed by exozoochory by means of the hooks of the involucral bracts. On the contrary, mosl species of COllsillia are turnble weeds, like rnany plants fram the steppe: the whole plant is dispersed by the wind. Chromosorne nurnbers According to literature (revised in DUI5TERMAAT, 1996), ArcliulII always has x;;;; 18 and 211 ;;;; 36. The same number is shared by aH the studied species of COllsillia from Ihe subgenera CYlloroides and Hypacalltliodes (TSCHERNEVA, 1985). The genus Sehmolho//sellio also has 211 = 36 (SUSANNA el al., 2003). This high number, lhe highesl in all lhe Cardlleae, suggesl that ArClil/m, CO/lsinio subg. CYllaroides and HypocomllOdes, and Schmalhallsellia, eonslilUle old polyploid eomplexes (TSCHERNEVA, 1988 e). COl/sil/io subgenus COl/sinia has 211;;;; 18?, 20? [doubtful to usl, 22, 24 and 26 (MOORE, 1973. ¡ 977; GOLDBLATT, 1981, 1988; GOLDBLATT & 10HNSON, 1990, 1991; GHAFFARI & DJAVADI, 1998; GHAFFAR] el al., 2000; SUSANNA el al., 2003). This long and complex disploid series is a proof that both groups have evolved in differenl ways. Palien SCHTEPA (1966) first noted thal so me species of Cousinia have the same pollen type as Arctil/l1I. Later, she discovered that COIlSillio subgenera CYl/aroides and Hypaelllllhodes ha ve pollen similar [O Arelil/m, while Cousillia subg. COllsinio has a different palien type A. SUSANNA, N. GARCIA-JACAS, R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE 105 1976). KUPRIANOVA & TSCHERNEVA (1982) conf¡rmed Ihe I\VO palien Iypes and named them Arcl;aslrulII (cireumseribed to Arcl;//11/ and Co//sinia subg. CYllaroides and Hypaconthodes) and Co//sinia (Iimited to COllS;Il;O subg. Co//sin;o). OUISTERMAr\T (1996) arrived al the same eonelusions of SCHTEPA (1976) and KUPRIANOVA & TSCHERNEVA (1982). Nevertheless, she did not favour the inelusion of alllhe speeies of lhe Co//sinia subgenera wilh ArcliaSlrum pollen type in ArctiuIII, beeause palien types in the tribe are usually round in more than one genus. Aceording lo our observations, SC/¡l1Ialllllllsenia has Arct;ostrum poli en type, and the palien type of Hypacalll/¡;IlI/1 is unknown. (SCHTEPA. Geographic distribution The genus ArClium has a peculiar dislribulion, with lwo groups wilh marked differences in this respeee In lhe definition by DUISTERMAAT (1996), the species of ArCI;1l1ll sensu striclo (sect. Arc!illm) are subeosmopolitan. The resl of the species (Le., alllhe species previously e1assified in the genus COllsillia) have a cenlral Asian distribution, as lhe gcnus Co//sinia. On the olher hand, distribulion of the genus COllsinia is eharaeleristie of lhe mounlain flora of lhe Irano-Turanian Region, coincidenl wilh lhe "Orienlal·Turanian Flora Region" defined by MEUSEL et al. (1965); see KNAPP (I987). There are two main cenlres of speciatíon: lhe western region with 251 species, and lhe eaSlern region with 340 species (TSCHERNEVA, 1974). Mosl of the speeies of Co//s;/Iia subg. CYlloroides and Hypacanthodes grow only in lhe easlern regíon, as do the genera Schmalhallsellia and Hypacallt/¡;IlII1. Only three out of se ven sections of subg. CYllaro;des are present in the western region wilh only one species endemíc lO Iran (RECHINGER, 1972, 1979). The other species are present in both regions. Regarding CO/lsi1l;o subgenus Hypacolllhodes, lhere are no representatives in the western region. Our objectives The combined analysis of the nrONA region ITS and the chloroplast ONA gene marK has pro ven an excellent tool for unravelling problems at this level in lhe Cardueae (GARCIA-JACAS et aL, 2001, 2002). Thereafter, \Ve have carried out a molecular survey of bolh regions in a sample of aH lhe genera of lhe ArctiulII group \Vith the following goals: 1) To verify lhe monophyly of the ArctiuIIl group 2) To establish the generic boundaries of Arcl;ulII and CO/lsi/l;a 3) To compare nuelear ribosomal and chloroplasl DNA phylogeny and lhe evolulion of lhe palien types, basic chromosome numbers and lTlorphology in lhe group 4) To contribute with a preliminary study lO lhe infrageneric classificalion of the genus COllS;ll;a. MATEIlIALS ANO METHOOS Plant material Sampling was based on lhe seclional c!assificatioll of lhe genus CO/lsillio by TSCHERNEVA (l988b, 1988c). We have inc1uded 27 taxa of the genus COl/sillia from 19 seclions, lhree species of the genus Arcliul1I, one species oC lhe genus Hypacalllllium and the only species of the monospecific genus Sc!lmalllOlIsellio. The five outgroup species were chosen in the genera Juri/leo and Saussureo according 10 previous 106 COLLECTANEA BQTANICA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 sequence analysis (SUSANNA et al., 1995; OARCIA-JACAS el al., 2002). Voueher data, source and GenBank sequence accession numbers of the lTS and malK sequences for (he 37 s[udied species are given in Table 1. The analysis sequences used published sequences aJong with new sequences. ITS sequences of Arel;"", Jappa L., Arctiu11I 111;''''5 Bernh., COllS;lI;a canescells DC.. C. esfalldiarii Rech. f. & Aellen (both ITS and marK) and C. oflopordioides Ledeb. were from a previous sludy (GARCIA-JACAS el al.. 2002). Sequence of COIIs;lliQ pterocaulos (C. A. Mey.) Reeh. f. was from HilFFNER & HELLWIG (1999). DNA Extraclion, Amplific31ion and Sequencing TOlal geoomie DNA was extraeled following the CTAB melhod of DOYLE and DoyLE (1987) as modified by SOLTIS et al. (1991) and CULLlNGS (1992) from siliea gel dried lea ves collected in the field, or fresh ¡caves of plants cultivated in the Botanic Institute of Barcelona. In sorne cases, herbarium material was used. cpDNA malK gene strategies Double-stranded DNAs of matK were amplified by PCR with tmK-71OF (JOHNSON & SOLTIS, 1995) and AST-I R {OARCJA-JACAS el al., 2002} as PCR primers. Sometimes this combinalion failed lo generate double-stranded products for some taxa and we used matKl848R (JOHNSON & SOLTIS, 1995) primer, as a subslitUle of primer AST-lR. 40 eycles of amplification were carried OUl under lhe following conditions: 94°C for 1 minute 30 seconds, 480C for 2 minules and 720C for 3 minules, with an addilional eXlension step of 15 minutes at 72°C. The double-stranded PCR produets were c1eaned using QlAquiek PCR Purifieation Kit (Qiagen lne.) and sequeneed. Sequeneing primers tmK-7IOF, matK-1848R and AST-lR were used. Oirecl sequencing of lhe amplified ONA segments was performed using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequeneing v2.0 (PE Biosystems), following the protoeol recommended by the manufacturero The nucleotide sequencing was performed al the "Serveis Cienlífieo-Téenics" of the University of Barcelona on an AB] PRlSM 3700 DNA Analyzed (PE Biosystems). Nucleolide sequences of /l/a/K were edited using Chromas 1.56 (Teehnelysium Pty Ltd) and easily aligned by hand. nrONA ITS region slralegies Double-slranded DNA of lhe lTS region was amplified using the l7SE as forward primer and the 26SE as reverse primer (SUN et al., 1994). The profile used for amplifiealion included a warm start at 94°C for 2 minules, followed by 800C for 5 minutes, during which the polymerase {Ecolaq, Eeogen S. R. L.} was added. 30 eyeles of amplifieation were carried out under the following condilions: 94°C for 1 minute 30 seconds, 57°C for 2 minutes and 72°C for 3 minutes, with an additional extension slep of 15 minutes at 72°c' The PCR produets were purified wilh the QlAquiek PCR Purification Kil (Qiagen lne.). Both strands were sequenced with the sequencing primers 17SE as forward primer, and 26SE as reverse. Direct sequencing of lhe amplified DNA segments was performed as for lhe matK region. Phylogenetic analysis DNA sequences were aligned visually by sequential pairwise comparison (SWOFFORD & OLSEN, 1990). Data matrices are available on request from the correspondence author. Parsimony analysis in volved heurislic searches conducted wilh PAUP version 4.0b4a A. SUSANNA, N. GARCIA-JACAS, R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE 107 TabJe 1.- Origin of the material s and herbaria where lhe vouchcrs are deposited. Species Arctil/III lappa L. Arctil/lII lejosperllllll1l Juzo & C. Serg. ArctiulIl mjnlls Bernh. Cousillia cllrysall1ha Kult. COllsinia piprocepJwla Bunge Voucher Arctillltl GARCIA JACAS el al. (2002) Kazakhstan. Suscu/lla 2/54 el al. (BC) GARCIA-JACAS el al. (2002) COllsinia subg. COllsillia COlIsinia secl. Alpillae Kazakhstan, SlIsamw 2198 er al. (Be) COl/sil/ia sect. Badgl1ysia Iran, K. H. Rec/lillger 46730 (B) COl/sillia riallshallica Kuh. cOI/!.illia secl. Cardll/lCelllls Kazakhslan, Sllsalllw 2191 el al. (BC) Cousillia dis.fecla COlIsinia sect. Chrysoptera Kazakhslan, SusamUl 2137 el al. (BC) Kar. & Kir. COl/sinja coronala Franch. COllsillia sect. CorollopllOra Uzbekistan. SusaJllla 2039 er al. (BC) COllsillia cOllgesta Bunge COlIsillia secl. COlIsillia Uzbek¡stan. SlIsalllUl 2059 el al. (BL) Cousillia millkwitziae Bornm. Kazakhstan. Sl/:wmUl 2183 el al. (BC) COl/sil/ia po/yceplwla Rupr. Kazakhstan. SlIsamla 2161 el al. (BC) COllsinia syrdariensis Kult. Kazakhslan, SII.WiIllIa 2159 el al. (BC) Accession lIlatK 1TS AF319048 AY013520 AF319102 AY373720 AY373687 AF319049 AY013521 AF319103 AY373725 AY373660 AY373692 AYJ737J6 AY373703 AY373743 AY373671 AY373710 AY373728 AY373695 AY373727 AY373662 AY373694 AY373726 AY373693 AY373735 AY373702 AY373738 AY373705 AY373741 AY373708 AY373óM AY373661 AY373668 AY373669 COllsillia sect. CYllal'Oideae COl/sillia canescens OC GARCIA-JACAS et al. (2002) COlIsillia ollopon/ioides GARCIA-JACAS et al. (2002) Ledeb. COllsillia purpurea Armenia. K. Ttmwllia/l (ERE) C. A. Mey COllsillia caespilosa COl/si"ia sect. EriocolIsinia Kazakhstan, SlIsamla 2170 et al. (BC) C. Winkl. AF319068 AF319122 AF319070 AF319124 AY373739 AY373663 AY373706 AY373724 AY373673 AY373691 COlIsinia eriobasis Bunge COlIsinia sect. Lacflllosplwerae Iran, K. H. Recllinger 47012 (B) Cousillia aSlracallica COlIsinia secl. Leiocaules Kazakhstan, SlIscullla 2104 et al. (BC) AY373723 AY373670 (Spreng.) Tamamsch. AY373729 AY373696 AY373690 COLLEcrANEA BOTAN1CA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 108 COl/sinia sect. Microcarpae KazakhSlan. Susam" 214U el al. (Be) COlls;n;a aroe/moldea Fisch. & C. A. Mey COlisi"ia microcarpa Boiss. Kazakhstan. SllsamlO 2160 el al. (Be) COI/sil/la platylepis Schrenk Kazakhstan. SUSlIIlIlO 2J58 el al. (BC) COl/sil/¡a sewerzowii Regel Kazakhslan, SUSllIlIID 2178 el al. (Be) LOlIsillia eS{Ondiarii UARCIA-JACAS el al. (2002) AY3~~7n AYJ7jbOb AY373689 AY373734 AY373667 AY373701 AY373737 AY373665 AY373704 AY373740 AY373674 AY373707 COlIsillia sect. Srenoceplwlae Rech. r. & Aellen COIIS;";O PfUOCOlllos AF319vo9 AYOl3537 AF319123 COlIsinia sect. Xiphiolepides HAFfNER & HEllW¡G (1999) (C. A. Mey.) Rech. f. Cousilllo Karoravlea COllsinia subg. Cy"aroides COl/sif/ia sect. Chrysis KazakhSlan. SusamlO 2/62 el al. (BC) Regel & Schmalh. AY373732 AY373678 AY373699 COllsilli(1 secL ulppaceae COl/sil/io lappacea Bunge Kazakhstan, SI/samia 2J50 et al. (Be) COl/sil/ia triflora Schrenk Cousilllo secl Oligamha Kazakhslan. SI/samia 2157 el al. (BC) ~'ollsillia COlIsillia secl Peclillalae Kazakf1stan. SIlSa1l1la 2200 el al. (He) albeni Regel & Schmalh. AY373733 AY373677 AY373700 AY373744 AY373675 AY373711 AY~~~lll AY:l7JbHU AY373688 COlIsillia I/mbrosa Bunge COllsillia sect. Pselltlarclilllll Kazakhstan. SlIsl/I/IIa 2/00 elaf. (BC) COl/sillia grtl1ltli/ofia Kult. COllsitlia subg. Hypacatllhodes COllsillia secl. Amberbopsis Kazakhslan. SI/Sl/lllla 218/ el al. (Be) AYJ7J745 AY37367b AY373712 AYJ'J':~ AY37367Y AY373697 Hypaca"thium Hypacamll iwn ecJrinopijolium Kirguizistan. llji" (LE) (Bomm.) Juz. Schlllalhausellia llitlllla1lS Schmall,allsellia Kazakhstan. ::iusalllra 2088 el at. (BC) (Regel) Petr. JI/rillea albiClllllis Bunge Outgroup LJreece, SIISlIllIW 1957 el al. (I:R":) JI/rillea ltlllipes Rupr. Kazakhstan. SIISl/I/IIlI 2136 tN al. (BC) Jurillltll robllsUl Schrenk Kazakhstan. SUSlIllf1ll2103 el a/. (BC) Smusllrell elega1rs Ledeb. Kazakhslan. SI/salllla 2/79 el al. (BC) Sallssllna maximolViczii OfuRa BOlanieal Garden (Japan) Herder AY37374b AY373713 AY373752 AY373681 AY373719 AY J w ", AY373714 AY373748 AY373715 AY373749 AY373716 AY373750 AY373717 AY373751 AY373718 AY373"". AY373686 AY373685 AY373683 AY373682 A. SUSANNA. N. GARCIA-JACAS, R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE 109 (SWOFFORD, 1999) using TBR branch swapping wilh character states specified as unordered and unweighted. The indels were coded as fiflh base. AH most-parsimonious trces (MPTs) were saved. To locate other potential islands of most-parsimonious trces (MADDISON, 1991), we performed 1000 replications with random taxon addition, also with TBR branch swapping. Bootstrap analyses (BS) were performed (FELSENSTE1N, 1985) wilh 1000 replicates, and decay indices (DI) were calculated (BREMER, 1988; DONOGHUE el al., 1992) to obtain estimates of support for each monophyletic group. AH the decay analyses were conducted using the elade-constraint approach as discussed in MORGA N (1997). Three parsimony analyses were performed, with three different data sets: the ITS dala, the mQtK data and Ihe combined ITS and mal K data. The nrDNA ITS and cpDNA matK data sets were tesled for congruence using the partition homogeneity test (FARRIS et aL, 1995) as implemented in PAUP 4.0b4a, before combining the data sets. The partition homogeneity test was conducted with 1000 replicates, heuristic search option with simple addilion sequence, TBR, and MULPARS. RESULTS Nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS The ITS 1 and ITS 2 alignment of 37 laxa consisted of 484 positions and eontained 131 phylogenetically informative substitutions and 7 phylogenelically informative indels. Mean pairwise distances (as calculated by PAUP) within ingroup varied from 0% (between COlIsillia cOllgesla Bunge and C. caespirosa C. Winkl.; C. syrdariellsis Kult. and C. polycephala Rupr.) to 11.8% (between C. kararavica Regel & Schmalh. and C. plerocalllos). Mean pairwise distan ces between ingroup and outgroup varied rrom 10.9% (belween Saussurea elegans Ledeb. and Hypacall1hiwll echinopifofium Juz.) to 16.8% (bclween lurillea albicalllis Bunge and COlIsinia syrdariellsis). The parsimony analysis yielded 91 MPTs of346 steps in one island. Thc strict conscnsus of aH the trees is shown in Fig. 1; the consistency index (el) exeluding uninformative eharaeters was 0.4780; the retenlion index (RI) was 0.7570; and the homoplasy index (HI) was 0.5220. The striet consensus of lhe 91 MPTs produeed from lhe ITS analysis (Fig. 1) SUPP0rl monophyly of the Arclium group: Arclilllll, COlIsil/ia, Hypacanrhium and Schlllallltlusellia (BS = 93%, DI = 7). Within this elade, there were t\Vo branches: a first Dne, which \Ve \ViII name the "Arctioid" e1ade, comprised the genera Arctillm, Hypacal/lhiulII and Schmalhallsellia and the representatives of COl/sillia subg. CYllaroides and HypacclIIlhodes (SS 76%, DJ 2); und a second one formed by the represenlulives of COlIsinia subgenus Cousinia (SS = 86%, DI = 2). Within lhe "Arclioid" elade, there were two elades; one was formed by lhe genera Arclillm, Hypacal/lhillm and Schlllalhausellia and COllsinia gral/difolia Kult. from subgenus Hypacalll/wdes (SS =94%, DI = 3); lhe other e1ade was formed by the representatives of COlIsil/ia subgenus CYllaroides, with very strong supporl (BS = 100%, DI = 11). = = Chloroplast DNA malK The mal K alignment of 27 taxa consisted of 985 posltlons and contained 21 phylogenetically informative substitutions, Mean pairwise distances (as calculaled by PAUP) within ingroup varied from 0% (between Cousinia polycephala, C. syrdarienis and C. millkwirziae Bomm.; C. cae~pi[osa and C. asrracanica (Spreng.) Tamamsch.; C. gral/di/ofia 110 COLLECfANEA BQTAN1CA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 and C. karalavica) to 1.3% (between Schmal"allsell;a "idll/mls (Regel) Pelr. and COllsinia es/ondiarjj). Mean pairwise distances between ingroup and outgroup varied from 0.3% (between }Ilrillell robusta Schrenk and Cousillia caespitosa) to 1.3% (between Jur;nea lanipes Rupr. and SchmaJhausenia nidulalls). The parsimony analysis yielded 11431 MPTs of 25 steps in one island. The stricl consensus of all the lrees is shown in Ag. 2; the consistency index excluding uninformative characters (Cl) was 0.6333; lhe relention index (RI) was 0.8000; and lhe homoplasy index (HI) was 0.3667. The striet consensus of lhe 11431 MPTs produced from (he marK analysis (Fig. 2) supports monophyly of lhe Arctil/m group: Arclilllll. COlIsinia and Schlllalhausenia (SS = 78%, DI = 2). Wilhin lhis group, lhe only well defined clade was formed by COl/si"ia lappacea Bunge as sister (SS = 71 %, DI = 1) af a darle formed by (he genera ArcfiuIII, Sc¡'ma'hausetl;a and lhe represenlatives of COllsinia subgenera Cynaroides and Hypacolll/¡odes (SS = 92%, DI; 2). The reSl was unresolved as a polilomy. Combine<! nrONA ITS and cpONA lI/olK The P-value resulting fram the partition homogeneity test (P = 0.0570) ¡ndieates (hat data partitions are random, and there is congruence between nrONA ITS and cpDNA IIIatK data seIS, al a significance lhreeshold of P = 0.05 (FARRIS el al., 1995). The combined ITS-matK alignment of 29 laxa consisted of 1469 positions wilh 149 phylogenetically informative substitutions and 6 phylogenetically informative ¡ndels. Mean pairwise distances (as calculaled by PAUP) wilhin ingroup varied fram 0% (belween Cousinia syrdariellsis and C. polycephala) la 3.9% (between COllsinia cOI/gesta and ArCliulII lIIillllS). Mean pairwise distances beLween ingroup and oUlgroup varied from 4.1 % (between Sallssllrea efegalls and COllsillia microcarpa Boiss.) to 6% (between Jurinea afbicalllis and Sclullafhallse"ia n;dl/fans). The parsimony analysis yielded 8 MPTs of 329 steps in one island. The strict consensus of all the trees is shown in Fig. 3; lhe eonsistency index (el) exeluding uninforrnative charaeters was 0.5650; Ihe relenlion index (RI) was 0.7895; and Ihe homoplasy index (HI) was 0.4350. Like the ITS or malK alone, lhe striet consensus of the 8 MPTs obtained from the combined analysis (Fig. 3) strongly supports (BS = 93%, 01 = 6) lhe monophyly of Ihe Arctium group (Arctium, COlls;nia and SchmafhaIlSell;a). We have found again the two clades of lhe ITS analysis. One clade, lhe "ArClioid" clade, was formed by Ihe genera Aretillm, Schmafhausen;a and the representatives of COlls;nia subgenera CYllaro;des and Hypacalll/¡odes, wilh strong support (SS = 97%, DI = 5). Wilhin lhe "Arclioid" clade, lhere were two branehes, one with the genera Arct;llm and Schmafhallsellia, and COlIsin;a gralldifolia from subgenus Hypacall'hodes (BS = 89%, DI = 3), and a second branch formed by COIIsillia subgenus CYllaroides (BS = 100%, DI =12). The second clade, Ihe COllsillia e1ade, was formed by all the representatives of Cousillia subgenus COllsi/lia (BS:;;; 89%, DI:;;; 4). Relationships within the COlls;nia e1ade are unelear because of the limited scope of our sampling. D1SCUSSION Monophyly of lhe Arctium group The use of a combinalion of /1JalK and lTS data has proven again a good choice for our study: the resulting tree from the analysis of the combined dala shows excel1enl resolulion at all taxonomical levels (Fig. 3). The matK alone is not suitable for our purposes (Fig. 2) A. SUSANNA. N. GARCIA-JACAS. R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE III 97 ,........ Aretíum lappa 94 3 Q) . :' 76 " 2 Aretium lelospermum 5 87 ~ 2- ICausínía grandífalia subg. Hyp. -1 2" 1 72 100....2..f""P89 3 86 2 94....- 21- G3 88 ,........ 2,-- ,. o I «...J o'" o~ Hyhaeanthium eehinopifoJium Se malhausenia nidulans Cousinia albertii Cousinia karataviea J,QQ. - ,....:....r- Causinía umbrasa [Al 11 L..;-r'i""t1 Causínía lappaeea [Al 1 Cousinia triflora Cousinia araehnoidea Cousinia astracaniea ,...:... 51 _ 1 74"'T'U4- Cousinia eaneseens ~ 7 w 3 '-- Aretium minus " Ox . ..: f- 0>'" O ¡)lo « .o§, ~ Micro x- 12 Leioc x= 12 Cynar x= Causínía anapardíaídes Cynar x= Causínía purpurea Cynar x= Causínía pteraeaulas Xyph Cousinia eaespitosa Erioc x= Cousinia eongesta Caus x= Causínía platylepis Micro x= Causínía ehrysantha Alpin x= Cousinia disseeta Chrys Cousinia minkwitziae Caus x= Causinía palyeephala Cous x= Cousinia syrdariensis Cous x= Cousinia coronata Coron x= Cousinia mieroearpa Micro x= Cousinia sewerzowii Micro x= Cousinia eriobasis Lachn Cousinia esfandiarii Steno Cousinia piptoeephala Badg x= Cousinia tianshaniea Card x- 12 12 12 11 13 w 11 ~ .~ ...J '12 o!!l 12 12 12 13 13 11 -O> C/J.o :::> :> OC/) u 13 13 Jurinea albieauJis 100 100....- Jurínea lanipes 24 5 Jurínea robusta (9 f- :J 100....- Saussurea elegans 14 « o -u <: . O Saussurea maximowiezii Fig. l. Strict consensus lree of the mosl parsimonious trees generated by Ihe ITS region matrix. Subgenera: CYI/llr.= CYllaroides: Hyp.= Hypacall/hodes. Sections: Alpill= Alpb/(//!; Badg= Badghysia; Card= Cardlwcelllls; Chrys= Chrysoplem; Coroll= Corollophora: COl/s= COllsillia; CYllar= CYllaroideae; Erioe= Erioeollsi"ia; Ladll/= ulc/lIlosphael'ae: Leioe= Leioeallles; Micro= Mieroearpae; Srello= Srel/oceplwlae; Xyp1J= Xiphiolepides. (A) = Arclioid species. aUTG= Outgroup. Q)' . ., ...) • Arctias/mm pollen type ~ W COl/s;l/;a pollen type 112 COLLECTANEA BOTANICA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 as il even fails in supporting monophyly of lhe group (SS; 78% and DI ; 2 only). However, it is worlh remarking thallhe l1IatK analysis reflects lhe cul between Ihe "Arctioid" and lhe Colts;llia e1ades. even with poor support (SS:;; 71%, DI:;; 1). This demonstrates thar lhe separalion of both groups is very old, as could be expected from lhe different pollen types and chromosome numbers. As already suggested on lhe basis of morphoJogy, lhe Arctilllll group forro a strongly supported monophylelie clade, bOlh in lhe ITS (SS; 93%, DI ; 7) and eombined (SS; 93%, DI ; 6) analyses (Figs. 1,3 respeelively). This result eonfirms lhe importance of achene characters in lhe Cardueae, as lhis group was defined mainly on Ihe basis of shared achene apomorphies: wavy ar tigrille pattern in lhe pericarp and pappus selae individually deciduous (SUSANNA & GARCIA-JACAS, in press). Character evolution in the Areliu", group Habil aud morphology Our results suggest that the spiny habil is a derived character in the group. We can recall lhal OARC1A-JACAS el al. (2002) plaeed lhe An:lilllll group in a clade fonned by lhe subtribe Centallreinae and ils polential sisler groups, the genera Jurinea and Sallss/lrea. Wilhin Ihis group, unarmed habit is overwhelmingly dominant: aH the species of Jurinea and Saussl/rea are unarmed, and spines are a very rare fealure among the Centallre;nae: the only spiny genera in lhe subtribe are those of the Carthamlls complex, which are a derived group (GARCIA-JACA5 el al., 200 1), a fact thal reinforces the hypothesis of the derived character of spilles. Anceslors of the Arctillm group were probably unarmed plants lhat developed spines, like the genera of lhe CartlulI1J11s complex, as a secondary adaptation lO the defence againsl herbivores. In lhe case of COllsinia, spines have appeared twice in different lineages (Figs. 1,3): one in COllsin;a subgenus COllsinia and a second one in Hypaeallthillm and Schmalhallse"ia. Pollen and chromosomes We shall discuss together both characters as they appear to be correlaled. As has been repeatedly demonslraled in the e10sely related Cemallreinae, pollen and karyology are the mosl reliable characters for phylogenetic reconstruction and usually show also a narrow eorrelalion lo molecular phylogenies (SUSANNA el al., 1995; OARCtA-JACAS el al., 2ool). In the Arcti",lI group. Ihe correlation is a1so very narrow and Ihey are the only ones that define truly monophylelie groups (Figs. 1, 3). Pollen evolulion also follows lhe panem suggested by WAGENITZ (1955) for lhe Centaureinae, widely confirmed by molecular tools (GARCIA-JACA5 el al.. 2000, 2001). Areliaslmm pollen type of lhe "Arctioid" e1ade (Arclillm, Sehmalhallsenia and COIIsinia subg. Cynaroides and Hypaeanlhodes) is ancestral as compared lO the COllsi,¡ia pollen type: Areliaslmm is spiny, very similar to Ihe anceslral Serrallda pollen Iype of the Celllallreinae, while Cousinia pollen lype is smooth, much akin to Ihe Dealbata, Cymllls and Momana derived pollen types of Ihe Celllallreillae (VILATER5ANA el al., 2001). As lo chromosomal evolution, Ihe "Arctioid" e1ade is also ancestral to the Cousinia e1ade in this character. It is generally accepted lhat higher chromosome numbers are ancestral as compared lO lower ones, and this Irend has been demonSlrated in groups e10sely related to the Arclillfll group like subtribe Cenlaureinae (GARCIA-JACA5 et al., 2001). In our case, the base chromosome number x :;;; 18 of the "Arclioid" e1ade is ancestral as compared to lhe • ; ll, 12 or 13 of lhe COIISillio clade (Figs. 1, 3). A. SUSANNA, N. GARCIA-JACAS. R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE 113 r - - !Aretium lappa '"- ~rctium minus '"- Cousinia triflora 92 2 71 1 64 1 78 2 Cousinia umbrosa Cousinia karatavica Cousinia grandifolia Cousinia albertii I-ehmalhausenia nidulans w O « ...J U O O f- U (( « Cousinia lappacea Cousinia esfandiarii Cousinia ehrysantha Cousinia minkwitziae Cousinia polyeephala Cousinia syrdariensis Cousinia coronata Cousinia purpurea Cousinia congesta Cousinia Cousinia Cousinia Cousinia Cousinia platylepis arachnoidea microcarpa astracanica tianshanica Cousinia caespitosa Cousinia sewerzowii Jurinea albieaulis Jurinea robusta Jurinea lanipes Fig. 2.- Strict consensus lree of (he mos! parsimonious lrees generaled by lhe 1II111K matrix. Generic implications The delineation of Aretium and Cousinia Our results pose a very inleresling but vexing problem on the generic delineation of Aretillm and COlIsinia: how to conjugate conflicting morphological, on the one hand. and molecular, pollen and karyological dala, on lhe olher hand. Molecular analyses suggest a clear separation (and a very ancient one, as renected by the matK data) between the "Arctioid" clade and COlIsinia sensu slriclo, strongly supported by pollen and karyological dala (Figs. 1, 2. 3). The problem is, lhen, whal lO do wilh Hypacamhium and Schmalhausenia. On strict molecular, pollen and karyological grounds, 114 COLLECTANEA BOTAN1CA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 they belong without any doubt 10 {he "Arctioid" dade... whose homogeneity they destroy on morphological grounds! As stated in the introduClion of this papero ¡he only useful characlers for segregating ArClium and COltsinia are (he Icaves and, partly. (he appendages of the bracls. Pollen types and karyology are excellent markers, hUl lhey are nol macroscopic and henee of lillle praelieal utilily. Morphology of Ihe stigmas eould be useful (il should be rully explored in COlls;llia s. sIr.), hUI il is very difficult lo observe too. OUT own observations suggesl that there are sorne differences in length and distribution of (he collector hairs: lhey are long and sparsely distributed along the whole lenglh of the stigma in COllsi/lia s. 8lT., and short and concentrated on the basal thickening in Arctium. Schmalhausen;a is intermediate belween bOlh models, but c10ser to Aretium. However, from our point of view, differences are nol so substantive as c1aimed by DUlSTERMAAT (1996). We have to resort to lhe leaves and, if we follow this morphological definition, Hypaca1lth;1l111 and ScllIllalhal/sell;a (probably a single genus) wauld be c1assified in COIIS;Il;a sensu stricto, conlradicting molecular, karyological and pollen evidence. There are three possible solutions to this incongruence. The first ane should be to keep present c1assification in four genera with a different delimitation: Aret;ulII (ineluding COIls;llia subgenera Cynaro;des and Hypacallthodes), COlls;1lia, Hypaca1lthillm and Schmalhal/sen;a, disregarding the fact of the polyphyly of the resulting genus Aret;um (Figs. 1,3). This solution does nal seem adequate, if our goal is lO achieve a natural c1assification. A second altemative would be to elevate the subgenera of COlIs;n;a wilh Arct;aSTrlllll palien type to the genus rank. The resulting Arct;um group would encompass six genera: Arct;ut1l sensu str., COlls¡'lia s. str., Cy"aro;des, Hypaca1lth;um, Hypacallthodes and Schmalhallsenia. The possible genus CY1laroides stands as a very well defined group on molecular grounds (SS = 100%, DI = II in Ihe ITS lree, Fig. 1; SS = 100%, DI = 12 in Ihe combined tree, Fig. 3), and our sampling is complete enough as to draw conelusions (five oul of seven seelions of Ihe subgenus, according lO TSCHERNEVA'S (l988b, 1988e) c1assification). In contrast, our sampling of sect. Hypacallthodes is too short (one out of four seclions) and the only included species forms a well·supported c1ade with Hypacalllh;lIm and Sehllla/hal/senia (SS = 93%, DI = 5 in the ITS Iree, Fig. 1; SS = 90%, DI = 5 in Ihe combined Iree [withoul Hypacallth;lIm], Fig. 3), a grouping lhal needs verificmion. However, we can anticipate that the problem of making up these six genera ¡s, again, morpho· logical. The boundaries between Hypacalllh;u11l and Schmalhallsen;a, on the one hand, and Cous;/I;a sensu str., on the other hand, are unc1ear: pollen type and karyology are the only reliable characters thal separale lhem. The stigma characters could be of help, bUl further studies are needed in COIIS;ll;a. Besides, the limits between Arct;u11I and a new genus Cy"aroides would also be uncertain on slrict morphological grounds because subg. Cy"aroides ¡neludes the arctioid species of Cous;nia. Finally, Ihere is Ihe solulion suggesled by KUNTZE (1891): lO lump logelher alllhe genera described in lhe Arcliu11I group in a single genus Arctillm (as this genus would be nomcnelaturally prioritary). We are conscious of the nomenclatural consequences of this solution: sorne 420 species of Cousinia will have to be changed to Areti/l'" -KUNTZE (1891) already proposed ca. 180 new combinations·. Nevertheless, if new studies in the group (especially with the ¡nclusion of mOfe species of CO/ls;/lia subgenus Hypacallthodes) confirm our results, it will probably be the only solution. Molecular phyloge,ry o1ld sectional classifieat;orl o/ CousilJia We are aware of the severe Iimitations of our sampling regarding COlIsill;a subg. Cousillia. However, from our study emerges a general incongruence belween sectional c1assification A. SUSANNA. N. GARCIA-JACAS. R. VU..ATERSANA & T. Arctium /appa Arctium minus 89 3 [Cousinia grandifolia Hyp Schmalhausenia nidulans Cousinia a/bert;; Cyn Cousinia karatavica Cyn lOO Cousinia umbrosa [A] Cyn 12 ~ 1 ...;;.,1 Cousinia lappacea [A] Cyn 1 Cousinía triflora Cvn Cousinia arachnoidea 77 Cousinia astracanica 2 Cousinia purpurea Cousinia caespitosa 58 6 Cousinia congesta 1 Cousinia platylepis Cousinia chrysantha ~ Cousinia minkwitziae 5 63 Cousinia po/ycephala 2 3 Cousinia syrdariensis Cousinia tianshanica Cousinia esfandiarii Cousinia coronata 69 Cousinia microcarpa 1 Cousinia sewenowii Jurínea a/bícaulis 100 27 ~ Jurínea lanípes 5 Jurínea robusta Saussurea elegans 100 . .. 17 Saussurea maXlmOWICZII -K @ " " > " 97 5 115 GARNATJE ~ TC w I~ ...J üeo o~ -" Ox f- Ü a: « -te 93 6 ~ 67 2 ~ l2.. 4 ~ ~JfC w O'" :)~ üÑ -«~ <:~ -~ "'" ;)x O Ü ,... .... o. ::J O o:: C9 f::J O Fig. 3. Slrict consensus tree of the most parsimonious trees generated by Ihe combined IIIt1tKITS malrix. Subgenera: CYllar.= CYI/aroitles; Hyp.= HYPllclIIlIllOdes. (A] = Arclioid species. \Q)' " ':) Arctiastrum palien type ~; COl/sil/ia palien type by TSCHERNEVA (1988b, 1988e), mapped in lhe ITS eonsensus tree (Fig. I" and molecular phylogeny. By way of example. the fOUT Tepresenlatives of sect. Coltsitlia do nol fOTm a monophylelic e1ade. Species of sect. COlls;nia with x = 12 are placed in the same elade. whilst Colts;/I;a cOllges/a with x = 13 is placed in a different e1ade (Fig. 1). AnOlher case is secl. Microcarpae. with four represenlatives that are placed in Ihree different eludes 116 COLLECfANEA BOTANICA (BARCELONA) 26. 2003 (Fig. 1). In bolh cases, the groups seem la be more correlated to chromosome numbers than (O preseot c1assification. This result apeos an interesting way lO further sludies in the genus Cousinia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AUlhors th.nk A. 1. Iv.schenko, L. K.puslin., F. Kh.ss.nov .nd J. V.lles for their help with field collections in Central Asia; 1. Valles again for his help with the Russian literature; R. VOgl, Botanical Museum of Berlio, for authorising the use of herbarium material for OUT molecular analyses; and the Ofuna Botanical Garden (Japan) for providing seeds of Sallssurea maximowicl.ii Herder. This research was supported by (he Dirección General de Enseñ.nz. Superior, Sp.in (projecl PB 97/1134); the Dirección General de Investig.ción, Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologí., Sp.in (projects BOS200 1-304 I-C02-02); .nd the Gener.lit.l de C.l.luny. (.juts • grups de recerca consolid.ts 1999SGROO332 .nd 200 1SGROO I25). REFERENCES G. (1873). Composirae. In: Benlham, G. & J. D. Hooker (eds.). Gel/era P/allIlmml. Lavell Reeve & Co.• London: 162·533. BOISSIER. E. (1875). Flora oriemalis 3. H. Georg, Geneve - Basel - Lyon. SoRNMOUER. J. (1916). En beitrag zur Kenntnis der Ganung COllsillia. BeiIL Bot. Celllra/bI. 34 (2): 131·203. BREMER, K. (1988). The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenelic reconslruction. Evo/mio" 42: 795·803. BREMER. K. (1994). Asteract!ae. C/adistics amI classificatioll. Timber Press. Portland. BUNGE, A. (1865). Obersichlliche Zusammenslellung der Arten der Ganung COflsi"ia Cass. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. Sab" Pétersbourg, sér. VII. 9 (2): 1·56. CASSIN1. H. (1819). [Different anicles). DictiomlOire de Sciellces Nafllrelles. Paris. Ciled by King, R. & H. W. Dawson (1975), Cassil/i 011 Composirae. Oriole, New York. CULLlNGS. K. W. (1992). Design and testing of a plant-specific PCR primer for ecological and evolutionary sludies. Mole,'. Eco/. 1: 233·240. DJITRICH, M. (1977). Cyllllreae·systematic review. In Heywood. V. H., J. B. Harborne & B. L. Tumer (eds.). The Bi%gy ami Chemisrry 01 rhe Composirae. Academic Press, Landon • New York - San Francisco: 999-1015. DoNOGHuE. M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAO. J. F. SMITIl & J. D. PALMER (1992). Phylogenelic relationships of Dipsacales based on rbcL sequences. AmI. Missollri BOl. Carden 79: 333-345. DoYlE. J. J. & J. L. DoYlE (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Ph)'lOchem. 811/1. 19: 11-15. DUISTERMAAT. H. (1996). Monograph of Arcrillm L. (Asteraceae). Generic delimitation (including COllsillia Cass. p. p.). revision ofthe species. pollen morphology and hybrids. Correria 3: 1-143. DUISTERMAAT. H. (1997). Arerilllll geuing enlangled lo Cousi"ia (Asreraceae: Cardlleae). Boccollea BENTHAM, 5: 685-689. FARRIS, J. S.. M. KALLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE & C. BULT (1995). Testing significance of incongruence. Cladisfics 10: 315~319. FELSENSTEIN. J. (1985). Confidence limils on phylogenies: an approach using the boolstrap. EVO/l/rioll 39: 783·791. GARCIA·JACAS. N.• T. GARNATJE. A. SUSANNA & R. VILATERSANA (2002). Tribal and subtribal delimilalion and phylogeny of the Cardlltae (Asreraceae): a combined nuclear 3nd chloroplasl DNA analysis. Mo/ee. PI,y/. Evo/. 22 (1): 51·64. GARCIA-JACAS. N.. A. SUSANNA. T. GARNATJE & R. VlLATERSANA (200 1). Generic delimitalion and phylogeny of the subtribe Celllaurei"ae (Asreraceae): n combined nuclear nnd chloropla.st DNA nnalysis. AmI. Bar. (Landon) 87: 503·515. A. SUSANNA, N. GARCIA-JACAS. R. VILATERSANA & T. GARNATJE 117 GARCIA·JACAS. N.. A. SUSANNA. V. MOZAFFARIAN. & R. ILARSLAN (2000). The nalUra1 dclirnilalion of Ce1ltaurea (Aslt!raceae: Care/ueae): ITS sequences analysis of Ihe Jacea group. PI. SYSf. E,·ol. 223: 185-199. GHAFFARI. S. M. & S. B. OJAVADI (1998) Chrornosorne sludies and distribution of nine species of Coltsinia section Slellocephalae (Asteraceae) in Iran. 81111. Soco Nellcháteloise Sci. Nat. 121: 61 -68. GHAFFARI. S. M.. F. AiTAR & A. GHAHREMAN (2000). DislribUlion and chromosome sludies on sorne species of Cousinia Cass. (seclion CYllaroideae) from Iran. Pakistall J. Bat. 32 (2): 311·316. GOLDBLAiT. P. (l981).lndex to plant chromosome numbers 1975·1978. MOllogr. Syst. BOl. MiSSOllri Bot. Carden 5. GOLDBLAiT. P. (1988). Index lO planl chromosome nurnbers 1975-1978. MOl1ogr. Syst. Bot. Mi.fSOllri 80t. Care/e" 23. GOLDBLAiT. P. & D. E, JOHNSON (1990). Index lO plant chromosome numbers 1975·1978. MOl/ogr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Carde" 30. GOLDIlLATf. P. & O. E. JOHNSON (1991). Index to plant chromosome nurnbers 1975·1978. /I10/l0gl: Sys/. BOl. Mjssollri BOl. Carden 40. HAFFNER. E. (2000). On the phylogeny of Ihe sublribe Carduillae (Iribe C(IIrllleae. Composi({le). Eligiera 2 J. HAFFNER. E. & F. H. HELLWIG (1999). Phylogeny of Ihe Iribe Cardlleae (Composi({le) wilh emphasis on the subtribe Cardllillae: an analysis based on ITS sequence data. Willdetloll'io 29: 27·39. HOFFMANN. O. (1894). Composifae. In Engler. A. & A. E. K. Prantl (eds.). Die nalÜrlichell Pj1allzellfamilie". Wilhelm Engelrnann. Leipzig: 324·331 JANSEN. R. K.• K. E. HOLSINGER. H. J. MICHAElS & J. D. PALMER (1990). The phylogenelic analysis of chloroplasl ONA restriclion site dala al higher laxonomic levels: an example from the Asleraceae. Evolulio" 44: 2089·2105. JANSEN. R. K.. K. E. HOLSINGER & J. O. PALMER (1991). Phylogeny and charaCler evolulion in Ihe Astuaceae based on chloroplast DNA reslriction sile mapping. S)'st. BOl. 16: 98·115. JOHNSON. L. A. & O. E. SOLTIS (1995). Phylogenelic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Cilia (Polemolliaceae) using matK sequences. A,,". Missollri Bot. Cardell 82: 149·175. KIM. K.-J., R. K. JANSEN. R. S. WALLACE. H. J. MICHAELS & J. O. PAUIER (1992). Phylogenelic imp1icalions of rbcL sequence varialion in the Asten/ceae. AmI. MissOllri Bot. Carrlell 79: 428-445. KNAPJ>. H. O. (1987). On Ihe distribution of the genus COlIsillitt (Composiwe). PI. S)'Sl. El'Ol. 155: 15·25. KUNTZE. O. (1891). Revisjo gelleTllm plamaTIII1l l. Arlhur Felix. Leipzig. KUPRIANOVA. L. A. & O. V. TSCHERNEVA (1982). Pollen rnorphology ¡md ultrastruclure of palynoderma in Ihe species of Ihe genus Cal/sil/jo (A.~reraceoe) in relation lO lhe systematics of the genus [in Russian]. 80t. 2l/m. SSSR 67 (5): 581-589. MABBERLEY, O. J. (1990). TlJe plal/t book. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. MADDISON. O. R. (1991). The discovery and imporlance of multip1e islands of mosl parsimonious Irees. S)'Sl. 2001. 40: 315·328. MEUSEL. H.. E. JAGER & E. WEINERT (1965). Verglt!'iclleltde Cllorologie da zelllraleuropiiischell Flora l. G. Fischer. Jena. MOORE. R. J. (1973). Index lO plant chromosome numbers 1967nl. Regltlllll \'egelllbile 90. MOORE. R. J. (1977). Index lo plant chrornosome numbers 1973n4. Regmlllt Vegelllbile 96. MORGAN. O. R. (1997). Oecay analysis of large sets of phylogenetic data. Taxoll 46: 509·517. PETIT. O. P. (1997). Generic interrelationships of Ihe Carrflleae (Composirae): a cladislic analysis of morphological data. PI. S)'st. Evol. 207: 173·203. PETrr. O. P.. J. MAntEZ & A. QAID (1996). Early differemialion of Ihe Carrll/eae seltstllmo: morphology and pellen. In Hind. O. J. N. & H. J. Beenlje (eds.). Composiwe: S)'slematics. Proceee/iltgs of the IlItemotional Composilae Coltferellce. Kel\\ 1994. Royal BOlanical Gardens. Kew: 79·93. RECHINGER. K. H. (1972). COllsi"ia. In Rechinger. K. H. (ed.). Flora Inmica 90. Composiwe· CYllareae l. Akademische Oruck· und Verlagsanslalt. Graz. RECHINGER. K. H. (1979). CO/lsillia. In Rechinger. K. H. (ed.). Flora frallica 139a. COlllposiwl! 111· Cyltareae. Akademische Oruck· und Verlagsanslalt. Graz: 108-153. SCHTEPA. J. S. (1966). On Ihe problem of Ihe affinity belween Ihe genera Arc:rillIJ/ L. and COl/sil/;" Cass. of Ihe family Composilae. The importance of palynological analysis for Ihe slratigraphy and paleonoristic investigation. Akademiya Nauk, Leningrad: 35-36. 118 COLLECrANEA BOTANICA (BARCELONA) 26, 2003 SCHTEPA. 1. S. (1976). Palynological invesligation of COlls¡"ia sect. EriOCOlls¡nia (Compositae). Proceedillgs 01 ,he 41h ¡'uemaliollal Pal)'f1ological COllference: 31-33. SOLT1S, D. E.. P. S. SOLTIS. T. G. COLLlER & M. L. EDGERTON (1991). The Hellcllera group (Saxi/ragaceae): evidence for chloroplast transfer and paraphyly. Ame/: J. 80r. 78: 1091-1112. SUN. Y.• D. Z. SKINNER. G. H. LlANO & S. H. HULBERT (1994). Phylogenetic analysis of SorgJlIIm and related taxa using intemal rranscribed spacers of nuclear ribasaronl DNA. 17leor. Appl. Gelle" 89: 26-32. SUSANNA. A. & GARCIA-JACAS. N. (in press). The Iribe Cardlleae. In Kubitzki. J. (ed.), Tlle Families o1ld Genera 01 Flowerillg Plams. Asteraceae (Kadereit. J.• ed.). Springer. Heidelberg. SUSANNA. A.• N. GARCIA-JACAS. D. E. SOLTIS & P. S. SOLTIS (1995). Phylogenelic relationships in tribe Carrfueae (Asferaceae) based on ITS sequences. Amer. J. BOl. 82: 1056·1068. SUSANNA. A.. N. GARCIA·Jacas. R. VIl.ATERSANA. T. GARNATJE. J. VALL~ & S. M. GHAFfARI (2003). New chromosome counls in the genus COl/sillia and the related genus Scitmaf1lOl/sellia (Asleraceae. Cardl/eae). Bol. J. Li/l/l. Soco (in press). SWOFFORD, D. L. (1999). PAUP·. Phylogenelic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Melhods). Version 4.0b4a. Sil/allel; SUJlderfwul. SWOFFORD. D. L. & OLSEN. G. J. (1990). Phylogeny reconSlruclion. In Hillis, D. & C. Moritz (eds.). Molecular syslematics. Sinauer. Sunderland: 411·501. TSCHERNEVA. O. v. (1962). Rod 1578. Coltsillia Cass. In Schischkin. B. K. & E. G. Bobrov (eds.). Flora SSSR 27. Akademiya Nauk, Moscow - Leningrad: 110-351. TSCHERNEVA. O. V. (1974). Brief analysis of COllsi"ia Cass. species geographical distribulion (in RussianJ. BOl. Zumo SSSR 59 (2): 183·191. TSCHERNEVA. O. v. (1983). The genus Hypacallfhiltlll (Asleraceae) and ils representalives in middle Asia [in Russi:m]. BOl. 21/m. SSSR 68 (5): 632-635. TSCHERNEVA. O. V. (1985). Chromosome numbers in Ihe species of Ihe genus COlIsillia (Asleraceae) in Ihe flora of the USSR (in Russian]. Bol. ZlIrIl. SSSR 70 (6): 856-857. TSCHERNEVA. O. V. (1988a). New supraspecific taxa of Ihe genus Cousillia (Asleraceae) [in Russian}. 801. t",•. SSSR 73 (4): 594·597. TSCHERNEVA. O. V. (1988b). A synopsis of Ihe Cousillia (AsleraCeal!') genus syslem in Ihe flora ofthe USSR [in Russi.n). 801. illm. SSSR 73 (6): 870·876. TSCHERNEVA. O. v. (1988c). T"l!' COllsillia o/tlle SSSR [in Russian]. Leningrad: Akademiya Nauk. VILATERSANA. R.. J. MARTfN VILLOORE. A. SUSANNA, N. GARCIA·JACAS & T. GARNATJE (2001). Palien studies in sublribe Cell/aureillae (ASfl!'raCeae): Ihe CarlllO/IIllS complex and Ihe genus Al!'gialophila analyzed wilh electron microscopy. PI. Biol. 3: 607-615. WAGENITZ, G. (1955). Pollenmorphologie und Systemalik in der Galtung CenTal/rea L. S. 1. Flora 142: 213·279. WAGENITZ. G. (1976). Syslematics and Phylogeny of Ihe CompOSilal!' (Asleraceae). PI. SYSl. Evol. 125: 29-46. WINKLER. C. (1892). SYllopsis speciemm gelleris COlIsi"iae Cass. Trudy 0Iav". BOl. Sada 12 (2): 181-286.